• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期卵巢癌一线辅助治疗中,不使用贝伐单抗的腹腔内化疗与使用贝伐单抗的静脉化疗对比

Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy without Bevacizumab versus Intravenous Chemotherapy with Bevacizumab as the Frontline Adjuvant Therapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

作者信息

Ting Wan-Hua, Chen Hui-Hua, Wei Ming-Chow, Sun Hsu-Dong, Hsiao Sheng-Mou

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei 220216, Taiwan.

Department of Electrical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 320315, Taiwan.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 3;16(19):3382. doi: 10.3390/cancers16193382.

DOI:10.3390/cancers16193382
PMID:39410004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11476050/
Abstract

To compare the clinical outcomes of intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy plus bevacizumab versus intraperitoneal cisplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy without bevacizumab as the frontline treatment in women with advanced ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer. Between November 2012 and January 2024, medical records of all consecutive women with stage II~IV cancer treated with either frontline adjuvant intraperitoneal cisplatin/paclitaxel without bevacizumab (IP group), intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel without bevacizumab (IV group) or intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel with bevacizumab (IVB group) at a tertiary referral center were reviewed. A total of 143 women (IP group, n = 57; IVB group, n = 23; IV group, n = 63) were reviewed. The IP group had greater progression-free survival compared to the IVB group (49.1 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 27.8 months to infinity, versus 11.9 months, 95% CI = 11.2 to 16.2 months; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.87, = 0.017). Additionally, the IP group also had a higher overall survival compared to the IVB group (not reached, 95% CI = 55.6 months to infinity, versus 38.9 months, 95% CI = 21.9 months to infinity; adjusted HR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.79, = 0.012). Intraperitoneal cisplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy without bevacizumab seems to offer a survival advantage when compared with intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel with bevacizumab in the frontline treatment of women with advanced ovarian cancer.

摘要

比较静脉注射卡铂/紫杉醇化疗联合贝伐单抗与不使用贝伐单抗的腹腔内顺铂/紫杉醇化疗作为晚期卵巢癌、输卵管癌和原发性腹膜癌女性一线治疗的临床疗效。2012年11月至2024年1月,回顾了一家三级转诊中心所有连续接受一线辅助腹腔内顺铂/紫杉醇不联合贝伐单抗(腹腔内化疗组)、静脉注射卡铂/紫杉醇不联合贝伐单抗(静脉化疗组)或静脉注射卡铂/紫杉醇联合贝伐单抗(静脉-贝伐单抗化疗组)治疗的II~IV期癌症女性的病历。共回顾了143名女性(腹腔内化疗组,n = 57;静脉-贝伐单抗化疗组,n = 23;静脉化疗组,n = 63)。腹腔内化疗组与静脉-贝伐单抗化疗组相比,无进展生存期更长(49.1个月,95%置信区间[CI] = 27.8个月至无穷大, versus 11.9个月,95% CI = 11.2至16.2个月;校正风险比[HR] = 0.45,95% CI = 0.24至0.87,P = 0.017)。此外,腹腔内化疗组与静脉-贝伐单抗化疗组相比,总生存期也更高(未达到,95% CI = 55.6个月至无穷大, versus 38.9个月,95% CI = 21.9个月至无穷大;校正HR = 0.34,95% CI = 0.15至0.79,P = 0.012)。在晚期卵巢癌女性的一线治疗中,不使用贝伐单抗的腹腔内顺铂/紫杉醇化疗与使用贝伐单抗的静脉注射卡铂/紫杉醇化疗相比,似乎具有生存优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d2/11476050/72b21f404282/cancers-16-03382-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d2/11476050/1163154a4ff4/cancers-16-03382-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d2/11476050/72b21f404282/cancers-16-03382-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d2/11476050/1163154a4ff4/cancers-16-03382-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d2/11476050/72b21f404282/cancers-16-03382-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy without Bevacizumab versus Intravenous Chemotherapy with Bevacizumab as the Frontline Adjuvant Therapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer.晚期卵巢癌一线辅助治疗中,不使用贝伐单抗的腹腔内化疗与使用贝伐单抗的静脉化疗对比
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 3;16(19):3382. doi: 10.3390/cancers16193382.
2
Comparisons of Clinical Outcomes in Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Treated with Frontline Intraperitoneal versus Dose-Dense Platinum/Paclitaxel Chemotherapy without Bevacizumab.比较未经贝伐珠单抗治疗的晚期卵巢癌女性患者一线腹腔内与剂量密集型顺铂/紫杉醇化疗的临床结局。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 20;17(10):3603. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103603.
3
Randomized Trial of Intravenous Versus Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab in Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.随机临床试验:静脉化疗与腹腔化疗联合贝伐珠单抗治疗晚期卵巢癌:NRG 肿瘤学/妇科肿瘤学组研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;37(16):1380-1390. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01568. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
4
Expert consensus: Profiling and management of advanced or metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer.专家共识:晚期或转移性上皮性卵巢癌的评估和管理。
Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2024 Jun 14;75(1):4094. doi: 10.18597/rcog.4094.
5
Phase II study of intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus cisplatin and intravenous paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as adjuvant treatment of optimal stage II/III epithelial ovarian cancer.腹腔内紫杉醇联合顺铂和静脉内紫杉醇联合贝伐珠单抗作为 II/III 期上皮性卵巢癌辅助治疗的 II 期研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 10;29(35):4662-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.1352. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
6
Bevacizumab and paclitaxel-carboplatin chemotherapy and secondary cytoreduction in recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study GOG-0213): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇-卡铂化疗和二次细胞减灭术治疗复发性铂敏感型卵巢癌(NRG 肿瘤学/妇科肿瘤学组研究 GOG-0213):一项多中心、开放标签、随机、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):779-791. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30279-6. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
7
Final report on serial phase II trials of all-intraperitoneal chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for women with newly diagnosed, optimally cytoreduced carcinoma of Müllerian origin.新诊断为最佳减瘤的 Müllerian 来源上皮性卵巢癌患者采用或不采用贝伐珠单抗的全腹腔化疗的连续 II 期临床试验的最终报告。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 May;153(2):223-229. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
8
A phase I study with an expanded cohort to assess the feasibility of intravenous paclitaxel, intraperitoneal carboplatin and intraperitoneal paclitaxel in patients with untreated ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.一项扩大队列的 I 期研究,旨在评估未经治疗的卵巢癌、输卵管癌或原发性腹膜癌患者静脉注射紫杉醇、腹腔注射卡铂和腹腔注射紫杉醇的可行性:一项妇科肿瘤学组研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Apr;125(1):54-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.12.417. Epub 2011 Dec 11.
9
Weekly versus tri-weekly paclitaxel with carboplatin for first-line treatment in women with epithelial ovarian cancer.每周紫杉醇联合卡铂与每 3 周紫杉醇联合卡铂一线治疗上皮性卵巢癌的疗效比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 21;2(2):CD012007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012007.pub2.
10
Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel versus intravenous carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy for Stage III ovarian cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.顺铂和紫杉醇腹腔内注射与卡铂和紫杉醇静脉注射治疗Ⅲ期卵巢癌的疗效对比:成本效益分析
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Sep;106(3):476-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.05.043. Epub 2007 Aug 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Intraperitoneal Carboplatin for Ovarian Cancer - A Phase 2/3 Trial.腹腔内卡铂治疗卵巢癌的 2/3 期试验。
NEJM Evid. 2023 May;2(5):EVIDoa2200225. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2200225. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
2
Real-World Data on Detection of Germline and Somatic Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic Variants in and Other Susceptibility Genes in Ovarian Cancer Patients Using Next Generation Sequencing.使用下一代测序技术检测卵巢癌患者中胚系和体细胞致病性/可能致病性变异以及其他易感基因的真实世界数据。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 10;14(6):1434. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061434.
3
Comparisons of Clinical Outcomes in Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Treated with Frontline Intraperitoneal versus Dose-Dense Platinum/Paclitaxel Chemotherapy without Bevacizumab.
比较未经贝伐珠单抗治疗的晚期卵巢癌女性患者一线腹腔内与剂量密集型顺铂/紫杉醇化疗的临床结局。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 20;17(10):3603. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103603.
4
Preoperative serum levels of HE4 and CA125 predict primary optimal cytoreduction in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a preliminary model study.术前血清 HE4 和 CA125 水平预测晚期上皮性卵巢癌初次理想肿瘤细胞减灭术:初步模型研究。
J Ovarian Res. 2020 Feb 12;13(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13048-020-0614-1.
5
Final Overall Survival of a Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab for Primary Treatment of Ovarian Cancer.贝伐珠单抗治疗卵巢癌的随机试验的最终总生存结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep 10;37(26):2317-2328. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01009. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
6
ESMO-ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease†.ESMO-ESGO 共识会议关于卵巢癌的建议:病理学和分子生物学,早期和晚期,交界性肿瘤和复发性疾病†。
Ann Oncol. 2019 May 1;30(5):672-705. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz062.
7
Randomized Trial of Intravenous Versus Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab in Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.随机临床试验:静脉化疗与腹腔化疗联合贝伐珠单抗治疗晚期卵巢癌:NRG 肿瘤学/妇科肿瘤学组研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;37(16):1380-1390. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01568. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
8
Final report on serial phase II trials of all-intraperitoneal chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for women with newly diagnosed, optimally cytoreduced carcinoma of Müllerian origin.新诊断为最佳减瘤的 Müllerian 来源上皮性卵巢癌患者采用或不采用贝伐珠单抗的全腹腔化疗的连续 II 期临床试验的最终报告。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 May;153(2):223-229. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
9
Optimal cutoff age for predicting prognosis associated with serous epithelial ovarian cancer: what is the best age cutoff?预测浆液性上皮性卵巢癌相关预后的最佳截断年龄:最佳年龄截断值是多少?
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jan;30(1):e11. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e11. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
10
Is intraperitoneal chemotherapy still an acceptable option in primary adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer?在晚期卵巢癌的新辅助化疗中,腹腔内化疗仍然是一个可接受的选择吗?
Ann Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;28(suppl_8):viii40-viii45. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx451.