Department of Mental Health and Community Psychology, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Mol Biomed. 2024 Oct 17;5(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s43556-024-00205-y.
Due to the heterogeneous nature of depression, the underlying etiological mechanisms greatly differ among individuals, and there are no known subtype-specific biomarkers to serve as precise targets for therapeutic efficacy. The extensive research efforts over the past decades have not yielded much success, and the currently used first-line conventional antidepressants are still ineffective for close to 66% of patients. Most clinicians use trial-and-error treatment approaches, which seem beneficial to only a fraction of patients, with some eventually developing treatment resistance. Here, we review evidence from both preclinical and clinical studies on the pathogenesis of depression and antidepressant treatment response. We also discuss the efficacy of the currently used pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches, as well as the novel emerging therapies. The review reveals that the underlying mechanisms in the pathogenesis of depression and antidepressant response, are not specific, but rather involve an interplay between various neurotransmitter systems, inflammatory mediators, stress, HPA axis dysregulation, genetics, and other psycho-neurophysiological factors. None of the current depression hypotheses sufficiently accounts for the interactional mechanisms involved in both its etiology and treatment response, which could partly explain the limited success in discovering efficacious antidepressant treatment. Effective management of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) requires targeting several interactional mechanisms, using subtype-specific and/or personalized therapeutic modalities, which could, for example, include multi-target pharmacotherapies in augmentation with psychotherapy and/or other non-pharmacological approaches. Future research guided by interaction mechanisms hypotheses could provide more insights into potential etiologies of TRD, precision biomarker targets, and efficacious therapeutic modalities.
由于抑郁症的异质性,个体之间的潜在病因机制有很大的差异,而且没有已知的亚型特异性生物标志物可以作为治疗效果的精确靶点。过去几十年的广泛研究并没有取得很大的成功,目前使用的一线常规抗抑郁药对近 66%的患者仍然无效。大多数临床医生使用试错治疗方法,这种方法似乎对只有一部分患者有效,有些患者最终会产生治疗抵抗。在这里,我们回顾了来自临床前和临床研究的关于抑郁症发病机制和抗抑郁治疗反应的证据。我们还讨论了目前使用的药理学和非药理学方法以及新出现的治疗方法的疗效。综述表明,抑郁症发病机制和抗抑郁反应的潜在机制并不特定,而是涉及各种神经递质系统、炎症介质、应激、HPA 轴失调、遗传和其他心理神经生理因素之间的相互作用。目前的抑郁症假设都没有充分解释其病因和治疗反应中涉及的相互作用机制,这在一定程度上可以解释发现有效抗抑郁治疗的有限成功。有效管理治疗抵抗性抑郁症(TRD)需要针对几种相互作用机制,采用亚型特异性和/或个性化的治疗方式,例如,在增效治疗中使用多靶点药物治疗联合心理治疗和/或其他非药物治疗方法。基于相互作用机制假设的未来研究可以为 TRD 的潜在病因、精确的生物标志物靶点和有效的治疗方式提供更多的见解。