Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, The University Hospital, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 16;24(1):1150. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06148-w.
Team-based learning (TBL) and problem-based learning (PBL) are two effective educational approaches used in medical education for increasing knowledge acquisition, learning motivation, and collaborative and communication skills among students. Few studies have been conducted in Saudi Arabia to evaluate medical students' perceptions of these approaches.
The present study aimed to evaluate the perceptions of current or previous preclinical students at the College of Medicine, Najran University (NU) about the effectiveness of PBL and TBL and to assess students' perceptions regarding the strengths and limitations of both educational approaches and their preferences.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 106 preclinical students at NU, Saudi Arabia. The survey questionnaire was validated by a pilot study and designed based on Kirkpatrick's evaluation model. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the collected data through IBM SPSS Statistics 2.0.
73.6% of participants enjoyed PBL and found it motivating compared to TBL and classic lectures. PBL was reported as more effective for knowledge acquisition (50%), teamwork (62.3%), and high academic performance (58%).
It is concluded that PBL was more favored by the students regarding the learning outcomes. TBL was reported to need more individual preparation and effort and require lecturer involvement, suggesting the need for structured facilitation in this learning approach and potentially indicating the challenges associated with coordinating team-based activities.
团队学习(TBL)和问题学习(PBL)是医学教育中两种有效的教育方法,用于增加学生的知识获取、学习动机以及协作和沟通技能。在沙特阿拉伯,很少有研究评估医学生对这些方法的看法。
本研究旨在评估Najran 大学医学院当前或以前的临床医学前学生对 PBL 和 TBL 有效性的看法,并评估学生对这两种教育方法的优缺点的看法以及他们的偏好。
在沙特阿拉伯的 Najran 大学,对 106 名临床医学前学生进行了横断面调查。该调查问卷经过试点研究进行了验证,并根据 Kirkpatrick 的评估模型设计。通过 IBM SPSS Statistics 2.0 对收集的数据进行描述性统计分析。
73.6%的参与者喜欢 PBL,与 TBL 和传统讲座相比,他们认为 PBL 更有动力。与 TBL 和经典讲座相比,PBL 被报告为更有效地获取知识(50%)、团队合作(62.3%)和高学术表现(58%)。
可以得出结论,PBL 在学习成果方面更受学生欢迎。TBL 需要更多的个人准备和努力,并需要讲师的参与,这表明在这种学习方法中需要结构化的促进,并可能表明与协调团队活动相关的挑战。