Hypertension Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Crit Care. 2024 Oct 14;28(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05120-w.
Sepsis and septic shock remain global healthcare problems associated with high mortality rates despite best therapy efforts. Circulating biomarkers may identify those patients at risk for poor outcomes, however, current biomarkers, most prominently lactate, are non-specific and have an inconsistent impact on prognosis and/or disease management. Activation of the renin-angiotensin- system (RAS) is an early event in sepsis patients and elevated levels of circulating renin are more predictive of worse outcomes than lactate. The precursor protein Angiotensinogen is another key component of the circulating RAS; it is the only known substrate for renin and the ultimate source of the vasopressor Angiotensin II (Ang II). We postulate that lower Angiotensinogen concentrations may reflect a dysfunctional RAS characterized by high renin concentrations but attenuated Ang II generation, which is disproportionate to the high renin response and may compromise adequate support of blood pressure and tissue perfusion in septic patients. The current study compared the association between serum Angiotensinogen with mortality to that of lactate and renin in the VICTAS cohort of sepsis patients at baseline (day 0) by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Kaplan-Meier curve analyses. Serum concentration of Angiotensinogen was more strongly associated with 30-day mortality than either the serum concentrations of renin or lactate in sepsis patients. Moreover, the clinical assessment of Angiotensinogen may have distinct advantages over the typical measures of renin. The assessment of intact Angiotensinogen may potentially facilitate more precise therapeutic approaches (including exogenous angiotensin II) to restore a dysfunctional RAS and improve patient outcomes. Additional prospective validation studies are clearly required for this biomarker in the future.
败血症和败血症性休克仍然是全球性的医疗保健问题,尽管采用了最佳治疗方法,但死亡率仍然很高。循环生物标志物可以识别出那些预后不良风险较高的患者,但目前的生物标志物,尤其是乳酸,缺乏特异性,对预后和/或疾病管理的影响不一致。肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)的激活是败血症患者的早期事件,循环肾素水平升高比乳酸更能预测不良结局。血管紧张素原是循环 RAS 的另一个关键组成部分;它是肾素唯一已知的底物,也是血管收缩素 II(Ang II)的最终来源。我们假设,较低的血管紧张素原浓度可能反映了 RAS 功能障碍,其特征是肾素浓度升高,但 Ang II 生成减弱,这与高肾素反应不成比例,可能会影响败血症患者的血压和组织灌注的充分支持。本研究通过接收者操作特征(ROC)和 Kaplan-Meier 曲线分析,比较了 VICTAS 败血症患者基线(第 0 天)时血清血管紧张素原与死亡率的相关性,以及与乳酸和肾素的相关性。与败血症患者的血清肾素或乳酸浓度相比,血清血管紧张素原浓度与 30 天死亡率的相关性更强。此外,血管紧张素原的临床评估可能比肾素的典型测量具有明显优势。完整血管紧张素原的评估可能有助于更精确的治疗方法(包括外源性血管紧张素 II)来恢复功能失调的 RAS,并改善患者的结局。未来显然需要对该生物标志物进行更多的前瞻性验证研究。