Collins R Lorraine, Thanos Panayotis K, Ashare Rebecca, Herzberg David, Silverman Robert
Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York.
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2025 Jan;86(1):8-12. doi: 10.15288/jsad.24-00346. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
The rescheduling of cannabis from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration's current most restrictive (Schedule I) designation would be an important step for cannabis research and researchers. We are researchers who have experience with cannabis research in preclinical, clinical, and policy domains and who represent a range of social science disciplines (e.g., Psychology, History). In this commentary, we share our perspectives on the history, policies, challenges, and benefits of moving cannabis from the current Schedule I designation (similar to heroin) to the less restrictive Schedule III (similar to ketamine). The rescheduling has the potential to contribute in multiple ways to research on cannabis' effects on the brain and behavior, policies for regulating medicinal and recreational use, and the use of cannabis to treat health conditions such as chronic pain. Although scientific evidence supports this rescheduling, there are challenges and pushbacks to keeping the regulations as they currently exist. Although "the devil is in the details," we present our reasons to advocate for improving access to cannabis for research.
将大麻从美国缉毒局目前最严格的(第一类)管制类别重新分类,对大麻研究及研究人员而言将是重要的一步。我们是在临床前、临床及政策领域有过大麻研究经验,且代表一系列社会科学学科(如心理学、历史学)的研究人员。在这篇评论中,我们分享对于将大麻从当前的第一类管制类别(类似于海洛因)重新分类为限制较少的第三类管制类别(类似于氯胺酮)的历史、政策、挑战及益处的看法。重新分类有可能在多个方面推动关于大麻对大脑和行为影响的研究、药用和娱乐用大麻的监管政策,以及使用大麻治疗慢性疼痛等健康状况。尽管科学证据支持这一重新分类,但维持现有规定仍存在挑战和阻力。虽然“细节决定成败”,但我们阐述主张改善获取大麻用于研究的理由。