Jotaki Shosaburo, Murotani Kenta, Oshita Kensuke, Hiraki Teruyuki
Department of Anesthesiology, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-machi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan.
Biostatistics Center, Kurume University, 67 Asahi-machi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan.
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 27;10(19):e38643. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38643. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
This study investigated whether pulmonary artery catheter placement method with combined transesophageal echocardiography and pressure waveform measurement improve the placement success rate within 5 min and reduce the incidence of arrhythmia during pulmonary artery catheter placement compared to conventional pulmonary artery catheter placement with pressure waveform measurement only.
This single center prospective observational study included 129 patients scheduled for cardiac surgery. Patients were divided into two groups. In the conventional group, the pulmonary artery catheter was placed by monitoring the pressure waveform and the length of placement; in the combination group, not only were the pressure waveform and the length monitored but also the following transesophageal echocardiography images: "mid esophageal bicaval view," " mid esophageal modified bicaval view," a mirror image of "mid esophageal 4 chamber view," "mid esophageal right ventricular inflow-outflow view," and "mid esophageal ascending aortic short axis view."
A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to adjust for confounding factors. The success rates of pulmonary artery catheter placement within 5 min in the conventional and combination groups were 85.5 % vs. 97.8 % (p = 0.032) before matching, and 73.7 % vs. 100 % (p = 0.001) after matching. The incidences of arrhythmias in the conventional and combination groups were 28.9 % vs. 17.4 % (p = 0.20) before matching, and 28.9 % vs. 18.4 % (p = 0.42) after matching.
Pulmonary artery catheter placement with transesophageal echocardiography had a significantly higher rate of successful placement within 5 min, but no significant differences were observed in the incidences of arrhythmias.
本研究旨在探讨与仅通过压力波形测量进行传统肺动脉导管置入相比,联合经食管超声心动图和压力波形测量的肺动脉导管置入方法是否能提高5分钟内的置入成功率,并降低肺动脉导管置入期间心律失常的发生率。
这项单中心前瞻性观察性研究纳入了129例计划进行心脏手术的患者。患者被分为两组。在传统组中,通过监测压力波形和置入长度来放置肺动脉导管;在联合组中,不仅监测压力波形和长度,还监测以下经食管超声心动图图像:“食管中段双腔静脉视图”、“食管中段改良双腔静脉视图”、“食管中段四腔视图”的镜像、“食管中段右心室流入流出视图”和“食管中段升主动脉短轴视图”。
采用1:1倾向评分匹配来调整混杂因素。匹配前,传统组和联合组5分钟内肺动脉导管置入成功率分别为85.5%和97.8%(p = 0.032),匹配后分别为73.7%和100%(p = 0.001)。匹配前,传统组和联合组心律失常发生率分别为28.9%和17.4%(p = 0.20),匹配后分别为28.9%和18.4%(p = 0.42)。
经食管超声心动图引导下的肺动脉导管置入在5分钟内的成功置入率显著更高,但心律失常发生率无显著差异。