Comparison of the frequency of complications resulting from open and laparoscopic surgery for hydatid cyst.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Hydatid cyst is a benign parasitic disease that is usually asymptomatic and is discovered incidentally. The gold standard for the treatment of this disease is surgery. Recently, a laparoscopic approach has been used to remove hydatid cysts. We decided to compare this new technique with an open conventional method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients-This retrospective analytical study was conducted on patients with hepatic hydatid cysts who underwent surgery in Kashan during 2013-2020. A total of 58 patients were included in this study, 18 of whom underwent laparoscopic surgery and 40 underwent open surgery. The comparison of the two groups was performed using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

The average duration of surgery in the laparoscopic and open surgery groups was 135 and 151.6 min, respectively, which was not statistically significant (p-value = .179). There was no significant difference in terms of the need for blood transfusion, conversion of laparoscopic surgery to open surgery, anaphylactic shock, infection, and death between the two groups (p > .05). However, the laparoscopic surgery group had a significantly shorter hospital stay compared with the open surgery group (p-value < .001), and more favorite patients.

CONCLUSION

Considering the lack of significant difference between the two surgical methods and the reduction in the duration of surgery by a laparoscopic approach, the reduction in hospital stay of patients, and consequently the reduction in the cost of patients, it is expected that this method is a more suitable method compared with open surgery.