Suppr超能文献

排便障碍综合征:一种创新机器人治疗方法的疗效及中期生活质量分析

Obstructed Defecation Syndrome: Analysis of the Efficacy and Mid-Term Quality of Life of an Innovative Robotic Approach.

作者信息

Cervigni Mauro, Fuschi Andrea, Morciano Andrea, Campanella Lorenzo, Carbone Antonio, Schiavi Michele Carlo

机构信息

Female Pelvic Medicine & Robotic Reconstructive Surgery Center, Department of Urology, Università "La Sapienza", ICOT Polo Pontino, 00161 Rome, Italy.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, "Pia Fondazione Cardinale G. Panico", 73039 Tricase, Italy.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 4;12(19):1978. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191978.

Abstract

The goal of our research is to demonstrate how the combination of Rectal wall Plication (RP) and robotic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy (VMR) results in a safe and effective operation that provides superior outcomes for patients with Obstructed Defecation Syndrome (ODS). In a total of 78 women with ODS with posterior compartment prolapse, 30 had VMR whereas 33 received VMR plus RP. We assessed VMR and VMR + RP's efficacy and safety, as well as their influence on quality of life and sexual function. At the median follow-up, both groups' POP-Q categorization scores for the posterior compartment decreased ( < 0.001). In terms of quality of life, the PISQ-12 showed an increase in sexual quality (30.12 ± 7.12 vs. 35.98 ± 5.98 in the VMR group and 29.65 ± 6.45 vs. 29.65 ± 6.45 in the VMR + RP group, = 0.041). In the VMR + RP group, the number of sexually active patients with at least two sexual interactions per month rose ( = 0.033). At the median follow-up, the ODS score values differed significantly (7.11 ± 1.65 vs. 1.88 ± 1.89, = 0.013). The combination of rectal wall plication and ventral mesh rectopexy may result in improved bowel function and quality of life.

摘要

我们研究的目标是证明直肠壁折叠术(RP)和机器人腹侧网状直肠固定术(VMR)相结合如何带来一种安全有效的手术,为排便障碍综合征(ODS)患者提供更好的治疗效果。在总共78例患有后盆腔器官脱垂的ODS女性患者中,30例接受了VMR,而33例接受了VMR联合RP。我们评估了VMR和VMR+RP的疗效和安全性,以及它们对生活质量和性功能的影响。在中位随访期,两组后盆腔的盆腔器官脱垂定量分期(POP-Q)分类评分均下降(<0.001)。在生活质量方面,性问题量表-12(PISQ-12)显示性质量有所提高(VMR组为30.12±7.12 vs. 35.98±5.98,VMR+RP组为29.65±6.45 vs. 29.65±6.45,P=0.041)。在VMR+RP组,每月至少有两次性互动的性活跃患者数量增加(P=0.033)。在中位随访期,ODS评分值有显著差异(7.11±1.65 vs. 1.88±1.89,P=0.013)。直肠壁折叠术和腹侧网状直肠固定术相结合可能会改善肠道功能和生活质量。

相似文献

10
Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse.直肠脱垂的直肠固定术
Front Surg. 2015 Oct 19;2:54. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00054. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验