Raza Sheharyar, Jacobs Jeremy W, Booth Garrett S, Callum Jeannie
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Canadian Blood Services, Medical Affairs and Innovation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Transfus Med. 2024 Dec;34(6):543-549. doi: 10.1111/tme.13104. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
Hospital-based transfusion involves hundreds of daily medical decisions. Medical decision-making under uncertainty is susceptible to cognitive biases which can lead to systematic errors of reasoning and suboptimal patient care. Here we review common cognitive biases that may be relevant for transfusion practice.
Biases were selected based on categorical diversity, evidence from healthcare contexts, and relevance for transfusion medicine. For each bias, we provide background psychology literature, representative clinical examples, considerations for transfusion medicine, and strategies for mitigation.
We report seven cognitive biases relating to memory (availability heuristic, limited memory), interpretation (framing effects, anchoring bias), and incentives (search satisficing, sunk cost fallacy, feedback sanction).
Pitfalls of reasoning due to cognitive biases are prominent in medical decision making and relevant for hospital transfusion medicine. An awareness of these phenomena might stimulate further research, encourage corrective measures, and motivate nudge-based interventions to improve transfusion practice.
基于医院的输血涉及每日数百项医疗决策。在不确定性情况下进行医疗决策容易受到认知偏差的影响,这可能导致系统性的推理错误和次优的患者护理。在此,我们回顾可能与输血实践相关的常见认知偏差。
基于类别多样性、医疗保健背景的证据以及与输血医学的相关性来选择偏差。对于每种偏差,我们提供背景心理学文献、代表性临床实例、输血医学考量以及缓解策略。
我们报告了七种与记忆(可得性启发法、有限记忆)、解释(框架效应、锚定偏差)和激励(搜索满意、沉没成本谬误、反馈制裁)相关的认知偏差。
认知偏差导致的推理陷阱在医疗决策中很突出,并且与医院输血医学相关。对这些现象的认识可能会激发进一步的研究,鼓励采取纠正措施,并推动基于助推的干预措施来改善输血实践。