• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋部骨折后院内肠外抗骨质疏松治疗的安全性:一项回顾性队列研究

Safety of In-hospital Parenteral Antiosteoporosis Therapy Following a Hip Fracture: A Retrospective Cohort.

作者信息

Abu-Jwead Alaa, Fisher David L, Goldabart Adi, Yoel Uri, Press Yan, Tsur Anat, Fraenkel Merav, Baraf Lior

机构信息

Goldman Medical School at the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 8410501, Israel.

Endocrinology, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva 84101, Israel.

出版信息

J Endocr Soc. 2024 Oct 7;8(11):bvae172. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvae172. eCollection 2024 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1210/jendso/bvae172
PMID:39416429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11481011/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the safety of zoledronic acid (ZOL) and denosumab (Dmab) administered following hip fracture in a hospital setting.

METHODS

Patients older than 65 years were treated by a fracture liaison service following hip fracture. Generally, patients who had a glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) > 35 mL/min were treated with ZOL, whereas patients who had previously received bisphosphonates or had a eGFR between 20 and 35 mL/min were treated with Dmab. Adverse events included hypocalcemia (calcium corrected for albumin less than 8.5 mg/day), renal functional impairment (0.5 mg/dL or more increase in serum creatinine) within 30 days of treatment, or a fever (>38 °C) within 48 hours of drug administration.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-eight and 134 patients were treated with ZOL and Dmab, respectively. Mean body temperature was elevated following ZOL administration (0.18 °C < .001) but remained below 38 °C. Hypocalcemia occurred in 18% and 29% of the ZOL and Dmab groups, respectively ( = .009). Renal functional impairment was observed in 9 and 6 patients (4% and 5%) in the ZOL and Dmab groups, respectively ( = .8). Pretreatment calcium above 9.3 mg/dL was associated with a lower risk of posttreatment hypocalcemia (odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.68, = .004). While the absolute risk of hypocalcemia was higher in the Dmab group, multivariate analysis did not find that the choice of drug was predictive of hypocalcemia.

CONCLUSION

In-hospital parenteral osteoporosis treatment was rarely associated with fever or renal function impairment but was associated with hypocalcemia. Posttreatment hypocalcemia risk did not vary significantly between patients receiving ZOL or Dmab.

摘要

目的

评估在医院环境中髋部骨折后给予唑来膦酸(ZOL)和地诺单抗(Dmab)的安全性。

方法

65岁以上患者在髋部骨折后由骨折联络服务进行治疗。一般来说,肾小球滤过率(eGFR)>35 mL/分钟的患者接受ZOL治疗,而先前接受过双膦酸盐治疗或eGFR在20至35 mL/分钟之间的患者接受Dmab治疗。不良事件包括低钙血症(校正白蛋白后的钙低于8.5 mg/天)、治疗后30天内肾功能损害(血清肌酐增加0.5 mg/dL或更多)或给药后48小时内发热(>38°C)。

结果

分别有228例和134例患者接受了ZOL和Dmab治疗。给予ZOL后平均体温升高(0.18°C <.001),但仍低于38°C。ZOL组和Dmab组低钙血症的发生率分别为18%和29%( = 0.009)。ZOL组和Dmab组分别有9例和6例患者(4%和5%)出现肾功能损害( = 0.8)。治疗前钙水平高于9.3 mg/dL与治疗后低钙血症风险较低相关(比值比0.30,95%置信区间0.13 - 0.68, = 0.004)。虽然Dmab组低钙血症的绝对风险较高,但多因素分析未发现药物选择可预测低钙血症。

结论

院内肠外骨质疏松治疗很少与发热或肾功能损害相关,但与低钙血症相关。接受ZOL或Dmab治疗的患者治疗后低钙血症风险无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Safety of In-hospital Parenteral Antiosteoporosis Therapy Following a Hip Fracture: A Retrospective Cohort.髋部骨折后院内肠外抗骨质疏松治疗的安全性:一项回顾性队列研究
J Endocr Soc. 2024 Oct 7;8(11):bvae172. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvae172. eCollection 2024 Sep 26.
2
Efficacy of switching from teriparatide to zoledronic acid or denosumab on bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in older patients with severe osteoporosis: a real-life study.在老年严重骨质疏松症患者中,从特立帕肽转换为唑来膦酸或地舒单抗对骨密度和骨转换生化标志物的疗效:一项真实世界研究。
Endocrine. 2023 Oct;82(1):181-189. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03431-6. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
3
Bone loss after denosumab discontinuation is prevented by alendronate and zoledronic acid but not risedronate: a retrospective study.地舒单抗停药后发生的骨质流失可被阿仑膦酸钠、唑来膦酸预防,但不能被利塞膦酸钠预防:一项回顾性研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2023 Mar;34(3):573-584. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06648-9. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
4
Zoledronic acid sequential therapy could avoid disadvantages due to the discontinuation of less than 3-year denosumab treatment.唑来膦酸序贯治疗可以避免因停用少于 3 年的地舒单抗治疗而产生的弊端。
J Bone Miner Metab. 2020 Nov;38(6):894-902. doi: 10.1007/s00774-020-01126-w. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
5
Comparison of the Efficacy of Zoledronate Acid or Denosumab After Switching from Romosozumab in Japanese Postmenopausal Patients.唑来膦酸或地舒单抗在日本绝经后患者由罗莫佐单抗转换后疗效的比较。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2023 Jun;112(6):683-690. doi: 10.1007/s00223-023-01079-y. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
6
[Analysis of the efficacy and safety of bone disease treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with denosumab or zoledronic acid].[地诺单抗或唑来膦酸治疗新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者骨病的疗效和安全性分析]
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Apr 14;45(4):345-350. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20231203-00289.
7
Zoledronate After Denosumab Discontinuation: Is Repeated Administrations More Effective Than Single Infusion?地诺单抗停药后使用唑来膦酸:重复给药比单次输注更有效吗?
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Sep 16;109(10):e1817-e1826. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae224.
8
Denosumab and Mortality in a Real-World Setting: A Comparative Study.地舒单抗与现实环境中的死亡率:一项对比研究。
J Bone Miner Res. 2023 Dec;38(12):1757-1770. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4930. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
9
Effects of follow-on therapy after denosumab discontinuation in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.地诺单抗停药后序贯治疗对绝经后骨质疏松症患者的影响。
Mod Rheumatol. 2021 Mar;31(2):485-492. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1769895. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
10
Short-term efficacy and safety of zoledronate acid or denosumab in Japanese patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.唑来膦酸或地舒单抗治疗绝经后骨质疏松症日本患者的短期疗效和安全性。
J Bone Miner Metab. 2021 Sep;39(5):824-832. doi: 10.1007/s00774-021-01221-6. Epub 2021 Apr 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of denosumab-induced hypocalcemia: a retrospective observational study of patients routinely monitored with ionized calcium post-injection.地舒单抗导致低钙血症的流行情况:一项对常规注射后监测离子钙的患者进行回顾性观察研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2024 Jan;35(1):173-180. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06926-0. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
2
Safety of Inpatient Zoledronic Acid in the Immediate Postfracture Setting.骨折后即刻应用唑来膦酸的住院安全性。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Oct 18;108(11):e1282-e1288. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad295.
3
Inpatient Zoledronic Acid and Integrated Orthopedic and Fracture Liaison Services Improve Osteoporosis Treatment Rates.住院患者唑来膦酸治疗和骨科与骨折联络服务一体化可提高骨质疏松症治疗率。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Dec 17;108(1):191-197. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac508.
4
Effect of denosumab on renal function in women with osteoporosis evaluated using cystatin C.使用胱抑素C评估地诺单抗对骨质疏松症女性肾功能的影响。
Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2022 Jun;8(2):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 27.
5
Renal safety of zoledronic acid for osteoporosis in adults 75 years and older.唑来膦酸治疗 75 岁及以上成年人骨质疏松的肾脏安全性。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Nov;33(11):2417-2422. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06499-4. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
6
Management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: the 2021 position statement of The North American Menopause Society.绝经后女性骨质疏松症的管理:北美更年期协会2021年立场声明
Menopause. 2021 Sep 1;28(9):973-997. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001831.
7
Regional and gender-specific analyses give new perspectives for secular trend in hip fracture incidence.区域和性别特异性分析为髋部骨折发病率的长期趋势提供了新的视角。
Osteoporos Int. 2021 Sep;32(9):1725-1733. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-05906-6. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
8
Denosumab Safety and Efficacy Among Participants in the FREEDOM Extension Study With Mild to Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease.在 FREEDOM 扩展研究中,伴有轻度至中度慢性肾脏病的参与者中使用地舒单抗的安全性和疗效。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jan 23;106(2):397-409. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa851.
9
Denosumab-induced hypocalcemia in patients with osteoporosis: can you know who will get low?地舒单抗致骨质疏松症患者低钙血症:能否预知谁会发生低钙血症?
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Apr;31(4):655-665. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05261-7. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
10
Secondary Fracture Prevention: Consensus Clinical Recommendations from a Multistakeholder Coalition.二级骨折预防:多利益相关者联盟的共识临床建议。
J Bone Miner Res. 2020 Jan;35(1):36-52. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3877. Epub 2019 Dec 1.