• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读和实施工具变量研究:指南、词汇表和检查表。

Reading and conducting instrumental variable studies: guide, glossary, and checklist.

机构信息

Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2024 Oct 14;387:e078093. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078093.

DOI:10.1136/bmj-2023-078093
PMID:39401839
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11472180/
Abstract

Instrumental variable analysis uses naturally occurring variation to estimate the causal effects of treatments, interventions, and risk factors on outcomes in the population from observational data. Under specific assumptions, instrumental variable methods can provide unbiased estimates of causal effects. This article explains these assumptions and the information and tests typically reported in instrumental variable studies, which can assess the credibility of the findings of instrumental variable studies.

摘要

工具变量分析利用自然发生的变异,从观察性数据中估计处理、干预和风险因素对人群结局的因果效应。在特定假设下,工具变量方法可以提供因果效应的无偏估计。本文解释了这些假设以及工具变量研究中通常报告的信息和检验,可以评估工具变量研究结果的可信度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a41/11472180/02125ec94e20/walv078093.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a41/11472180/876d44f7ed63/walv078093.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a41/11472180/02125ec94e20/walv078093.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a41/11472180/876d44f7ed63/walv078093.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a41/11472180/02125ec94e20/walv078093.f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Reading and conducting instrumental variable studies: guide, glossary, and checklist.阅读和实施工具变量研究:指南、词汇表和检查表。
BMJ. 2024 Oct 14;387:e078093. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078093.
2
A guide and glossary on post-positivist theory building for population health.人口健康后实证主义理论构建指南及术语表
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Jul;60(7):564-70. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.031534.
3
Checklists and .检查表和…… (你提供的原文不完整,请补充完整以便准确翻译)
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jan;11(1):e004517. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004517.
4
Resources for authors of reports of randomized trials: harnessing the wisdom of authors, editors, and readers.随机试验报告作者资源:利用作者、编辑和读者的智慧。
Trials. 2011 Apr 19;12:98. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-98.
5
A guide to reporting studies in rural and remote health.农村和偏远地区卫生研究报告指南。
Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:2312. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
6
[Glossary of Terms for Thoracic Imaging--German Version of the Fleischner Society Recommendations].[胸部影像学术语词汇表——弗莱施纳学会建议德文版]
Rofo. 2015 Aug;187(8):638-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1553216. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
7
Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.报告肿瘤标志物预后研究推荐(REMARK):解释和说明。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(5):e1001216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001216. Epub 2012 May 29.
8
CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: explanation and elaboration.报告单病例试验(CENT)的CONSORT扩展版2015:解释与详述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;76:18-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.018. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
9
Reading between the lines: making practical sense of research reports.字里行间的解读:让研究报告具有实际意义。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jul;138(1):118-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.08.004.
10
Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide.更好的干预措施报告:干预描述和复制(TIDieR)清单和指南模板。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 7;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictions With a Purpose: Elevating Standards for Clinical Modeling Research.有目的的预测:提升临床建模研究的标准
Crit Care Explor. 2025 May 27;7(6):e1268. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001268. eCollection 2025 Jun 1.
2
Identification of effect modifiers using a stratified Mendelian randomization algorithmic framework.使用分层孟德尔随机化算法框架鉴定效应修饰因子。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 12. doi: 10.1007/s10654-025-01213-0.
3
Introduction to Mendelian randomization.孟德尔随机化简介。

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Safety of Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较安全性。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Dec 1;158(12):1303-1310. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4389.
2
Mendelian randomization.孟德尔随机化
Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2022 Feb 10;2. doi: 10.1038/s43586-021-00092-5.
3
Average Causal Effect Estimation Via Instrumental Variables: the No Simultaneous Heterogeneity Assumption.通过工具变量估计平均因果效应:无同时期异质性假设
Ann Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jan 1;7(1):27-37. doi: 10.37737/ace.25004.
Epidemiology. 2023 May 1;34(3):325-332. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001596. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
4
Association of Pretransplant Coronary Heart Disease Testing With Early Kidney Transplant Outcomes.移植前冠心病检测与早期肾移植结局的关系。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Feb 1;183(2):134-141. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.6069.
5
Impact of altering referral threshold from out-of-hours primary care to hospital on patient safety and further health service use: a cohort study.改变非工作时间初级保健向医院转诊门槛对患者安全和进一步卫生服务使用的影响:一项队列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Jun;32(6):330-340. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-014944. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
6
"Natural Experiments" in Health Care Research.医疗保健研究中的“自然实验”
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jun 4;2(6):e210290. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0290.
7
Effect of Text Messaging Parents of School-Aged Children on Outdoor Time to Control Myopia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.向学龄儿童的家长发送文本信息以控制近视:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Nov 1;176(11):1077-1083. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.3542.
8
Doubly robust nonparametric instrumental variable estimators for survival outcomes.用于生存结局的双重稳健非参数工具变量估计量。
Biostatistics. 2023 Apr 14;24(2):518-537. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxab036.
9
Preference-based instrumental variables in health research rely on important and underreported assumptions: a systematic review.健康研究中基于偏好的工具变量依赖于重要但报告不足的假设:系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:269-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.006. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
10
Effect of reductions in amyloid levels on cognitive change in randomized trials: instrumental variable meta-analysis.随机试验中淀粉样蛋白水平降低对认知变化的影响:工具变量荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 25;372:n156. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n156.