• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

足月出生且有或无可检测围产期危险因素的儿童的脑瘫特征:一项横断面研究。

Cerebral palsy characteristics in term-born children with and without detectable perinatal risk factors: A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Suzuki Kai, Husein Nafisa, Oskoui Maryam, Fehlings Darcy, Shevell Michael, Kirton Adam, Dunbar Mary J

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Research Institute-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Dev Med Child Neurol. 2025 Apr;67(4):475-485. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.16111. Epub 2024 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1111/dmcn.16111
PMID:39404141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11875524/
Abstract

AIM

To compare, in term-born children with cerebral palsy (CP), the characteristics of those who exhibit detectable risk factors for CP at birth with those who do not.

METHOD

This was a cross-sectional study of term-born children using the Canadian Cerebral Palsy Registry comparing those with and without perinatal risk factors and/or neonatal symptoms for pregnancy, birth and neonatal characteristics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, CP subtype, and impairment severity. Risk factors were quantified with a CP risk calculator. Multivariable and multinomial regressions were expressed as odds ratios (OR) and relative risk ratios.

RESULTS

Of 1333 term-born children, 781 (58.6%) had complete variables for the CP risk calculator, of whom 195 (25%) had 'undetectable' newborn infant CP risk, and they did not have greater postneonatal brain injury. Focal injury on MRI was more common (OR 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-3.1) than in the 'detectable' group. The 'undetectable' group had more unilateral CP (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.6), less severe motor impairment (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.86), and were more verbal (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3.6).

INTERPRETATION

In the Canadian CP Registry, one-quarter of term-born children lacked neonatal encephalopathy, seizures, or perinatal risk factors. They were more likely to have unilateral CP, focal MRI findings, and communicate with words than children with risk factors or neonatal symptoms.

摘要

目的

比较足月儿脑瘫(CP)患儿中,出生时存在可检测到的CP危险因素的患儿与不存在此类因素的患儿的特征。

方法

这是一项对足月儿的横断面研究,使用加拿大脑瘫登记处的数据,比较有无围产期危险因素和/或新生儿症状的患儿在妊娠、出生及新生儿特征、磁共振成像(MRI)结果、CP亚型和损伤严重程度方面的差异。危险因素通过CP风险计算器进行量化。多变量和多项回归以比值比(OR)和相对风险比表示。

结果

在1333名足月儿中,781名(58.6%)具备CP风险计算器所需的完整变量,其中195名(25%)新生儿CP风险“不可检测”,且他们没有更严重的新生儿期后脑损伤。MRI上的局灶性损伤比“可检测”组更常见(OR 2.0,95%置信区间[CI] 1.3 - 3.1)。“不可检测”组单侧CP更多(OR 1.8,95% CI 1.3 - 2.6),运动损伤较轻(OR 0.76,95% CI 0.67 - 0.86),且语言能力更强(OR 2.3,95% CI 1.5 - 3.6)。

解读

在加拿大CP登记处,四分之一的足月儿没有新生儿脑病、癫痫或围产期危险因素。与有危险因素或新生儿症状的患儿相比,他们更易患单侧CP、MRI有局灶性表现,且能用言语交流。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d33/11875524/9b1ed915de23/DMCN-67-475-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d33/11875524/f7f1609b53df/DMCN-67-475-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d33/11875524/9b1ed915de23/DMCN-67-475-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d33/11875524/f7f1609b53df/DMCN-67-475-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d33/11875524/9b1ed915de23/DMCN-67-475-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Cerebral palsy characteristics in term-born children with and without detectable perinatal risk factors: A cross-sectional study.足月出生且有或无可检测围产期危险因素的儿童的脑瘫特征:一项横断面研究。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2025 Apr;67(4):475-485. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.16111. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
Cerebral palsy after neonatal encephalopathy: do neonates with suspected asphyxia have worse outcomes?新生儿脑病后的脑瘫:疑似窒息的新生儿预后更差吗?
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016 Feb;58(2):189-94. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12953. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
3
Cerebral palsy: phenotypes and risk factors in term singletons born small for gestational age.脑瘫:足月单胎小于胎龄儿的表型及危险因素
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2015 Mar;19(2):218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2014.12.005. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
4
Clinical profile of children with cerebral palsy born term compared with late- and post-term: a retrospective cohort study.足月产脑瘫儿童与晚期和过期产脑瘫儿童的临床特征:一项回顾性队列研究。
BJOG. 2017 Oct;124(11):1738-1745. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14240. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
5
Cerebral palsy in Canadian Indigenous children.加拿大原住民儿童脑瘫。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021 May;63(5):614-622. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14776. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
6
Losing a diagnosis of cerebral palsy: a comparison of variables at 2 and 5 years.失去脑瘫的诊断:2 岁和 5 岁时变量的比较。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020 Jan;62(1):83-88. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14309. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
7
Association of Gestational Age at Birth and Changes on MRI With Prevalence and Spectrum of Comorbidities in Children With Cerebral Palsy.出生时胎龄与 MRI 变化与脑瘫儿童合并症的患病率和谱的关系。
Neurology. 2024 Jul 23;103(2):e209571. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209571. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
8
Risk Factors and Outcomes for Cerebral Palsy With Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury Patterns Without Documented Neonatal Encephalopathy.无明确新生儿脑病的缺氧缺血性脑损伤模式脑瘫的危险因素和结局。
Neurology. 2024 Mar 26;102(6):e208111. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000208111. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
9
Prelabor rupture of membranes and the association with cerebral palsy in term born children: a national registry-based cohort study.足月产儿胎膜早破与脑瘫的关系:一项基于全国登记的队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2751-3.
10
Risk Factors for Term-Born Periventricular White Matter Injury in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Case-Control Study.脑性瘫痪患儿足月产儿脑室周围白质损伤的危险因素:病例对照研究。
Neurology. 2022 Nov 29;99(22):e2485-e2493. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201274. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Is it now possible to identify all newborn infants at risk of cerebral palsy?现在是否有可能识别出所有有患脑瘫风险的新生儿?
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2025 Apr;67(4):423-424. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.16159. Epub 2024 Oct 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying Opportunities for Early Detection of Cerebral Palsy.识别脑瘫早期检测的机会。
Children (Basel). 2024 Apr 25;11(5):515. doi: 10.3390/children11050515.
2
Comprehensive whole-genome sequence analyses provide insights into the genomic architecture of cerebral palsy.全面的全基因组序列分析为脑瘫的基因组结构提供了深入了解。
Nat Genet. 2024 Apr;56(4):585-594. doi: 10.1038/s41588-024-01686-x. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
3
Risk Factors and Outcomes for Cerebral Palsy With Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury Patterns Without Documented Neonatal Encephalopathy.
无明确新生儿脑病的缺氧缺血性脑损伤模式脑瘫的危险因素和结局。
Neurology. 2024 Mar 26;102(6):e208111. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000208111. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
4
A call for spatial omics submissions.征集空间组学投稿。
Nat Genet. 2024 Jan;56(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41588-023-01621-6.
5
Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination Subscores Are Predictive of Cerebral Palsy.哈默史密斯婴儿神经学检查子项可预测脑瘫。
Pediatr Neurol. 2024 Feb;151:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2023.11.016. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
6
Brain Injury Outcomes after Adjuvant Erythropoietin Neuroprotection for Moderate or Severe Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Report from the HEAL Trial.辅助促红细胞生成素神经保护治疗中重度新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病的脑损伤结局:来自 HEAL 试验的报告。
Dev Neurosci. 2024;46(5):285-296. doi: 10.1159/000534618. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
7
Post-neonatally acquired cerebral palsy aetiology: The need for classification and collaboration.新生儿期后获得性脑瘫的病因:分类与协作的必要性。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024 Feb;66(2):146-147. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15725. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
8
Classification of events contributing to postneonatal cerebral palsy: Development, reliability, and recommendations for use.导致新生儿后脑瘫的事件分类:制定、可靠性和使用建议。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024 Feb;66(2):250-257. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15710. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
9
Diagnostic Yield of Exome Sequencing in Cerebral Palsy and Implications for Genetic Testing Guidelines: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.脑性瘫痪外显子组测序的诊断率及其对遗传检测指南的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2023 May 1;177(5):472-478. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.0008.
10
New Screening Tool for Term-Born Infants Enables Update to the Clinical Practice Guideline for Early Diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy.适用于足月儿的新型筛查工具助力更新脑瘫早期诊断临床实践指南。
JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Feb 1;177(2):115-117. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.5189.