Galyean Michael L, Tedeschi Luis O
Department of Veterinary Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-2123, USA.
Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2471, USA.
Animals (Basel). 2024 Oct 9;14(19):2903. doi: 10.3390/ani14192903.
Predictions of microbial crude protein (MCP) synthesis for beef cattle generally rely on empirical regression equations, with intakes of energy and protein as key variables. Using a database from published literature, we developed new equations based on the intake of organic matter (OM) and intakes or concentrations of crude protein (CP) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF). We compared these new equations to several extant equations based on intakes of total digestible nutrients (TDN) and CP. Regression fit statistics were evaluated using both resampling and sampling from a simulated multivariate normal population. Newly developed equations yielded similar fit statistics to extant equations, but the root mean square error of prediction averaged 155 g (28.7% of the mean MCP of 540.7 g/d) across all equations, indicating considerable variation in predictions. A simple approach of calculating MCP as 10% of the TDN intake yielded MCP estimates and fit statistics that were similar to more complicated equations. Adding a classification code to account for unique dietary characteristics did not have significant effects. Because MCP synthesis is measured indirectly, most often using surgically altered animals, literature estimates are relatively few and highly variable. A random sample of individual studies from our literature database indicated a standard deviation for MCP synthesis that averaged 19.1% of the observed mean, likely contributing to imprecision in the MCP predictions. Research to develop additional MCP estimates across various diets and production situations is needed, with a focus on developing consistent and reliable methodologies for MCP measurements. The use of new meta-omics tools might improve the accuracy and precision of MCP predictions, but further research will be needed to assess the utility of such tools.
肉牛微生物粗蛋白(MCP)合成的预测通常依赖于经验回归方程,其中能量和蛋白质摄入量是关键变量。利用已发表文献中的数据库,我们基于有机物质(OM)摄入量以及粗蛋白(CP)和中性洗涤纤维(NDF)的摄入量或浓度开发了新的方程。我们将这些新方程与基于总可消化养分(TDN)和CP摄入量的几个现有方程进行了比较。使用重采样和从模拟多元正态总体中采样两种方法评估回归拟合统计量。新开发的方程产生的拟合统计量与现有方程相似,但所有方程的预测均方根误差平均为155克(占平均MCP 540.7克/天的28.7%),表明预测存在相当大的差异。一种将MCP计算为TDN摄入量10%的简单方法得出的MCP估计值和拟合统计量与更复杂的方程相似。添加一个分类代码以考虑独特的饮食特征并没有显著影响。由于MCP合成是间接测量的,大多数情况下使用手术改变的动物,文献估计相对较少且变化很大。从我们的文献数据库中随机抽取的个别研究样本表明,MCP合成的标准差平均为观察均值的19.1%,这可能导致MCP预测不准确。需要开展研究以在各种日粮和生产情况下开发更多的MCP估计值,重点是开发一致且可靠的MCP测量方法。使用新的元组学工具可能会提高MCP预测的准确性和精确性,但需要进一步研究来评估此类工具的实用性。