Suppr超能文献

在使用右美托咪定或美托咪定与瓦替诺昔1:20组合进行镇静前后,犬对组胺和48/80化合物的皮内反应的等效性。

Equivalence in intradermal reactions to histamine and compound 48/80 in dogs before and after sedation with dexmedetomidine or a 1:20 combination of medetomidine and vatinoxan.

作者信息

Santoro Domenico, Moura Raiane A, McKenzie Stuart R, Chiavaccini Ludovica

机构信息

Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Vet Dermatol. 2025 Feb;36(1):43-51. doi: 10.1111/vde.13306. Epub 2024 Oct 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intradermal allergen testing (IDAT) is commonly used to formulate allergen-specific immunotherapy, a pillar treatment for canine atopic dermatitis. Many sedatives have shown histaminergic or anti-histaminergic effects and thus been deemed unsuitable for IDAT.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to determine whether, in healthy dogs, dexmedetomidine (Dexdomitor) or a 1:20 combination of medetomidine and vatinoxan (Zenalpha) will affect intradermal reactions compared to unsedated dogs.

ANIMALS

Ten privately owned healthy dogs were enrolled in this equivalence study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Wheal formation was subjectively and objectively assessed in conscious then sedated dogs. Dogs were randomly sedated with either Dexdomitor (dexmedetomidine [0.5 mg/m]) or Zenalpha (medetomidine [1 mg/m/vatinoxan] 20 mg/m) intramuscularly. Once sedated, five 10-fold histamine (100-0.01 μg/mL) and compound 48/80 (200-0.02 μg/mL) dilutions were intradermally injected into the lateral thorax. The study was repeated on the opposite side with the alternative sedation 1 week later. Quality of sedation, cardiorespiratory function and rectal temperature were recorded every 5 min.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the median values of the reactions with either sedative when compared to unsedated dogs. Dexdomitor and Zenalpha achieved an equivalence in both subjective and objective scoring systems for all concentrations tested. A faster median time to sedation (10 vs. 18 min, p = 0.013) was seen with Zenalpha compared to Dexdomitor. Although both sedatives depressed the cardiovascular function, such parameters were less affected by Zenalpha than by Dexdomitor (p ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Owing to the lack of effects on wheal formation, both sedatives are appropriate for sedating dogs undergoing IDAT. Although, such results should be validated in allergic dogs. Zenalpha may induce more rapid and reliable sedation than Dexdomitor.

摘要

背景

皮内过敏原检测(IDAT)常用于制定过敏原特异性免疫疗法,这是犬异位性皮炎的一种主要治疗方法。许多镇静剂已显示出组胺能或抗组胺能作用,因此被认为不适用于IDAT。

目的

本研究的目的是确定在健康犬中,与未镇静的犬相比,右美托咪定(德美罗)或美托咪定与法尼辛(泽纳法)1:20的组合是否会影响皮内反应。

动物

十只私人拥有的健康犬被纳入本等效性研究。

材料与方法

在清醒犬然后是镇静犬中主观和客观地评估风团形成情况。犬随机接受肌肉注射德美罗(右美托咪定[0.5mg/m])或泽纳法(美托咪定[1mg/m/法尼辛]20mg/m)进行镇静。一旦镇静,将五种10倍稀释的组胺(100 - 0.01μg/mL)和48/80混合液(200 - 0.02μg/mL)皮内注射到侧胸。1周后在对侧用另一种镇静剂重复该研究。每5分钟记录镇静质量、心肺功能和直肠温度。

结果

与未镇静的犬相比,使用任何一种镇静剂时反应的中位数均无差异。在所有测试浓度下,德美罗和泽纳法在主观和客观评分系统中均达到等效。与德美罗相比,泽纳法的镇静中位时间更快(10分钟对18分钟,p = 0.013)。尽管两种镇静剂均会抑制心血管功能,但泽纳法对这些参数的影响小于德美罗(p≤0.001)。

结论与临床意义

由于对风团形成无影响,两种镇静剂均适用于对接受IDAT的犬进行镇静。尽管如此,这些结果应在过敏犬中得到验证。泽纳法可能比德美罗诱导更快速和可靠的镇静。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验