Suppr超能文献

两种不同仪器对肝细胞癌患者进行二维剪切波弹性成像的比较

Comparison of Two-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Between Two Different Instruments for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.

作者信息

Huang Jiayao, Zhang Xiaoer, Su Liya, Liu Ming, Xu Ming, Zhuang Bowen, Liu Baoxian, Huang Tongyi, Hu Hangtong, Xie Xiaohua, Xie Xiaoyan, Lin Manxia

机构信息

Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Ultrasound Med. 2025 Feb;44(2):209-219. doi: 10.1002/jum.16597. Epub 2024 Oct 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate and compare 2-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) measurements and influencing factors among 2 different devices and to evaluate the ability and influencing factors of these measurements to assess liver fibrosis.

METHODS

From October 2022 to September 2023, 290 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and 30 healthy volunteers were prospectively included. The 2D-SWE measurements were performed using AixPlorer V (SEmean) and APLIO i900 (CEmean). This study compared 2D-SWE measurements between instruments for evaluating the liver fibrosis stage and analyzed the potential influencing factors.

RESULTS

The 2D-SWE measurements obtained by the 2 instruments were significantly different (P < .001), but the differences were significant only for patients with stage F4 liver fibrosis (P < .001) and not for volunteers or patients with stage F0-F3 liver fibrosis (all P > .050). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that the factors independently influencing the SEmean were alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (P = .034) and liver fibrosis stage (P < .001), while fibrosis stage (P = .028) was the only factor influencing the CEmean.

CONCLUSIONS

Although 2D-SWE from the 2 different instruments was capable of detecting liver fibrosis, it yielded varying results in HCC patients. These discrepancies were predominantly observed in patients with F4 liver fibrosis but not in healthy adults or patients with F0-F3 liver fibrosis. One potential contributing factor to the differences between instruments could be ALT levels.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查和比较两种不同设备的二维剪切波弹性成像(2D-SWE)测量值及影响因素,并评估这些测量值评估肝纤维化的能力及影响因素。

方法

前瞻性纳入2022年10月至2023年9月的290例肝细胞癌(HCC)患者和30名健康志愿者。使用AixPlorer V(SEmean)和APLIO i900(CEmean)进行2D-SWE测量。本研究比较了两种仪器之间用于评估肝纤维化分期的2D-SWE测量值,并分析了潜在影响因素。

结果

两种仪器获得的2D-SWE测量值有显著差异(P < .001),但仅在F4期肝纤维化患者中差异显著(P < .001),而在志愿者或F0-F3期肝纤维化患者中差异不显著(所有P > .050)。多因素线性回归分析显示,独立影响SEmean的因素是丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)(P = .034)和肝纤维化分期(P < .001),而纤维化分期(P = .028)是影响CEmean的唯一因素。

结论

尽管两种不同仪器的2D-SWE能够检测肝纤维化,但在HCC患者中得到的结果不同。这些差异主要在F4期肝纤维化患者中观察到,而在健康成年人或F0-F3期肝纤维化患者中未观察到。仪器之间差异的一个潜在促成因素可能是ALT水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验