Leotti Sandra M, Wahab Stéphanie
University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.
Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2025 Oct;26(4):651-667. doi: 10.1177/15248380241286810. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
Trauma-informed care (TIC) has gained significant traction in social work over the last decade, becoming a key organizing principle despite a dearth of empirical evidence attesting to its effectiveness. Addressing this paradox, our scoping review examines TIC's conceptualization and application in the field, exploring its theoretical underpinnings and empirical support. We analyzed 131 peer-reviewed articles from 2012 to 2022, following Arksey and O'Malley's framework, with inclusion criteria focused on English-language, peer-reviewed journal articles on TIC within U.S. social work. The identification of articles involved a systematic search across three online databases-Social Service Abstracts, Social Science Citation Index, and Social Work Abstracts-using the search terms "trauma informed*" and "social work" to capture relevant articles through keywords, subject headings, and titles. Our analysis revealed a broad understanding of trauma and a tendency toward emphasizing individual-level experiences, with infrequent acknowledgment of institutional or structural trauma. While TIC is applied across diverse domains, particularly in education and child welfare, its practical application lacks clarity and specificity. Critically, we found a reliance on the perceived prevalence of trauma rather than robust research to justify TIC's adoption. The inconsistent use of theory, primarily at the micro-level, and the wide range of practices resembling established social work methods raise questions about TIC's distinctiveness and unique contribution. Considering these findings, we urge a critical reassessment of TIC, focusing on its implications for practice and research.
在过去十年中,创伤知情护理(TIC)在社会工作领域获得了显著关注,尽管缺乏实证证据证明其有效性,但它已成为一项关键的组织原则。为了解决这一矛盾,我们的范围综述考察了TIC在该领域的概念化和应用,探讨其理论基础和实证支持。我们按照阿克西和奥马利的框架,分析了2012年至2022年期间的131篇同行评议文章,纳入标准侧重于美国社会工作领域内关于TIC的英文、同行评议期刊文章。文章的识别涉及在三个在线数据库——社会服务摘要、社会科学引文索引和社会工作摘要——中进行系统搜索,使用搜索词“创伤知情*”和“社会工作”,通过关键词、主题词和标题来获取相关文章。我们的分析揭示了对创伤的广泛理解以及强调个人层面经历的倾向,而很少承认机构或结构性创伤。虽然TIC应用于不同领域,尤其是教育和儿童福利领域,但其实际应用缺乏清晰度和具体性。至关重要的是,我们发现人们依赖于对创伤普遍程度的认知,而非有力的研究来证明采用TIC的合理性。理论的使用不一致,主要是在微观层面,以及大量类似于既定社会工作方法的实践引发了关于TIC的独特性和独特贡献的疑问。考虑到这些发现,我们敦促对TIC进行批判性重新评估,重点关注其对实践和研究的影响。