• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

攀登研究阶梯:对整形外科医生从K奖到R奖资助转换的25年分析。

Climbing the Research Ladder: A 25-year Analysis of K-to-R Grant Conversion among Plastic Surgeons.

作者信息

Arcelona Christian N, Hallman Taylor G, Qureshi Umer A, Gutowski Kristof S, Donaldson Rachel E, Figueroa Ariel E, Gosain Arun K

机构信息

From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Ill.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Oct 11;12(10):e6233. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006233. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006233
PMID:39399798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11469810/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluate the performance of plastic surgeons in converting National Institutes of Health K grants in early career to R grants intended for established investigators. We also investigate characteristics that may positively predict successful transition from K to R grants.

METHODS

K08, K23, and R01 (or equivalent) grants awarded to plastic surgeons and physicians within the departments of ophthalmology, dermatology, and neurosurgery were collected. Analyses of successful conversion rates from a K to an R grant between plastic surgeons and physicians within the selected departments were performed. Cross-sectional analysis of characteristics among identified plastic surgeons was completed via logistic regression to elucidate possible predictors of successful conversion.

RESULTS

Comparison of pathway initiation rates demonstrate that plastic surgeons receive significantly fewer K grants relative to the size of their field when compared with other specialties (all < 0.01). Of the analyzed plastic surgeons, 52.9% successfully converted to an R-series grant within 5.4 years of beginning their K-series grant. Conversion rates were not significantly different between plastic surgeons and physicians within the selected departments. Logistic regression analyses revealed that the time-adjusted mean relative citation ratio of K series-associated publications is a positive predictor of successful conversion ( = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

With regard to increasing National Institutes of Health funding via the K-to-R pathway, we believe the field of plastic surgery could benefit from an increased effort to pursue a pathway of K-to-R conversion with a focus on quality over quantity when publishing articles associated with a K-series grant.

摘要

背景

我们评估整形外科医生在将早期职业生涯中获得的美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)K类资助转换为面向资深研究者的R类资助方面的表现。我们还研究可能对从K类资助成功过渡到R类资助有积极预测作用的特征。

方法

收集授予整形外科医生以及眼科、皮肤科和神经外科部门内科医生的K08、K23和R01(或同等类型)资助。对选定部门内整形外科医生和内科医生从K类资助成功转换为R类资助的成功率进行分析。通过逻辑回归对已确定的整形外科医生的特征进行横断面分析,以阐明成功转换的可能预测因素。

结果

对资助起始率的比较表明,与其他专业相比,整形外科医生获得的K类资助相对于其所在领域的规模明显更少(所有P<0.01)。在分析的整形外科医生中,52.9%在开始K类资助后的5.4年内成功转换为R系列资助。选定部门内整形外科医生和内科医生的转换率没有显著差异。逻辑回归分析显示,K系列相关出版物的时间调整平均相对引用率是成功转换的一个积极预测因素(P = 0.047)。

结论

关于通过K到R途径增加美国国立卫生研究院的资金,我们认为整形外科领域可能会受益于加大努力来追求K到R的转换途径,在发表与K系列资助相关的文章时注重质量而非数量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0af2/11469810/035f4285e056/gox-12-e6233-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0af2/11469810/9ef7deace7b1/gox-12-e6233-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0af2/11469810/16b01117d594/gox-12-e6233-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0af2/11469810/3975a3240443/gox-12-e6233-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0af2/11469810/035f4285e056/gox-12-e6233-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0af2/11469810/9ef7deace7b1/gox-12-e6233-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0af2/11469810/16b01117d594/gox-12-e6233-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0af2/11469810/3975a3240443/gox-12-e6233-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0af2/11469810/035f4285e056/gox-12-e6233-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Climbing the Research Ladder: A 25-year Analysis of K-to-R Grant Conversion among Plastic Surgeons.攀登研究阶梯:对整形外科医生从K奖到R奖资助转换的25年分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Oct 11;12(10):e6233. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006233. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons Achieve High Rates of K Award Conversion Into R01 Funding.心胸血管外科医生实现了 K 奖转化为 R01 资助的高成功率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Aug;106(2):602-607. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.029. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
3
National Institutes of Health Career Development (K) Awards to Young Surgeons: An Academic Milestone or One-hit Wonder?美国国立卫生研究院职业发展 (K) 奖授予年轻外科医生:学术里程碑还是昙花一现?
Ann Surg. 2021 Oct 1;274(4):549-555. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005066.
4
Fewer Than One in 20 Current Academic Orthopaedic Surgeons Have Obtained National Institutes of Health Funding.当前,不到 1/20 的学术型骨科医生获得过美国国立卫生研究院的资助。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jul 1;481(7):1265-1272. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002556. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
5
Transition to Independent Research Funding Among National Institutes of Health K Grant Awardees at Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery.骨科 NIH K 拨款获得者向独立研究经费的过渡。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Nov 17;103(22):e90. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01754.
6
Physician-scientists in obstetrics and gynecology: predictors of success in obtaining independent research funding.妇产科领域的医师科学家:获得独立研究资金成功与否的预测因素
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):84.e1-84.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
7
A Ten-Year Analysis of Recent National Institutes of Health Funding for Anesthesiology Research in United States Medical Schools.美国医学院麻醉学研究中近期美国国立卫生研究院资助的十年分析。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Jul;36(7):1844-1855. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.02.008. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
8
Success in Attaining Independent Funding Among National Institutes of Health K Grant Awardees in Ophthalmology: An Extended Follow-up.在眼科 NIH K 补助金获得者中获得独立资助的成功:延长随访。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 1;136(12):1335-1340. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.3887.
9
The pediatric surgeon's road to research independence: utility of mentor-based National Institutes of Health grants.儿科外科医师的研究独立之路:基于导师的美国国立卫生研究院资助的效用。
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.03.050. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
10
Does NIH funding differ between medical specialties? A longitudinal analysis of NIH grant data by specialty and type of grant, 2011-2020.NIH 资助在医学专业之间存在差异吗?对 2011-2020 年 NIH 资助数据按专业和资助类型进行的纵向分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 30;12(12):e058191. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058191.

本文引用的文献

1
Transition to Independent Research Funding Among National Institutes of Health K Grant Awardees at Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery.骨科 NIH K 拨款获得者向独立研究经费的过渡。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Nov 17;103(22):e90. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01754.
2
Mentoring New and Early-Stage Investigators and Underrepresented Minority Faculty for Research Success in Health-Related Fields: An Integrative Literature Review (2010-2020).指导新的和处于早期阶段的研究人员和代表性不足的少数族裔教师进行与健康相关领域的研究成功:综合文献回顾(2010-2020 年)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;18(2):432. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020432.
3
Majority of Most-Cited Articles in Top Plastic Surgery Journals Do Not Receive Funding.
大多数顶级整形外科期刊中被引最多的文章没有获得资助。
Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Jun 14;41(7):NP935-NP938. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa379.
4
The NIH Open Citation Collection: A public access, broad coverage resource.NIH 开放引文集:一个公共获取、广泛覆盖的资源。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Oct 10;17(10):e3000385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000385. eCollection 2019 Oct.
5
Success in Attaining Independent Funding Among National Institutes of Health K Grant Awardees in Ophthalmology.国立卫生研究院眼科K奖获得者获得独立资助的成功率。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 1;137(6):720. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0577.
6
Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons Achieve High Rates of K Award Conversion Into R01 Funding.心胸血管外科医生实现了 K 奖转化为 R01 资助的高成功率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Aug;106(2):602-607. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.029. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
7
Trends and Predictors of National Institutes of Health Funding to Plastic Surgery Residency Programs.美国国立卫生研究院对整形外科住院医师培训项目的资助趋势及预测因素
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6):1301-1311. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003866.
8
Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level.相对引用率(RCR):一种利用引用率在文章层面衡量影响力的新指标。
PLoS Biol. 2016 Sep 6;14(9):e1002541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002541. eCollection 2016 Sep.
9
National Institutes of Health Funding in Plastic Surgery: A Crisis?美国国立卫生研究院在整形外科领域的资金投入:一场危机?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep;138(3):732-739. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002490.
10
The Impact of National Institutes of Health Funding on Scholarly Productivity in Academic Plastic Surgery.美国国立卫生研究院的资金对学术整形外科领域学术产出的影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Feb;137(2):690-695. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000475798.69478.ea.