Imtiaz Hassan, Ali Chadi, Noordeen Hilali, Anwar Hanny
Trauma and Orthopaedics, Poole General Hospital, Poole, GBR.
Spine Surgery, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, GBR.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 11;16(9):e69214. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69214. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Introduction Surgical site infections (SSIs) are one of the dreaded complications of spinal surgery. These typically develop within the first 30 days following surgery. The overall pooled incidence of SSIs is reported at 3.1%. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been employed for the management of open wounds and soft tissue injury. There has been a recent trend towards the use of closed incision NPWT (ciNPT), such as PICO. There are only a few studies evaluating the prophylactic use of ciNPT in spinal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether prophylactic use of PICO dressings can reduce SSI incidence and complications in spinal surgery. Methods Data were collected retrospectively for patients undergoing spinal surgery, with a PICO dressing used for closed surgical incisions, from February 2021 to October 2022. Each patient was followed up for 30 days. The results were compared with local hospital infection control statistics for previous years. Results A total of 50 patients underwent spinal surgery and had PICO dressings post-operatively. None of the patients developed a seroma. Two out of 50 (4.0%) patients developed wound dehiscence and then subsequent SSI (1 superficial, 1 deep). These were managed conservatively with the use of antibiotics and prolonged ciNPT. None of these patients returned to the theatre. The average SSI incidence from previous years was 9.27 ± 4.14 per annum (1.15%), but with an average of 77.3% of these requiring a return to theatres. Conclusion Our study reflects that there is no difference in the incidence rates for SSIs for patients who have PICO dressings versus those having standard occlusive dressings as post-operative closed surgical incision site wound closure following spinal surgery. For those who do develop SSIs, there was no difference in the rates of return to theatres among the two patient populations.
引言
手术部位感染(SSIs)是脊柱手术可怕的并发症之一。这些感染通常在术后30天内发生。据报道,SSIs的总体合并发病率为3.1%。负压伤口治疗(NPWT)已被用于开放性伤口和软组织损伤的处理。最近有一种使用闭合切口NPWT(ciNPT)的趋势,如PICO。仅有少数研究评估了ciNPT在脊柱手术中的预防性应用。本研究的目的是评估预防性使用PICO敷料是否能降低脊柱手术中SSIs的发生率和并发症。
方法
回顾性收集2021年2月至2022年10月接受脊柱手术且使用PICO敷料进行闭合手术切口的患者数据。对每位患者进行30天的随访。将结果与当地医院前几年的感染控制统计数据进行比较。
结果
共有50例患者接受了脊柱手术并在术后使用了PICO敷料。没有患者发生血清肿。50例患者中有2例(4.0%)出现伤口裂开,随后发生SSIs(1例表浅,1例深部)。这些患者通过使用抗生素和延长ciNPT进行保守治疗。这些患者均未返回手术室。前几年SSIs的平均发病率为每年9.27±4.14例(1.15%),但其中平均77.3%的患者需要返回手术室。
结论
我们的研究表明,脊柱手术后,使用PICO敷料的患者与使用标准封闭敷料的患者作为术后闭合手术切口部位伤口闭合的SSIs发病率没有差异。对于确实发生SSIs的患者,两组患者返回手术室的比例没有差异。