Moynan David, Higgins Eibhlin, Passerini Matteo, Prokop Larry J, Murad Mohammad Hassan, Razonable Raymund R
Department of Infectious Diseases, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Transpl Infect Dis. 2024 Dec;26(6):e14393. doi: 10.1111/tid.14393. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). Secondary prophylaxis (SP) is not routinely recommended by guidelines on the management of CMV in SOTR but may be considered in certain higher-risk situations.
A comprehensive search of English language publications up to September 2023 was performed. The primary outcome was CMV relapse, defined as the recurrence of DNAemia or disease. Secondary outcomes included graft loss, mortality, and hematological toxicity. Meta-analysis used the random-effects model. The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (no. CRD42022357028).
Six retrospective comparative studies were included. A total of 520/727 (72%) of SOTR received SP with valganciclovir. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in CMV relapse (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-2.63). Heterogeneity between the studies was low (I = 0%, p = 0.57). SP was significantly associated with a reduction in mortality (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.07-0.54) but not graft loss (OR 0.67, 0.17-2.63). There was no significant difference in CMV relapse among kidney-specific SOTR (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.65-2.96).
Evidence from six nonrandomized studies is limited and cannot support a recommendation for or against routine SP in SOTR treated for CMV infection. Awaiting prospective-controlled trials, the decision about SP should depend on individualized risk-profile assessments by experienced clinicians.
巨细胞病毒(CMV)是实体器官移植受者(SOTR)发病和死亡的重要原因。二级预防(SP)在SOTR的CMV管理指南中并非常规推荐,但在某些高风险情况下可予以考虑。
对截至2023年9月的英文出版物进行全面检索。主要结局为CMV复发,定义为病毒血症或疾病复发。次要结局包括移植物丢失、死亡率和血液学毒性。荟萃分析采用随机效应模型。该研究方案已在PROSPERO注册(编号CRD42022357028)。
纳入六项回顾性比较研究。共有520/727(72%)的SOTR接受了缬更昔洛韦的SP治疗。荟萃分析未显示CMV复发有显著差异(优势比[OR]1.15,95%置信区间[CI]0.79 - 2.63)。研究间异质性较低(I² = 0%,p = 0.57)。SP与死亡率降低显著相关(OR 0.2,95% CI 0.07 - 0.54),但与移植物丢失无关(OR 0.67,0.17 - 2.63)。肾特异性SOTR的CMV复发无显著差异(OR 1.38,95% CI 0.65 - 2.96)。
六项非随机研究的证据有限,无法支持对CMV感染治疗的SOTR常规进行SP治疗的推荐或反对。在等待前瞻性对照试验期间,关于SP的决策应取决于经验丰富的临床医生进行的个体化风险评估。