• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同正畸矫治器上微生物黏附与生物膜形成的比较。

Comparison of microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on different orthodontic aligners.

作者信息

Pasaoglu Bozkurt Aylin, Demirci Mehmet, Erdogan Pelin, Kayalar Emre

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Medical Microbiology, Kirklareli University, Faculty of Medicine, Kirklareli, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2025 Jan;167(1):47-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.08.010. Epub 2024 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.08.010
PMID:39412467
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare and evaluate time-dependent biofilm formation and microbial adhesion on 6 different clear aligner systems: Invisalign (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif), Clarity (3M ESPE Maplewood, Minn), ClearCorrect (Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland), Smartee (Smartee Denti-Technology, Shanghai, China), Orthero (Orthero, Istanbul, Turkey) and Graphy (Graphy Inc, Seoul, South Korea).

METHODS

Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (ATCC 4356) were used to evaluate the microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on orthodontic clear aligners at the 0, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 168, and 240 hours. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (Greenhouse-Geisser) test and post-hoc Bonferroni T2 tests were used for statistical evaluation. The statistical significance level was set at P <0.05.

RESULTS

It was found that more bacterial formation occurred on ClearCorrect than on Smartee at 120, 168, and 240 hours (P <0.05). It was observed more biofilm formation at 168 hours on Graphy than on Smartee (P <0.05). It was found that S mutans + L acidophilus formed more biofilm at 120 and 168 hours on Graphy than on Invisalign (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated biofilm formation across all materials carries substantial clinical implications. Orthodontists and patients should remain aware of the increased risk of microbial colonization with extended aligner usage.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在比较和评估6种不同的透明矫治器系统随时间变化的生物膜形成情况和微生物黏附情况,这6种系统分别是:隐适美(爱齐科技公司,加利福尼亚州圣何塞)、Clarity(3M ESPE公司,明尼苏达州枫木伍德)、ClearCorrect(士卓曼集团,瑞士巴塞尔)、时代天使(时代天使牙科科技,中国上海)、奥美科(奥美科,土耳其伊斯坦布尔)和速达齐(速达齐公司,韩国首尔)。

方法

使用变形链球菌(ATCC 25175)和嗜酸乳杆菌(ATCC 4356)评估正畸透明矫治器在0、24、48、72、96、120、168和240小时时的微生物黏附及生物膜形成情况。采用双向重复测量方差分析(Greenhouse-Geisser)检验和事后Bonferroni T2检验进行统计学评估。统计学显著性水平设定为P<0.05。

结果

发现在120、168和240小时时,ClearCorrect上形成的细菌比时代天使上更多(P<0.05)。观察到在168小时时,速达齐上形成的生物膜比时代天使上更多(P<0.05)。发现在120和168小时时,变形链球菌+嗜酸乳杆菌在速达齐上形成的生物膜比在隐适美上更多(P<0.05)。

结论

所有材料上生物膜形成增加具有重大临床意义。正畸医生和患者应意识到随着矫治器使用时间延长,微生物定植风险增加。

相似文献

1
Comparison of microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on different orthodontic aligners.不同正畸矫治器上微生物黏附与生物膜形成的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2025 Jan;167(1):47-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.08.010. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
2
Comparison of microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on orthodontic wax materials; an in vitro study.正畸蜡材料上微生物黏附和生物膜形成的比较;一项体外研究。
J Dent Sci. 2020 Dec;15(4):493-499. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.04.011. Epub 2020 May 14.
3
Biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Lactobacillus casei, and Candida Albicans on 5 thermoform and 3D printed orthodontic clear aligner and retainer materials at 3 time points: an in vitro study.在 3 个时间点上,变形链球菌、血链球菌、表皮葡萄球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、干酪乳杆菌和白色念珠菌在 5 种热成型和 3D 打印正畸透明保持器和保持器材料上的生物膜形成:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 18;24(1):1107. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04893-4.
4
Salivary levels of cariogenic bacterial species during orthodontic treatment with thermoplastic aligners or fixed appliances: a prospective cohort study.正畸治疗中使用热塑性矫正器或固定矫治器时唾液中致龋细菌的水平:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Prog Orthod. 2018 Aug 1;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0230-4.
5
The effect of a probiotic strain (Lactobacillus acidophilus) on the plaque formation of oral Streptococci.一种益生菌菌株(嗜酸乳杆菌)对口腔链球菌菌斑形成的影响。
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2011 Feb;11(1):37-40. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2011.2621.
6
The inability of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus to form a biofilm in vitro on dentine pretreated with ozone.变形链球菌和嗜酸乳杆菌无法在经臭氧预处理的牙本质上体外形成生物膜。
Aust Dent J. 2008 Dec;53(4):349-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00077.x.
7
Live and heat-killed Lactobacillus spp. interfere with Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus oralis during biofilm development on titanium surface.活菌和热灭活的乳杆菌属会干扰变形链球菌和粘性放线菌在钛表面生物膜形成过程中的作用。
Arch Oral Biol. 2017 Jun;78:48-57. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
8
Characterization of biosurfactants produced by Lactobacillus spp. and their activity against oral streptococci biofilm.由乳杆菌属产生的生物表面活性剂的特性及其对口腔链球菌生物膜的活性。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Aug;100(15):6767-6777. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7531-7. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
9
Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus biofilm formation and metabolic activity on dental materials.变形链球菌和远缘链球菌生物膜在牙科材料上的形成和代谢活性。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2012 Mar;70(2):114-21. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.600703. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
10
[The effect of Streptococcus mutans luxS gene on mixed-species biofilm communities].变形链球菌luxS基因对混合菌种生物膜群落的影响
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2019;28(2):113-117.

引用本文的文献

1
Time-dependent microbiome dynamics in orthodontic thermoplastic materials: comparing PETG and TPU.正畸热塑性材料中随时间变化的微生物群落动态:比较聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯-1,4-环己烷二甲醇酯(PETG)和热塑性聚氨酯(TPU)
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jul 8;29(8):374. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06441-y.
2
Biofilm Composition Changes During Orthodontic Clear Aligners Compared to Multibracket Appliances: A Systematic Review.与多托槽矫治器相比,正畸透明矫治器治疗过程中生物膜成分的变化:一项系统评价
Microorganisms. 2025 Apr 30;13(5):1039. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13051039.