Suppr超能文献

如何优化创意艺术治疗以促进难民青少年的心理健康?一项德尔菲研究方案。

How to optimise creative art therapy to foster the mental health of refugee adolescents? A Delphi study protocol.

机构信息

Trinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Oct 16;19(10):e0308620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308620. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify the most recommended components of creative art therapy (CAT) to improve the mental health of refugee adolescents.

DESIGN

A three-round Delphi design is proposed. The first round will include semi-structured interviews with a panel of 12 CAT professionals worldwide and 12 refugee adolescents aged 10-24 in Jordan with a history of participating in creative arts interventions. The hybrid approach of coding and thematic analysis will be conducted to develop statements on recommended CAT components from the interview narratives. In the second round, the same and newly enrolled 24 professionals and 24 refugee adolescents will be asked to rate the statements according to their importance, propose new statements, and add comments. A similar procedure will be followed in the third round, where panellists will rate new and old statements after perusing the feedback from the second round.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

A statement will gain consensus and indicate essential components when rated 'essential' or 'very important' by > = 80% of panellists. Very important components are those with the same ratings by 60-79.9% of panellists.

RESULTS

A list of essential and very important components, perspectives and suggestions will be provided to guide practice and intervention development.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定创意艺术治疗(CAT)中最推荐的组成部分,以改善难民青少年的心理健康。

设计

提出了三轮德尔菲设计。第一轮将包括对全球 12 名 CAT 专业人员和 12 名在约旦有参与创意艺术干预经历的 10-24 岁难民青少年进行半结构化访谈。将采用编码和主题分析的混合方法,从访谈叙述中制定有关推荐 CAT 组成部分的陈述。在第二轮中,将要求相同和新招募的 24 名专业人员和 24 名难民青少年根据重要性对陈述进行评分,提出新的陈述,并添加评论。在第三轮中,将采用类似的程序,小组成员将在阅读第二轮的反馈后对新的和旧的陈述进行评分。

主要结果衡量标准

当 > = 80%的小组成员将陈述评为“必要”或“非常重要”时,该陈述将达成共识,并表明必要组成部分。非常重要的组成部分是那些获得 60-79.9%小组成员相同评分的组成部分。

结果

将提供必要和非常重要的组成部分、观点和建议的清单,以指导实践和干预措施的发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43b9/11482712/95a8de56eb66/pone.0308620.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验