Cruz Gabriela, Melcón María, Sutandi Leonardo, Matias Palva J, Palva Satu, Thut Gregor
School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, United Kingdom
School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, United Kingdom.
J Neurosci. 2025 Jan 1;45(1):e0918242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0918-24.2024.
Brain oscillations in the alpha-band (8-14 Hz) have been linked to specific processes in attention and perception. In particular, decreases in posterior alpha-amplitude are thought to reflect activation of perceptually relevant brain areas for target engagement, while alpha-amplitude increases have been associated with inhibition for distractor suppression. Traditionally, these alpha-changes have been viewed as two facets of the same process. However, recent evidence calls for revisiting this interpretation. Here, we recorded MEG/EEG in 32 participants (19 females) during covert visuospatial attention shifts (spatial cues) and two control conditions (neutral cue, no-attention cue), while tracking fixational eye movements. In disagreement with a single, perceptually relevant alpha-process, we found the typical alpha-modulations contra- and ipsilateral to the attention focus to be triple dissociated in their timing, topography, and spectral features: Ipsilateral alpha-increases occurred early, over occipital sensors, at a high alpha-frequency (10-14 Hz) and were expressed during spatial attention (alpha spatial cue > neutral cue). In contrast, contralateral alpha-decreases occurred later, over parietal sensors, at a lower alpha-frequency (7-10 Hz) and were associated with attention deployment in general (alpha spatial and neutral cue < no-attention cue). Additionally, the lateralized early alpha-increases but not alpha-decreases during spatial attention coincided in time with directionally biased microsaccades. Overall, this suggests that the attention-related early alpha-increases and late alpha-decreases reflect distinct, likely reflexive versus endogenously controlled attention mechanisms. We conclude that there is more than one perceptually relevant posterior alpha-oscillation, which need to be dissociated for a detailed account of their roles in perception and attention.
大脑阿尔法波段(8 - 14赫兹)的振荡与注意力和感知的特定过程相关联。具体而言,后头部阿尔法波幅的降低被认为反映了与目标参与相关的感知相关脑区的激活,而阿尔法波幅的增加则与干扰物抑制的抑制作用有关。传统上,这些阿尔法变化被视为同一过程的两个方面。然而,最近的证据要求重新审视这种解释。在这里,我们记录了32名参与者(19名女性)在隐蔽视觉空间注意力转移(空间线索)和两种对照条件(中性线索、无注意力线索)下的脑磁图/脑电图,同时跟踪注视眼动。与单一的、与感知相关的阿尔法过程不同,我们发现与注意力焦点对侧和同侧的典型阿尔法调制在时间、地形和频谱特征上呈三重分离:同侧阿尔法增加出现较早,在枕叶传感器上方,处于高阿尔法频率(10 - 14赫兹),并在空间注意力期间表现出来(阿尔法空间线索>中性线索)。相比之下,对侧阿尔法降低出现较晚,在顶叶传感器上方,处于较低阿尔法频率(7 - 10赫兹),并且通常与注意力分配有关(阿尔法空间线索和中性线索<无注意力线索)。此外,空间注意力期间的侧向早期阿尔法增加而非阿尔法降低与有方向偏向的微扫视在时间上一致。总体而言,这表明与注意力相关的早期阿尔法增加和晚期阿尔法降低反映了不同的、可能是反射性与内源性控制的注意力机制。我们得出结论,存在不止一种与感知相关的后头部阿尔法振荡,为了详细说明它们在感知和注意力中的作用,需要对其进行分离。