Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2439434. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.39434.
Preclinical studies suggest that exposure to prostate-directed local therapy (LT) may influence the efficacy of subsequent systemic therapy including androgen receptor pathway inhibitors. However, there is insufficient clinical evidence to support this premise in patients with nonmetastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC).
To determine whether exposure to prior prostate-directed LT (radical prostatectomy [RP], radiation therapy [RT], or both) played any effect-modifying role in the treatment effect of apalutamide on metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with nmCRPC.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This post hoc secondary analysis used individual patient data from SPARTAN (Study of Apalutamide [ARN-509] in Men With Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer), a phase 3, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted at 332 sites in 26 countries. Between October 14, 2013, and December 15, 2016, patients with nmCRPC and a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 10 months or less were randomly assigned to apalutamide vs placebo; all patients received androgen deprivation therapy. The final data analysis was performed on December 31, 2023.
Prior prostate-directed LT.
Separate Cox proportional hazards regression models were constructed for OS and MFS, which included prior LT, treatment group, and an interaction term, in addition to a minimally sufficient set of confounders. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for MFS and OS were determined for the apalutamide groups with or without prior LT.
Among the 1179 evaluable patients included in this analysis, 795 received prior LT and 384 did not. The median age of patients with and without prior LT was 70 (IQR, 45-90) years and 75 (IQR, 50-95) years, respectively. The median follow-up was 52.0 (IQR, 51.5-52.8) months. A differential treatment effect of apalutamide on MFS was observed between patients with and without prior LT (P for interaction = .009), with greater benefits for those with prior LT (adjusted HR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.17-0.27]) compared with those without prior LT (adjusted HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.25-0.51]). However, there was insufficient evidence of a differential treatment effect on OS among subgroups stratified by exposure to prior LT (P for interaction = .23), with improved OS in the subgroup with prior LT (adjusted HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.57-0.92]) but no significant difference in OS in the subgroup without prior LT (adjusted HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.64-1.31]).
This post hoc analysis of the SPARTAN trial provides evidence of an interaction between prior LT and apalutamide in patients with nmCRPC, with a clinically significant and more favorable treatment effect from apalutamide on MFS among patients with prior LT. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01946204.
临床前研究表明,前列腺定向局部治疗(LT)的暴露可能会影响随后的系统治疗(包括雄激素受体通路抑制剂)的疗效。然而,在非转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(nmCRPC)患者中,缺乏支持这一前提的临床证据。
确定在 nmCRPC 患者中,先前接受前列腺定向 LT(根治性前列腺切除术[RP]、放射治疗[RT]或两者)的暴露是否对阿帕鲁胺对无转移生存(MFS)和总生存(OS)的治疗效果产生任何影响。
设计、地点和参与者:这是 SPARTAN(阿帕鲁胺[ARN-509]在非转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌男性中的研究)的事后二次分析,这是一项在 26 个国家的 332 个地点进行的、III 期、双盲、安慰剂对照的随机临床试验。在 2013 年 10 月 14 日至 2016 年 12 月 15 日期间,nmCRPC 和前列腺特异性抗原倍增时间为 10 个月或更短的患者被随机分配至阿帕鲁胺组或安慰剂组;所有患者均接受雄激素剥夺治疗。最终数据分析于 2023 年 12 月 31 日进行。
先前的前列腺定向 LT。
分别构建了 OS 和 MFS 的 Cox 比例风险回归模型,这些模型包括先前的 LT、治疗组和一个交互项,以及一组最小的混杂因素。确定了有无先前 LT 的阿帕鲁胺组的调整后的危险比(HR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。
在这项分析中,1179 例可评估患者中有 795 例接受了先前的 LT,384 例未接受。有和没有先前 LT 的患者的中位年龄分别为 70(IQR,45-90)岁和 75(IQR,50-95)岁。中位随访时间为 52.0(IQR,51.5-52.8)个月。阿帕鲁胺在 MFS 方面的治疗效果在有和没有先前 LT 的患者之间存在差异(交互作用 P 值=0.009),与没有先前 LT 的患者相比(调整 HR,0.22[95%CI,0.17-0.27]),有先前 LT 的患者获益更大(调整 HR,0.22[95%CI,0.17-0.27])。然而,在按暴露分层的亚组中,对 OS 的治疗效果差异没有足够的证据(交互作用 P 值=0.23),有先前 LT 的亚组 OS 改善(调整 HR,0.72[95%CI,0.57-0.92]),但没有先前 LT 的亚组 OS 无显著差异(调整 HR,0.92[95%CI,0.64-1.31])。
SPARTAN 试验的这项事后分析提供了证据,表明在 nmCRPC 患者中,先前的 LT 和阿帕鲁胺之间存在相互作用,与没有先前 LT 的患者相比,有先前 LT 的患者的 MFS 治疗效果具有临床意义且更为有利。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01946204。