Institute of Clinical Medicine, Gastroenterology, Nephro-Urology and Surgery Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Ann Transplant. 2024 Oct 15;29:e944762. doi: 10.12659/AOT.944762.
BACKGROUND Rejection is the main cause of kidney allograft failure, and kidney biopsy is the criterion standard method to diagnose it. However, non-invasive techniques to detect kidney transplant rejection are necessary. This study aimed to evaluate urinary chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 as potential biomarkers of kidney transplant rejection and to analyze chemokine association with allograft prognosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS We collected 117 urine samples from kidney transplant recipients undergoing allograft biopsy. CXCL9 and CXCL10 levels were measured by ELISA and the ratio to urine creatinine was calculated. Histology and other clinical data were collected from medical records. RESULTS The diagnostic performance of urinary CXCL9/cre in discriminating rejection from all other histological groups showed an ROC AUC value of 0.728 (95% CI 0.632-0.824, p<0.001), and a cut-off value 0.11 ng/mmol had the best sensitivity (76.9%) and specificity (73.1%). The ability of CXCL10/cre to discriminate transplant rejection from all other histological groups had ROC AUC value 0.73 (95% CI 0.63-0.84, P<0.001), the cut-off value 0.42 ng/mmol with best sensitivity (71.4%) and specificity (84.6%). CXCL9 and CXCL10 levels were also increased in patients with polyoma BK virus, recurrent AA amyloidosis, and thrombotic microangiopathy. Patients with higher CXCL9/cre (≥0.11 ng/mmol) and CXCL10/cre (≥0.42 ng/mmol) levels were at increased risk of transplant progression to ESRD (HR 3.25, 95% CI=1.27-8.36, P=0.01), irrespective of serum creatinine at the time of biopsy. CONCLUSIONS Urinary CXCL9/cre and CXCL10/cre were able to distinguished between patients with transplant rejection and those without rejection. High levels of urinary CXCL9/cre and CXCL10/cre were associated with worse allograft survival.
排斥反应是导致肾移植失败的主要原因,而肾活检是诊断排斥反应的金标准方法。然而,需要非侵入性技术来检测肾移植排斥反应。本研究旨在评估尿趋化因子 CXCL9 和 CXCL10 作为肾移植排斥反应的潜在生物标志物,并分析趋化因子与移植物预后的关系。
我们收集了 117 例接受肾移植活检的患者的尿液样本。通过 ELISA 测量 CXCL9 和 CXCL10 的水平,并计算与尿肌酐的比值。从病历中收集组织学和其他临床数据。
尿 CXCL9/cre 区分排斥反应与其他所有组织学组别的诊断性能显示 ROC AUC 值为 0.728(95%CI 0.632-0.824,p<0.001),最佳截断值为 0.11ng/mmol,具有最佳的敏感性(76.9%)和特异性(73.1%)。CXCL10/cre 区分移植排斥反应与所有其他组织学组别的能力具有 ROC AUC 值 0.73(95%CI 0.63-0.84,P<0.001),最佳截断值为 0.42ng/mmol,具有最佳的敏感性(71.4%)和特异性(84.6%)。多瘤 BK 病毒、复发性 AA 淀粉样变性和血栓性微血管病患者的 CXCL9 和 CXCL10 水平也升高。尿 CXCL9/cre(≥0.11ng/mmol)和 CXCL10/cre(≥0.42ng/mmol)水平较高的患者发生 ESRD 的移植进展风险增加(HR 3.25,95%CI=1.27-8.36,P=0.01),无论活检时的血清肌酐如何。
尿 CXCL9/cre 和 CXCL10/cre 能够区分移植排斥反应患者和无排斥反应患者。尿 CXCL9/cre 和 CXCL10/cre 水平较高与移植物预后较差相关。