Amzolini Anca Maria, Neagoe Carmen Daniela, Avramescu Taina Elena, Mitrea Adina, Traistaru Rodica, Micu Elena Simona, Ianoşi Simona Laura, Matei Daniela
Department Medical Semiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 30;12(19):1956. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191956.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Fibromyalgia (FM) affects up to 5% of the global population and is a leading cause of significant social and economic consequences. Higher health literacy leads to better understanding of treatment plans, improved self-care, and adherence to recommendations, enhancing overall quality of life. This study aims to determine whether different aspects of the disease are influenced by patients' education level and literacy when applying the same therapy and to assess how patients' perceptions of therapy outcomes vary over time based on their educational level.
This study involved 140 fibromyalgia (FM) patients diagnosed using the 2016 ACR criteria, with 128 completing the study. Participants attended three visits over 28 weeks and were stratified into four groups based on educational level: Group 1-secondary school or less; Group 2-high school graduates; Group 3-college graduates; Group 4-university graduates. Patients were assigned to groups (n = 32, 32, 30, and 34, respectively) after the initial evaluation (T0). The treatment was assessed (T1) and followed up three months later (T2) to evaluate changes in functional status and quality of life. All patients underwent the same rehabilitation program, cognitive therapy, and kinesiotherapy.
Significant differences in disease impact on the patient's life (FIQ total score) were observed between groups from the initial evaluation ( = 0.000). The overall FIQ score was notably affected by non-pharmacological therapy in patients with higher education. These differences continued to be significant even three months after the treatment ended ( = 0.000). Functional limitations were evident from the start ( = 0.000) and improved significantly post-treatment in patients with higher education ( = 0.000). However, subjective evaluations of disease impact (assessed by the first item of FIQ) did not consistently align with objective findings (hand grip strength). Functional limitations did not significantly differ in subjective evaluations (F1Q1) across educational levels ( = 0.045), and inverse correlations were noted between functional status and SF-12 well-being components.
This study underscores that higher education enhances fibromyalgia management and functional outcomes, particularly when combined with non-pharmacological therapies. However, subjective perceptions may not always align with objective improvements, indicating that factors beyond education, such as personal and external influences, also impact disease management. Thus, improving health literacy through educational interventions could further benefit FM patients' quality of life.
背景/目的:纤维肌痛(FM)影响着全球高达5%的人口,是造成重大社会和经济后果的主要原因。较高的健康素养有助于更好地理解治疗方案、改善自我护理并遵守建议,从而提高整体生活质量。本研究旨在确定在应用相同疗法时,疾病的不同方面是否受患者教育水平和读写能力的影响,并评估基于患者教育水平,其对治疗结果的认知如何随时间变化。
本研究纳入了140例根据2016年美国风湿病学会(ACR)标准诊断的纤维肌痛(FM)患者,其中128例完成了研究。参与者在28周内进行了三次就诊,并根据教育水平分为四组:第1组——中学及以下学历;第2组——高中毕业生;第3组——大学毕业生;第4组——研究生。在初始评估(T0)后,患者被分配到各组(分别为n = 32、32、30和34)。在治疗评估(T1)后,三个月后进行随访(T2),以评估功能状态和生活质量的变化。所有患者均接受相同的康复计划、认知疗法和运动疗法。
从初始评估开始,各组之间在疾病对患者生活的影响(FIQ总分)方面存在显著差异(P = 0.000)。高等教育患者的总体FIQ评分受非药物治疗的影响显著。即使在治疗结束三个月后,这些差异仍然显著(P = 0.000)。从一开始就存在功能受限(P = 0.000),高等教育患者在治疗后功能显著改善(P = 0.000)。然而,疾病影响的主观评估(由FIQ的第一项评估)与客观结果(握力)并不总是一致。不同教育水平的主观评估(F1Q1)中功能受限没有显著差异(P = 0.045),并且在功能状态与SF - 12健康成分之间存在负相关。
本研究强调,高等教育可改善纤维肌痛的管理和功能结果,特别是与非药物疗法相结合时。然而,主观认知可能并不总是与客观改善一致,这表明除教育之外的因素,如个人和外部影响,也会影响疾病管理。因此,通过教育干预提高健康素养可能会进一步改善FM患者的生活质量。