Suppr超能文献

mFOLFOX-HAIC联合乐伐替尼及PD-1抑制剂对比GC/GS/GEMOX化疗作为晚期胆管癌一线治疗方案的单中心回顾性队列研究

mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1 inhibitors versus GC/GS/GEMOX chemotherapy as a first line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Sun Zhipeng, Xu Hai, Yang Lei, Wang Xiaojuan, Shu Bin, Yang Ming, Ren Zhizhong, Xiang Canhong, Zhang Yuewei, Yang Shizhong

机构信息

Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Institute for Precision Medicine, Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology (Ministry of Education), Tsinghua University; Research Unit of Precision Hepatobiliary Surgery Paradigm, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai, China.

出版信息

Biosci Trends. 2025 Jan 14;18(6):599-609. doi: 10.5582/bst.2024.01286. Epub 2024 Oct 11.

Abstract

Biliary tract tumors (BTC) account for about 3% of all digestive system tumors, with rising incidence and limited treatment options, particularly for advanced stages, underscoring the need for innovative therapies. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel regimen combining hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX-HAIC) alongside lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i) compared to standard regimens of gemcitabine plus cisplatin, gemcitabine plus S1, or gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GC/GS/GEMOX) in advanced BTC patients treated from March 2019 to November 2023. A total of 89 patients were analyzed, with 55 receiving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and 34 receiving the GC/GS/GEMOX regimens. Among these, 23 patients were in the mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group, while 24 were in the GC/GS/GEMOX group. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) for the mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group was 15 months compared to 6 months for the GC/GS/GEMOX group. Similarly, the median overall survival (mOS) was 20 months for the mFOLFOXHAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group versus 13 months for the GC/GS/GEMOX group. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) for the mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group were 48.5% and 87.0%, respectively, both significantly higher than those observed in the GC/GS/GEMOX group at three months of treatment. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar between the mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group and the GC/GS/GEMOX group, at 86.5% and 84.2%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference in complication rates. Overall, mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i appears to be a safe and well-tolerated treatment for advanced BTC, demonstrating superior mPFS and mOS compared to standard regimens.

摘要

胆道肿瘤(BTC)约占所有消化系统肿瘤的3%,其发病率呈上升趋势,且治疗选择有限,尤其是对于晚期患者,这凸显了创新疗法的必要性。这项回顾性队列研究评估了一种新方案的安全性和有效性,该方案将肝动脉灌注化疗与5-氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和奥沙利铂(mFOLFOX-HAIC)联合仑伐替尼和程序性细胞死亡蛋白-1(PD-1)抑制剂(mFOLFOX-HAIC+仑伐替尼+PD-1i),并与吉西他滨加顺铂、吉西他滨加S1或吉西他滨加奥沙利铂(GC/GS/GEMOX)的标准方案进行比较,研究对象为2019年3月至2023年11月接受治疗的晚期BTC患者。总共分析了89例患者,其中55例接受肝动脉灌注化疗,34例接受GC/GS/GEMOX方案。其中,23例患者在mFOLFOX-HAIC+仑伐替尼+PD-1i组,24例在GC/GS/GEMOX组。mFOLFOX-HAIC+仑伐替尼+PD-1i组的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)为15个月,而GC/GS/GEMOX组为6个月。同样,mFOLFOX-HAIC+仑伐替尼+PD-1i组的中位总生存期(mOS)为20个月,而GC/GS/GEMOX组为13个月。mFOLFOX-HAIC+仑伐替尼+PD-1i组的客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)分别为48.5%和87.0%,在治疗三个月时均显著高于GC/GS/GEMOX组。mFOLFOX-HAIC+仑伐替尼+PD-1i组和GC/GS/GEMOX组的不良事件(AE)发生率相似,分别为86.5%和84.2%,并发症发生率无统计学显著差异。总体而言,mFOLFOX-HAIC+仑伐替尼+PD-1i似乎是一种治疗晚期BTC安全且耐受性良好的疗法,并显示出与标准方案相比更优的mPFS和mOS。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验