Alcon Cory, Zoch Christopher, Luetkenhaus Riley, Lyman Emily, Brizzolara Kelli, Goh Hui-Ting, Wang-Price Sharon
Department of Physical Therapy, High Point University, High Point, NC 27268, United States.
School of Physical Therapy, Texas Woman's University-Dallas, Dallas, TX 75235, United States.
Pain Med. 2025 Feb 1;26(2):90-97. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnae101.
Priming the neural circuity likely targeted by pain neuroscience education (PNE), using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may enhance the efficacy of PNE. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of active tDCS + PNE to sham tDCS + PNE on measures of pain, pain behaviors, and cognitive function in participants with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and high pain catastrophizing.
20 participants were recruited and randomly allocated into the active tDCS + PNE (n = 10) or sham tDCS + PNE (n = 10) groups. All participants received five sessions of their assigned interventions over a 2-week period. The active tDCS + PNE group received 20 min of 2 mA, anodal current applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
Within groups, both interventions demonstrated significant improvement in NPRS, PCS, and TSK. The active tDCS + PNE group also demonstrated significant improvement in the SCWT, CTMT2-Inhibitory, and CTMT2-Set Shifting. Between groups, the active tDCS + PNE group showed significantly greater improvement on the PCS, SCWT, and CTMT2-Inhibitory.
The results of this pilot study suggest that active tDCS + PNE appeared to provide greater improvement than sham tDCS + PNE on levels of pain catastrophizing and attentional interference in participants with CLBP and high pain catastrophizing, consistent with both interventions targeting brain regions involved in those processes. Considering the differences between groups, tDCS appears to provide a priming effect on PNE.
This article presents evidence of a priming effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on pain neuroscience education in participants with chronic low back pain and high pain catastrophizing. The findings support that the combination of interventions improves pain behavior and cognitive function greater than pain neuroscience education alone.
NCT05571215, The Effect of Combining Pain Neuroscience Education and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Pain Catastrophizing, Kinesiophobia, and Pain in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain, https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05571215.
使用经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)启动可能是疼痛神经科学教育(PNE)目标的神经回路,可能会提高PNE的疗效。本研究的目的是比较主动tDCS + PNE与假tDCS + PNE对慢性下腰痛(CLBP)和高疼痛灾难化患者的疼痛、疼痛行为和认知功能指标的影响。
招募20名参与者,随机分为主动tDCS + PNE组(n = 10)或假tDCS + PNE组(n = 10)。所有参与者在2周内接受5次指定的干预。主动tDCS + PNE组接受20分钟2毫安的阳极电流,施加于左侧背外侧前额叶皮层。
在组内,两种干预均显示NPRS、PCS和TSK有显著改善。主动tDCS + PNE组在SCWT、CTMT2-抑制和CTMT2-定势转换方面也有显著改善。在组间,主动tDCS + PNE组在PCS、SCWT和CTMT2-抑制方面显示出显著更大的改善。
这项初步研究的结果表明,对于CLBP和高疼痛灾难化患者,主动tDCS + PNE在疼痛灾难化水平和注意力干扰方面似乎比假tDCS + PNE有更大改善,这与两种干预均针对参与这些过程的脑区一致。考虑到组间差异,tDCS似乎对PNE有启动作用。
本文提供了经颅直流电刺激对慢性下腰痛和高疼痛灾难化患者的疼痛神经科学教育有启动作用的证据。研究结果支持,联合干预比单独的疼痛神经科学教育能更大程度地改善疼痛行为和认知功能。
NCT05571215,疼痛神经科学教育与经颅直流电刺激联合应用对慢性下腰痛患者疼痛灾难化、运动恐惧症和疼痛的影响,https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05571215 。