Escobar-Bahamondes P, Oba M, Beauchemin K A
1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC),5403 1st Avenue S, PO Box 3000,Lethbridge,Canada,AB T1J 4B1.
2Department of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science,4-10J Agriculture/Forestry Centre,University of Alberta,Edmonton,Canada,AB T6G 2P5.
Animal. 2017 Jan;11(1):68-77. doi: 10.1017/S175173111600121X. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
The study determined the performance of equations to predict enteric methane (CH4) from beef cattle fed forage- and grain-based diets. Many equations are available to predict CH4 from beef cattle and the predictions vary substantially among equations. The aims were to (1) construct a database of CH4 emissions for beef cattle from published literature, and (2) identify the most precise and accurate extant CH4 prediction models for beef cattle fed diets varying in forage content. The database was comprised of treatment means of CH4 production from in vivo beef studies published from 2000 to 2015. Criteria to include data in the database were as follows: animal description, intakes, diet composition and CH4 production. In all, 54 published equations that predict CH4 production from diet composition were evaluated. Precision and accuracy of the equations were evaluated using the concordance correlation coefficient (r c ), root mean square prediction error (RMSPE), model efficiency and analysis of errors. Equations were ranked using a combined index of the various statistical assessments based on principal component analysis. The final database contained 53 studies and 207 treatment means that were divided into two data sets: diets containing ⩾400 g/kg dry matter (DM) forage (n=116) and diets containing ⩽200 g/kg DM forage (n=42). Diets containing between ⩽400 and ⩾200 g/kg DM forage were not included in the analysis because of their limited numbers (n=6). Outliers, treatment means where feed was fed restrictively and diets with CH4 mitigation additives were omitted (n=43). Using the high-forage dataset the best-fit equations were the International Panel on Climate Change Tier 2 method, 3 equations for steers that considered gross energy intake (GEI) and body weight and an equation that considered dry matter intake and starch:neutral detergent fiber with r c ranging from 0.60 to 0.73 and RMSPE from 35.6 to 45.9 g/day. For the high-grain diets, the 5 best-fit equations considered intakes of metabolisable energy, cellulose, hemicellulose and fat, or for steers GEI and body weight, with r c ranging from 0.35 to 0.52 and RMSPE from 47.4 to 62.9 g/day. Ranking of extant CH4 prediction equations for their accuracy and precision differed with forage content of the diet. When used for cattle fed high-grain diets, extant CH4 prediction models were generally imprecise and lacked accuracy.
该研究测定了用于预测采食基于草料和谷物日粮的肉牛肠道甲烷(CH₄)排放量的方程的性能。有许多方程可用于预测肉牛的CH₄排放量,且各方程的预测结果差异很大。研究目的是:(1)根据已发表的文献构建一个肉牛CH₄排放数据库;(2)确定针对采食不同草料含量日粮的肉牛,现存的最精确和准确的CH₄预测模型。该数据库由2000年至2015年发表的肉牛活体研究中CH₄产量的处理均值组成。纳入数据库的数据的标准如下:动物描述、采食量、日粮组成和CH₄产量。总共评估了54个根据日粮组成预测CH₄产量的已发表方程。使用一致性相关系数(r c)、均方根预测误差(RMSPE)、模型效率和误差分析对方程的精度和准确性进行评估。基于主成分分析,使用各种统计评估的综合指数对方程进行排名。最终数据库包含53项研究和207个处理均值,这些数据被分为两个数据集:含有⩾400 g/kg干物质(DM)草料的日粮(n = 116)和含有⩽200 g/kg DM草料的日粮(n = 42)。含有介于⩽400和⩾200 g/kg DM草料之间的日粮因数量有限(n = 6)未纳入分析。剔除了异常值、限制性饲喂的处理均值以及含有CH₄减排添加剂的日粮(n = 43)。对于高草料数据集,最佳拟合方程是气候变化专门委员会二级方法、3个考虑总能摄入量(GEI)和体重的阉公牛方程以及1个考虑干物质摄入量和淀粉:中性洗涤纤维的方程,r c范围为0.60至0.73,RMSPE范围为35.6至45.9 g/天。对于高谷物日粮,5个最佳拟合方程考虑了可代谢能量、纤维素、半纤维素和脂肪的摄入量,或对于阉公牛考虑了GEI和体重,r c范围为0.35至0.52,RMSPE范围为47.4至62.9 g/天。现存CH₄预测方程的准确性和精度排名因日粮的草料含量而异。当用于采食高谷物日粮的牛时,现存的CH₄预测模型通常不精确且缺乏准确性。