Martin Melissa Lynne, Robert-Fitzgerald Timothy, Schindler Matthew K, Perrone Christopher, Schultz Guy, Lynch Selah, Mirkovic Nebojsa, Thomas Sunil, Elahi Ameena, Reid Donovan, Moore Tyler M, Baller Erica B, Satterthwaite Theodore D, Cieslak Matthew, Covitz Sydney, Adebimpe Azeez, Manning Abigail, Markowitz Clyde E, Detre John A, Bar-Or Amit, Kakara Mihir, Shinohara Russell T
Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2024 Dec;92:105919. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105919. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
Health insurance in the United States varies in coverage of essential diagnostic tests, therapies, and specialists. Health disparities between privately and publicly insured patients with MS have not been comprehensively assessed. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of public versus private insurance on longitudinal brain outcomes in MS.
Lesional, thalamic, and gray and white matter volumes were extracted from longitudinal MRI of 710 MS patients. Baseline volumes and atrophy rates of lesional, thalamic, and gray and white matter volumes were compared across insurance groups.
After image quality assessment, 376 (284 private / 92 public), 638 (499 / 139), and 331 (250 / 81), patients were in MS lesion, thalamic, gray and white matter analyses respectively. Baseline lesion volume was higher for publicly insured patients but increased at a slightly higher rate in those privately insured (p = 0.01). Baseline gray matter measurements were lower for patients with public insurance, but thalamic (p < 0.01) and gray matter (p < 0.01) atrophy rates were slightly higher in the private insurance group.
Insurance type was associated with lesion, thalamic, and gray matter volumes. The results suggest that patients with public insurance may present with more advanced disease.
美国的医疗保险在基本诊断测试、治疗方法和专科医生的覆盖范围上存在差异。患有多发性硬化症(MS)的私人保险患者和公共保险患者之间的健康差距尚未得到全面评估。本研究的目的是评估公共保险与私人保险对MS患者大脑纵向转归的影响。
从710例MS患者的纵向MRI中提取病灶、丘脑以及灰质和白质的体积。比较各保险组之间病灶、丘脑以及灰质和白质体积的基线值和萎缩率。
在图像质量评估后,分别有376例(284例私人保险/92例公共保险)、638例(499例/139例)和331例(250例/81例)患者纳入MS病灶、丘脑、灰质和白质分析。公共保险患者的基线病灶体积较高,但私人保险患者的病灶体积增加速率略高(p = 0.01)。公共保险患者的基线灰质测量值较低,但私人保险组的丘脑(p < 0.01)和灰质(p < 0.01)萎缩率略高。
保险类型与病灶、丘脑和灰质体积相关。结果表明,公共保险患者可能表现出病情更严重。