Li Yike, Schwartz Alan R, Zealear David, Shotwell Matthew S, Hall Megan E, Lindsell Christopher J, Budnick Holly A, Bellotto Silvana, Kent David T
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Eur Respir J. 2025 Jan 16;65(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00901-2024. Print 2025 Jan.
Ansa cervicalis stimulation (ACS) of the infrahyoid muscles has been proposed as a neurostimulation therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). ACS stabilises the pharynx by pulling it caudally, but its specific effects on flow limitation caused by palatal, oropharyngeal lateral wall, tongue base, or epiglottis collapse remains unclear.
To quantify the effect of ACS on collapsibility of different pharyngeal flow-limiting structures.
Participants with OSA underwent bilateral ACS during drug-induced sleep endoscopy. Maximum inspiratory airflow was assessed over a range of positive airway pressures while ACS was applied. The flow-limiting structure for each breath was classified based on manometric and endoscopic findings and a linear mixed-effects model characterised their response to ACS. The influence of patient characteristics was explored with univariate models.
41 participants yielded 1761 breaths for analysis. On average, bilateral ACS decreased the observed pharyngeal critical closing ( ) and opening ( ) pressures by -3.0 (95% CI -3.6--2.3) and -3.7 (-4.4--3.0) cmHO, respectively (p<0.001). During tongue base obstruction, modelled ACS effects for and were -2.0 (-2.7--1.4) and -3.1 (-3.8--2.4) cmHO, respectively (p<0.001). Greater reductions were generally observed for other flow-limiting structures. A lower apnoea-hypopnea index was associated with a greater decrease in (p<0.01). Other patient characteristics, including body mass index, did not influence or (p>0.05).
Bilateral ACS decreased collapsibility of all airway flow-limiting structures. ACS generally had greater effects on palatal, oropharyngeal lateral wall and epiglottic collapse than the tongue base.
有人提出对舌骨下肌群进行颈袢刺激(ACS)作为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的一种神经刺激疗法。ACS通过将咽部向尾侧牵拉来使其稳定,但其对由腭部、口咽侧壁、舌根或会厌塌陷引起的气流受限的具体影响尚不清楚。
量化ACS对不同咽部气流受限结构可塌陷性的影响。
OSA患者在药物诱导睡眠内镜检查期间接受双侧ACS。在施加ACS时,在一系列气道正压下评估最大吸气气流。根据测压和内镜检查结果对每次呼吸的气流受限结构进行分类,并使用线性混合效应模型描述其对ACS的反应。用单变量模型探讨患者特征的影响。
41名参与者产生了1761次呼吸用于分析。平均而言,双侧ACS分别使观察到的咽部临界闭合压( )和开放压( )降低了-3.0(95%可信区间-3.6--2.3)和-3.7(-4.4--3.0)cmH₂O(p<0.001)。在舌根阻塞期间,模拟的ACS对 和 的影响分别为-2.0(-2.7--1.4)和-3.1(-3.8--2.4)cmH₂O(p<0.001)。对于其他气流受限结构,通常观察到更大程度的降低。较低的呼吸暂停低通气指数与 的更大降低相关(p<0.01)。包括体重指数在内的其他患者特征对 或 没有影响(p>0.05)。
双侧ACS降低了所有气道气流受限结构的可塌陷性。ACS对腭部、口咽侧壁和会厌塌陷的影响通常比对舌根的影响更大。