Suppr超能文献

富血小板血浆增强技术在半月板修复中的应用失败率低于对照组:一项基于荟萃分析的系统评价

The Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma Augmentation in Meniscus Repair Results in a Lower Failure Rate than in the Control Group: A Systematic Review From Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Sakti Muhammad, Paturusi Idrus Andi, Singjie Leonard Christianto, Kusuma Samuel Andi

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.

Atma Jaya Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.

出版信息

Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Apr 9;6(4):100934. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100934. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an augmentation in meniscus repair.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline (via EBSCO), ProQuest, and ScienceDirect from January to February 2023 was conducted using the terms "meniscus repair," "PRP," and "meniscus tear." Meta-analyses that investigated the rate of failure after meniscus repair were included. Studies before 2003, not in English, associated procedures during surgery, and animal studies were excluded. The included studies underwent quality appraisal and risk of bias assessment. Data were extracted from each study's text, figures, tables, and associated supplementary files and then analyzed qualitatively.

RESULTS

The failure rate is lower in the PRP augmentation group compared with the group without augmentation, with a mean difference of 0.42, 0.50, and 0.43. Visual analog scale score was also found to be significantly lower in the treatment group, with a mean difference of 0.40, 0.76, and 6.69. However, only mean differences in Lysholm score in one of the included studies were found significant regarding functional outcomes, which can be found in the Xie et al. study with a mean difference of 3.06.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found that meniscal repairs augmented with PRP have a lower failure rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level III-IV studies.

摘要

目的

探讨富血小板血浆(PRP)在半月板修复中作为增强剂的疗效。

方法

于2023年1月至2月,使用“半月板修复”“PRP”和“半月板撕裂”等术语,对PubMed、Medline(通过EBSCO)、ProQuest和ScienceDirect进行全面检索。纳入了调查半月板修复后失败率的荟萃分析。排除2003年以前的研究、非英文研究、手术相关操作研究以及动物研究。对纳入的研究进行质量评估和偏倚风险评估。从每项研究的文本、图表及相关补充文件中提取数据,然后进行定性分析。

结果

与未使用增强剂的组相比,PRP增强组的失败率更低,平均差异分别为0.42、0.50和0.43。还发现治疗组的视觉模拟量表评分显著更低,平均差异分别为0.40、0.76和6.69。然而,在所纳入的研究中,仅一项研究中关于功能结局的Lysholm评分平均差异具有显著性,可在谢等人的研究中找到,平均差异为3.06。

结论

在本研究中,我们发现使用PRP增强的半月板修复失败率更低。

证据水平

四级,对三级至四级研究的系统评价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b576/11480798/71188baedce7/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验