• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同仪器对肝细胞癌患者进行二维剪切波弹性成像的比较

Comparison of Two-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Between Two Different Instruments for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.

作者信息

Huang Jiayao, Zhang Xiaoer, Su Liya, Liu Ming, Xu Ming, Zhuang Bowen, Liu Baoxian, Huang Tongyi, Hu Hangtong, Xie Xiaohua, Xie Xiaoyan, Lin Manxia

机构信息

Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Ultrasound Med. 2025 Feb;44(2):209-219. doi: 10.1002/jum.16597. Epub 2024 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1002/jum.16597
PMID:39400409
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate and compare 2-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) measurements and influencing factors among 2 different devices and to evaluate the ability and influencing factors of these measurements to assess liver fibrosis.

METHODS

From October 2022 to September 2023, 290 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and 30 healthy volunteers were prospectively included. The 2D-SWE measurements were performed using AixPlorer V (SEmean) and APLIO i900 (CEmean). This study compared 2D-SWE measurements between instruments for evaluating the liver fibrosis stage and analyzed the potential influencing factors.

RESULTS

The 2D-SWE measurements obtained by the 2 instruments were significantly different (P < .001), but the differences were significant only for patients with stage F4 liver fibrosis (P < .001) and not for volunteers or patients with stage F0-F3 liver fibrosis (all P > .050). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that the factors independently influencing the SEmean were alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (P = .034) and liver fibrosis stage (P < .001), while fibrosis stage (P = .028) was the only factor influencing the CEmean.

CONCLUSIONS

Although 2D-SWE from the 2 different instruments was capable of detecting liver fibrosis, it yielded varying results in HCC patients. These discrepancies were predominantly observed in patients with F4 liver fibrosis but not in healthy adults or patients with F0-F3 liver fibrosis. One potential contributing factor to the differences between instruments could be ALT levels.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查和比较两种不同设备的二维剪切波弹性成像(2D-SWE)测量值及影响因素,并评估这些测量值评估肝纤维化的能力及影响因素。

方法

前瞻性纳入2022年10月至2023年9月的290例肝细胞癌(HCC)患者和30名健康志愿者。使用AixPlorer V(SEmean)和APLIO i900(CEmean)进行2D-SWE测量。本研究比较了两种仪器之间用于评估肝纤维化分期的2D-SWE测量值,并分析了潜在影响因素。

结果

两种仪器获得的2D-SWE测量值有显著差异(P < .001),但仅在F4期肝纤维化患者中差异显著(P < .001),而在志愿者或F0-F3期肝纤维化患者中差异不显著(所有P > .050)。多因素线性回归分析显示,独立影响SEmean的因素是丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)(P = .034)和肝纤维化分期(P < .001),而纤维化分期(P = .028)是影响CEmean的唯一因素。

结论

尽管两种不同仪器的2D-SWE能够检测肝纤维化,但在HCC患者中得到的结果不同。这些差异主要在F4期肝纤维化患者中观察到,而在健康成年人或F0-F3期肝纤维化患者中未观察到。仪器之间差异的一个潜在促成因素可能是ALT水平。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Two-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Between Two Different Instruments for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.两种不同仪器对肝细胞癌患者进行二维剪切波弹性成像的比较
J Ultrasound Med. 2025 Feb;44(2):209-219. doi: 10.1002/jum.16597. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
2
Assessing significant fibrosis using imaging-based elastography in chronic hepatitis B patients: Pilot study.基于影像学的瞬时弹性成像技术评估慢性乙型肝炎患者的显著纤维化:初步研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 7;25(25):3256-3267. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i25.3256.
3
Assessing Hepatic Fibrosis Using 2-D Shear Wave Elastography in Patients with Liver Tumors: A Prospective Single-Center Study.使用二维剪切波弹性成像评估肝肿瘤患者的肝纤维化:一项前瞻性单中心研究。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 Nov;43(11):2522-2529. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
4
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography with shear wave dispersion for pre-operative staging of hepatic fibrosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.剪切波弹性成像与剪切波频散技术对肝癌患者肝纤维化术前分期的诊断性能比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Sep;154:110459. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110459. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
5
The usefulness of noninvasive liver stiffness assessment using shear-wave elastography for predicting liver fibrosis in children.应用剪切波弹性成像技术进行无创性肝硬度评估对预测儿童肝纤维化的价值。
BMC Med Imaging. 2021 Apr 12;21(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00601-8.
6
Comparison of Two-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography and Real-Time Tissue Elastography for Assessing Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B.二维剪切波弹性成像与实时组织弹性成像在评估慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化中的比较
Dig Dis. 2016;34(6):640-649. doi: 10.1159/000448825. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
7
Comparison of 2D Shear Wave Elastography, Transient Elastography, and MR Elastography for the Diagnosis of Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.二维剪切波弹性成像、瞬时弹性成像和磁共振弹性成像在诊断非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者纤维化中的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jan;214(1):W20-W26. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21267. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
8
Preoperative noninvasive assessment for liver fibrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with chronic hepatitis B: Comparison of two-dimensional shear-wave elastography with serum liver fibrosis models.慢性乙型肝炎肝癌患者肝纤维化的术前无创评估:二维剪切波弹性成像与血清肝纤维化模型的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Dec;133:109386. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109386. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
9
Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.用于肝脏疾病的超声剪切波弹性成像:对该领域众多参与者的批判性评估
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Feb;37(1):1-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1567037. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
10
Hepatic fibrosis: prospective comparison of MR elastography and US shear-wave elastography for evaluation.肝纤维化:MR 弹性成像和 US 剪切波弹性成像评估的前瞻性比较。
Radiology. 2014 Dec;273(3):772-82. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132000. Epub 2014 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence-assisted multimodal imaging for the clinical applications of breast cancer: a bibliometric analysis.人工智能辅助多模态成像在乳腺癌临床应用中的文献计量分析
Discov Oncol. 2025 Apr 16;16(1):537. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02329-1.