The Suprascapular Artery as a Reference for the Evaluation of Supraspinatus Fatty Infiltration on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

BACKGROUND

Fatty infiltration (FI) of the supraspinatus is commonly seen in chronic large-to-massive rotator cuff tears. Evaluating FI in patients with severe muscle atrophy can be confusing.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomic relationship between the suprascapular artery and supraspinatus muscle on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to provide a method for defining the border of the supraspinatus muscle on Y-view MRI. It was hypothesized that the branches of the suprascapular artery would encircle the supraspinatus muscle on Y-view and adjacent MRI slices and could be used for defining the supraspinatus outline on oblique sagittal images.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 172 shoulders that had undergone arthroscopic repair for large-to-massive rotator cuff tears were retrospectively included. Two methods, one based on the supraspinous fossa and trapezius (SF method) and the other based on the region bounded by the branches of the suprascapular artery (SA method), were used for defining the supraspinatus outline on Y-view MRI for the assessment of FI. Preoperative supraspinatus FI grade and tangent sign and postoperative tendon integrity were evaluated. Shoulder function was assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and active range of motion.

RESULTS

The branches of the suprascapular artery encircled the supraspinatus in all shoulders, with the diameter of the branches ranging from 0.5 to 3 mm. The agreement in supraspinatus FI grading between the SF and SA methods was 65.12%. When limited to the 61 shoulders with a positive tangent sign, the agreement dropped to 22.95% (κ = 0.032). The group (FI grade 2 by SA method and ≥3 by SF method) showed no significant difference in postoperative outcomes compared with the 2-vs-2 group but had significantly better postoperative ASES scores ( = .001) and active range of motion in forward elevation ( = .020) compared with the ≥3-vs-≥3 group. The tangent sign was positive in 92.16% of the 2-vs-≥3 group.

CONCLUSION

The suprascapular artery is a reliable reference for the evaluation of supraspinatus FI. When a positive tangent sign presents, supraspinatus FI is likely to be overestimated if the hyperintensity outside the region bounded by the branches of the suprascapular artery is mistaken as FI.