Gross Madeleine, Raynes Stephen, Schooler Jonathan W, Guo Evie, Dobkins Karen
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego.
Emotion. 2025 Apr;25(3):671-682. doi: 10.1037/emo0001434. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
The current research represents one of the first attempts to investigate how various thought qualities that naturally fluctuate across attention states (i.e., mind wandering vs. present-focused attention) impact mood. Of specific interest was whether thought valence may account for previously reported effects of attention state on mood. To examine this, an experience sampling methodology was used to capture participants' ( = 337) attention state (present or mind wandering), thought valence, and mood 6 times per day for 7 days during daily life (all data collected in 2022-2023). Participants further indicated the form of their thoughts (e.g., inner speech), as well as their clarity and interestingness. This design allowed for a conceptual replication and expansion of Killingsworth and Gilbert (2010) in which it was observed that mind wandering leads to relatively poorer mood compared to present-focused attentional states, with the poorest mood for negatively valenced wandering thoughts. Unlike their study, however, we inquired about thought valence for both mind-wandering and present moments. Our findings revealed that the relationship between attention state and mood is substantially accounted for by thought valence, while interestingness and clarity further provided significant, albeit much weaker, indirect effects on mood. Exploratory analyses suggested that the effect of attention state on mood is greatest for older people. Overall, these findings suggest that the commonly reported detrimental impact of mind wandering on mood may largely be accounted for by certain confounding variables. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
当前的研究是首批尝试之一,旨在探究在不同注意力状态(即思绪游荡与专注当下)间自然波动的各种思维特质如何影响情绪。特别值得关注的是,思维效价是否可以解释先前报道的注意力状态对情绪的影响。为了检验这一点,我们采用了经验取样法,在日常生活中连续7天,每天6次捕捉参与者(n = 337)的注意力状态(专注当下或思绪游荡)、思维效价和情绪(所有数据均在2022 - 2023年收集)。参与者还指出了他们思维的形式(例如内心独白),以及思维的清晰度和趣味性。这种设计使得我们能够对基林斯沃思和吉尔伯特(2010)的研究进行概念性复制和扩展,在他们的研究中观察到,与专注当下的注意力状态相比,思绪游荡会导致相对较差的情绪,而负性思维效价的游荡思绪对应的情绪最差。然而,与他们的研究不同的是,我们同时询问了思绪游荡和专注当下时刻的思维效价。我们的研究结果表明,注意力状态与情绪之间的关系在很大程度上由思维效价所解释,而趣味性和清晰度虽然对情绪的间接影响较弱,但也具有显著作用。探索性分析表明,注意力状态对情绪的影响在老年人中最为明显。总体而言,这些研究结果表明,通常报道的思绪游荡对情绪的有害影响可能在很大程度上是由某些混杂变量造成的。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)