Xu Wendy Y, Garmon Christopher, Retchin Sheldon M, Li Yiting
Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Henry W. Bloch School of Management, The University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr;60(2):e14387. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14387. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
To examine the effects of New York's surprise billing regulations on price changes by emergency ground ambulance service providers.
We exploited a natural experiment using a difference-in-differences design with randomization inference (RI) to examine the effects of New York state regulations on the prices of emergency ground ambulances, analyzing 2012-2019 commercial claims data. In March 2015, New York implemented a law protecting patients from surprise out-of-network (OON) balance bills, including ground ambulance services. New York's policy tied OON ground ambulance reimbursements to usual, customary, and reasonable rates that typically reflect charges. The control group consisted of similar states that never enacted surprise billing laws. Although self-funded plans are exempted from state laws, we also examined for spillover effects on self-funded plans.
Multi-payer national commercial plan claims data were used. The study sample was selected by isolating claims involving an emergency ground ambulance activation code.
The event study findings indicated that New York's law led to a continuous increase in prices, relative to controls. The law's implementation was associated with an overall emergency ground ambulance price increase of 13 percentage points (RI p-value: 0.07). We observed a 21-percentage-point increase in in-network prices (RI p-value: 0.07) and a 19-percentage-point increase in OON prices (RI p-value: 0.07), relative to controls, for fully insured health plans. Similar changes in overall prices and in in-network prices were observed in self-insured plans. Last, our study did not find statistically significant evidence of changes in out-of-pocket cost-sharing amounts under New York's regulation.
Balance billing laws based on charges can lead to price increases for emergency ground ambulance services. Legislation intended to inoculate patients from these surprise billings for ground ambulance transportation may have unintended consequences for costs of care.
Emergency ground ambulances are a major source of surprise billing. The federal No Surprises Act of 2020 excluded emergency ground ambulance services. Some states have regulations that prohibit out-of-network balance bills for ground ambulance services.
The study provides the first empirical evidence on the potential impacts of regulations on price changes among emergency ground ambulance providers. The study offers evidence of state policies' effects on fully insured plans and potential spillover effects on self-funded plans. Experiences from New York's state ambulance out-of-network billing regulation indicate that tying reimbursement policies to charges may have the unintended consequences of increasing health care costs.
研究纽约州意外账单法规对地面急救救护车服务提供商价格变化的影响。
我们采用了一种自然实验,运用带有随机化推断(RI)的双重差分设计,以研究纽约州法规对地面急救救护车价格的影响,并分析了2012 - 2019年的商业索赔数据。2015年3月,纽约实施了一项法律,保护患者免受意外的网络外(OON)差额账单影响,包括地面救护车服务。纽约的政策将网络外地救护车报销与通常、惯例和合理费率挂钩,这些费率通常反映收费情况。对照组由从未颁布意外账单法律的类似州组成。尽管自筹资金计划不受州法律约束,但我们也研究了其对自筹资金计划的溢出效应。
使用了多付款人全国商业计划索赔数据。研究样本通过分离涉及地面急救救护车激活代码的索赔来选取。
事件研究结果表明,相对于对照组,纽约州的法律导致价格持续上涨。该法律的实施与地面急救救护车总体价格上涨13个百分点相关(RI p值:0.07)。对于完全投保的健康计划,相对于对照组,我们观察到网络内价格上涨21个百分点(RI p值:0.07),网络外价格上涨19个百分点(RI p值:0.07)。在自保计划中也观察到总体价格和网络内价格有类似变化。最后,我们的研究未发现纽约州法规下自付费用分担金额变化的统计学显著证据。
基于收费的差额账单法律可能导致地面急救救护车服务价格上涨。旨在保护患者免受地面救护车运输意外账单影响的立法可能会对护理成本产生意外后果。
地面急救救护车是意外账单的主要来源。2020年的联邦《无意外法案》将地面急救救护车服务排除在外。一些州有禁止地面救护车服务网络外差额账单的法规。
该研究提供了关于法规对地面急救救护车提供商价格变化潜在影响的首个实证证据。该研究提供了州政策对完全投保计划的影响以及对自筹资金计划潜在溢出效应的证据。纽约州救护车网络外计费法规的经验表明,将报销政策与收费挂钩可能会产生增加医疗保健成本的意外后果。