Harth Sebastian, Roller Fritz Christian, Brose Alexander, Kaya Hasan Emin, Zeppernick Felix, Meinhold-Heerlein Ivo, Krombach Gabriele Anja
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Görükle Campus, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Türkiye.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 2;11:1468860. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1468860. eCollection 2024.
This study aimed to analyze the prevalence and clinical significance of incidental findings on MRI for endometriosis. Differences between patients with and without evidence of deep infiltrating endometriosis on MRI were to be examined.
This was a retrospective, descriptive cross-sectional single-center study. All patients who received a pelvic MRI for endometriosis between April 2021 and February 2023 were included. The presence and frequency of incidental findings were noted after review of all MR images and radiology reports. The potential clinical significance of the findings was analyzed. Differences in the frequency of incidental findings between patients with and without evidence of deep infiltrating endometriosis on MRI were evaluated, utilizing the Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney -test.
303 consecutive patients (mean age, 33.4 years ± 8.3) were evaluated. Incidental findings were noted in 299/303 (98.7%) patients. Most frequently, ossification of the hip acetabular rim and degenerative changes of the lumbar spine were noted. In 25/303 (8.3%) patients, incidental findings had high clinical significance. For specific incidental findings, significantly higher prevalences were found in patients with than in patients without evidence of deep infiltrating endometriosis on MRI (hip acetabular rim ossification, = 0.041; annulus fibrosus fissures, = 0.006; gallstones, = 0.042).
Incidental findings are very common on pelvic MRI for endometriosis. The detection of incidental findings can lead to the diagnosis of relevant diseases and thus enable early treatment. On the other hand, many incidental findings have no, only minor, or uncertain consequences.
本研究旨在分析子宫内膜异位症磁共振成像(MRI)偶然发现的患病率及临床意义。研究将对MRI显示有和无深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症证据的患者进行差异检查。
这是一项回顾性、描述性横断面单中心研究。纳入2021年4月至2023年2月期间因子宫内膜异位症接受盆腔MRI检查的所有患者。在查看所有MR图像和放射学报告后,记录偶然发现的存在情况和频率,并分析这些发现的潜在临床意义。利用卡方检验、费舍尔精确检验和曼-惠特尼检验评估MRI显示有和无深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症证据的患者之间偶然发现频率的差异。
共评估了303例连续患者(平均年龄33.4岁±8.3岁)。299/303例(98.7%)患者有偶然发现。最常见的是髋关节髋臼缘骨化和腰椎退行性改变。25/303例(8.3%)患者的偶然发现具有较高临床意义。对于特定的偶然发现,MRI显示有深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症证据的患者患病率显著高于无该证据的患者(髋关节髋臼缘骨化,P = 0.041;纤维环裂隙,P = 0.006;胆结石,P = 0.042)。
子宫内膜异位症盆腔MRI偶然发现非常常见。偶然发现的检测可导致相关疾病的诊断,从而实现早期治疗。另一方面,许多偶然发现没有后果、只有轻微后果或后果不确定。