随机试验报告作者资源：利用作者、编辑和读者的智慧。
Resources for authors of reports of randomized trials: harnessing the wisdom of authors, editors, and readers.
出版信息
Trials. 2011 Apr 19;12:98. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-98.
Abstract
The CONSORT Statement was developed to help authors improve the quality of reporting randomized trials. To augment the statement we published the CONSORT explanation and elaboration paper which included at least one example of good reporting for each CONSORT checklist item. We are developing a comprehensive database of examples of good reporting for each checklist item to take advantage of the breadth and variety of trials familiar to authors and readers globally. We invite authors, editors, and readers worldwide to nominate examples of well reported items for the database.
摘要
CONSORT 声明旨在帮助作者提高随机试验报告的质量。为了扩充该声明，我们发布了 CONSORT 解释和说明文件，其中包含每个 CONSORT 清单项目的至少一个良好报告示例。我们正在为每个清单项目开发一个全面的良好报告示例数据库，以利用全球作者和读者熟悉的试验的广度和多样性。我们邀请世界各地的作者、编辑和读者提名数据库中报告良好的项目示例。
相似文献
1
Resources for authors of reports of randomized trials: harnessing the wisdom of authors, editors, and readers.随机试验报告作者资源：利用作者、编辑和读者的智慧。
Trials. 2011 Apr 19;12:98. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-98.
2
Endorsement for improving the quality of reports on randomized controlled trials of traditional medicine journals in Korea: a systematic review.提高韩国传统医学期刊随机对照试验报告质量的认可：一项系统评价
Trials. 2014 Nov 5;15:429. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-429.
3
[Randomized clinical trials (CONSORT)].[随机对照试验（CONSORT）]
Med Clin (Barc). 2005 Dec 1;125 Suppl 1:21-7. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(05)72205-3.
4
Are CONSORT checklists submitted by authors adequately reflecting what information is actually reported in published papers?作者提交的CONSORT检查表是否充分反映了已发表论文中实际报告的信息？
Trials. 2018 Jan 29;19(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2475-0.
5
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010 解释和说明：报告平行组随机试验的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):28-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
6
CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010 解释与说明：平行组随机试验报告的更新指南。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):e1-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
7
[The CONSORT statement (CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials)].[《CONSORT 声明》（试验报告统一标准）]
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2013 Jun-Jul;140(6-7):431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annder.2013.04.091. Epub 2013 May 31.
8
The adaptive designs CONSORT extension (ACE) statement: a checklist with explanation and elaboration guideline for reporting randomised trials that use an adaptive design.适应性设计 CONSORT 扩展（ACE）声明：一份带有解释和说明指南的清单，用于报告使用适应性设计的随机试验。
Trials. 2020 Jun 17;21(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04334-x.
9
CONSORT in China: past development and future direction.中国的CONSORT：过去的发展与未来的方向。
Trials. 2015 Jun 1;16:243. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0769-z.
10
Reporting of interventions in randomised trials: an audit of journal instructions to authors.随机试验中干预措施的报告：对期刊给作者的投稿指南的审核
Trials. 2014 Jan 14;15:20. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-20.
引用本文的文献
1
Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials of angina pectoris with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine interventions: a cross-sectional study.中文译文：中西医结合心绞痛随机对照试验报告质量的横断面研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 May 23;23(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01953-1.
2
Cognitive behavioral therapy for reducing fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) among breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of the literature.认知行为疗法在降低乳腺癌幸存者对癌症复发的恐惧中的应用：文献系统综述。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Feb 28;22(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08909-y.
3
Assessment of the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials of massage.按摩随机对照试验报告质量的评估
Chin Med. 2021 Jul 28;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13020-021-00475-6.
4
The effectiveness of digital multimedia presentation of trial information on recruitment and retention of patients: Protocol for a study within a trial (SWAT).数字多媒体展示试验信息对患者招募和留存的有效性：试验中的研究方案（SWAT）
HRB Open Res. 2020 Mar 30;3:10. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.12994.1. eCollection 2020.
5
Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research.系统评价综述：干预措施对改善健康研究报告规范依从性的影响。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e026589. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026589.
6
A review of prospective Clinical Trials for neurogenic bladder: The place of surgery, experimental techniques and devices.神经源性膀胱前瞻性临床试验综述：手术的地位、实验技术与设备
Cent European J Urol. 2014;67(3):270-6. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art12. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
7
A review of prospective Clinical Trials for neurogenic bladder: Pharmaceuticals.神经源性膀胱前瞻性临床试验综述：药物治疗
Cent European J Urol. 2014;67(3):264-9. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art11. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
8
Are Japanese randomized controlled trials up to the task? A systematic review.日本的随机对照试验是否胜任这项任务？一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 3;9(3):e90127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090127. eCollection 2014.
9
Assessment of the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials on the treatment of diabetes mellitus with traditional chinese medicine: a systematic review.评价中医药治疗糖尿病随机对照试验报告质量的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 24;8(7):e70586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070586. Print 2013.
本文引用的文献
1
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010解释与详述：平行组随机试验报告的更新指南
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869.
2
The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed.2000 年和 2006 年随机试验报告的质量：PubMed 索引文章的比较研究。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c723. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c723.
3
Splint for base-of-thumb osteoarthritis: a randomized trial.拇指基部骨关节炎夹板：一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 19;150(10):661-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-10-200905190-00003.
4
Quality of reporting internal and external validity data from randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention.评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架的随机对照试验中报告内部和外部有效性数据的质量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Apr 9;9:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-24.
5
What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?试验和综述中关于治疗的描述缺少了什么？
BMJ. 2008 Jun 28;336(7659):1472-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39590.732037.47.
6
Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review.CONSORT清单能否提高随机对照试验报告的质量？一项系统评价。
Med J Aust. 2006 Sep 4;185(5):263-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00557.x.
7
External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".随机对照试验的外部效度：“该试验结果适用于谁？”
Lancet. 2005;365(9453):82-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8.
8
Smoking reduction with oral nicotine inhalers: double blind, randomised clinical trial of efficacy and safety.使用口服尼古丁吸入器减少吸烟：疗效与安全性的双盲随机临床试验
BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):329-33. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.329.
Zotero 插件