• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者和医疗保健专业人员在线骨关节炎信息的质量和文化安全性:内容分析。

The Quality and Cultural Safety of Online Osteoarthritis Information for Affected Persons and Health Care Professionals: Content Analysis.

机构信息

University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

William Osler Health System, Brampton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 18;26:e57698. doi: 10.2196/57698.

DOI:10.2196/57698
PMID:39422989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11530738/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis is more prevalent and severe among women than among men, but women are less likely to access early diagnosis and first-line management, particularly racialized immigrant women. Previous research advocated for greater access to culturally safe osteoarthritis information for both diverse women and health care professionals. The internet can reduce disparities by facilitating access to health information, but online materials can vary in quality.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the quality and cultural safety of online osteoarthritis materials for persons affected by osteoarthritis and health care professionals.

METHODS

Content analysis was used to describe publicly available materials on osteoarthritis first-line management developed by Canadian organizations for affected persons or health care professionals. Searching, screening, and data extraction were performed in triplicate. We identified materials by searching Google, MEDLINE, and references of osteoarthritis-relevant guidelines and policies, and consulting our research team and collaborators. We assessed quality using DISCERN (University of Oxford) and a compiled framework for affected persons and health care professionals. We compiled frameworks to assess cultural safety. We derived an overall score, categorized as low (<50%), moderate (50%-69%), or high (≥70%+) for criteria met.

RESULTS

After screening 176 items and eliminating 129, we included 47 osteoarthritis materials published between 2013 and 2023. Of those, 43 were for persons with osteoarthritis, most were developed by charities (n=31, 72.1%), based on expert advice (n=16, 55.2%), and in the format of booklets (n=15, 34.9%) or text on web pages (n=10, 23.3%). Of those, 23.3% (10/43) low, 46.5% (20/43) moderate, and 30.2% (13/43) high scored quality; and 25.6% (11/43), 48.8% (21/43), and 25.6% (11/43) were rated low, moderate, and high cultural safety, respectively. Of the 47 included osteoarthritis materials, 4 were for health care professionals. They were developed by a consortium (2/4, 50%), a charity (1/4, 25%), and a professional society (1/4, 25%), and largely based on expert advice (3/4, 75%). The format included infographics (3/4, 75%) and text on web pages (1/4, 25%). Of those, 25% (1/4), 25% (1/4), and 50% (2/4) were rated low, moderate, and high quality, respectively; and all were rated low for cultural safety. Quality and cultural safety did not appear to be associated with the characteristics of osteoarthritis materials (eg, type of developer, development method, and format).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, included osteoarthritis materials for persons with osteoarthritis and health care professionals were of low to moderate quality and cultural safety. These findings reveal the need for further efforts to improve existing or develop new osteoarthritis materials for both affected persons, including ethnoculturally diverse immigrant women, and health care professionals. Further research is needed to assess the quality and cultural safety of osteoarthritis materials developed by organizations outside of Canada and to establish a framework or instrument to assess cultural safety in the osteoarthritis context.

摘要

背景

骨关节炎在女性中的患病率和严重程度均高于男性,但女性获得早期诊断和一线治疗的机会较少,尤其是族裔化的移民女性。先前的研究主张为不同族裔的女性和医疗保健专业人员提供更多的文化安全的骨关节炎信息。互联网可以通过促进获取健康信息来减少差异,但在线材料的质量可能存在差异。

目的

本研究旨在评估针对受骨关节炎影响的个人和医疗保健专业人员的加拿大组织开发的一线管理骨关节炎的在线材料的质量和文化安全性。

方法

使用内容分析法描述针对受骨关节炎影响的个人或医疗保健专业人员开发的加拿大组织的一线管理骨关节炎的公开可用材料。通过 Google、MEDLINE 搜索以及骨关节炎相关指南和政策的参考文献进行搜索、筛选和数据提取,并由三人小组进行。我们通过搜索骨关节炎相关指南和政策的参考文献、咨询我们的研究团队和合作者来确定材料。我们使用 DISCERN(牛津大学)和针对受影响者和医疗保健专业人员编制的框架来评估质量。我们编制了评估文化安全性的框架。我们得出了一个总分,根据符合标准的情况分为低(<50%)、中(50%-69%)或高(≥70%+)。

结果

在筛选了 176 个项目并排除了 129 个项目后,我们纳入了 47 份发表于 2013 年至 2023 年之间的骨关节炎材料。其中,43 份是针对患有骨关节炎的个人的,大多数是由慈善机构(n=31,72.1%)开发的,基于专家建议(n=16,55.2%),并采用小册子(n=15,34.9%)或网页上的文本格式(n=10,23.3%)。其中,23.3%(10/43)的质量得分为低,46.5%(20/43)的质量得分为中,30.2%(13/43)的质量得分为高;25.6%(11/43)、48.8%(21/43)和 25.6%(11/43)的文化安全性分别为低、中、高。在纳入的 47 份骨关节炎材料中,有 4 份是针对医疗保健专业人员的。它们是由一个联盟(2/4,50%)、一个慈善机构(1/4,25%)和一个专业协会(1/4,25%)开发的,主要基于专家建议(3/4,75%)。格式包括信息图表(3/4,75%)和网页上的文本(1/4,25%)。其中,25%(1/4)、25%(1/4)和 50%(2/4)的质量分别评为低、中、高;并且所有材料的文化安全性都被评为低。质量和文化安全性似乎与骨关节炎材料的特征(例如,开发者类型、开发方法和格式)无关。

结论

总体而言,针对患有骨关节炎的个人和医疗保健专业人员的骨关节炎材料质量和文化安全性为低至中。这些发现表明,需要进一步努力,为受影响者,包括族裔化的移民女性,以及医疗保健专业人员提供现有的或新的骨关节炎材料。需要进一步研究以评估由加拿大以外的组织开发的骨关节炎材料的质量和文化安全性,并建立一个框架或工具来评估骨关节炎背景下的文化安全性。

相似文献

1
The Quality and Cultural Safety of Online Osteoarthritis Information for Affected Persons and Health Care Professionals: Content Analysis.患者和医疗保健专业人员在线骨关节炎信息的质量和文化安全性:内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 18;26:e57698. doi: 10.2196/57698.
2
Policies in Canada fail to address disparities in access to person-centred osteoarthritis care: a content analysis.加拿大的政策未能解决获得以患者为中心的骨关节炎护理方面的差距:内容分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10966-5.
3
Cultural competence education for health professionals.针对卫生专业人员的文化能力教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 5;2014(5):CD009405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009405.pub2.
4
Multi-level strategies to improve equitable timely person-centred osteoarthritis care for diverse women: qualitative interviews with women and healthcare professionals.多层面策略提高不同女性公平及时的以患者为中心的骨关节炎护理:对女性和医疗保健专业人员的定性访谈。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Oct 7;22(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02026-x.
5
Identifying strategies that support equitable person-centred osteoarthritis care for diverse women: content analysis of guidelines.确定支持不同女性获得公平的以患者为中心的骨关节炎护理的策略:指南的内容分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Sep 14;24(1):734. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06877-x.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.常规产前服务的提供与接受情况:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012392.pub2.
9
Priority strategies to reduce socio-gendered inequities in access to person-centred osteoarthritis care: Delphi survey.减少以患者为中心的骨关节炎护理服务获取方面的社会性别不平等的优先策略:德尔菲调查
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 19;14(2):e080301. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080301.
10
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共四部分,第二部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between the uric acid-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and osteoarthritis risk in U.S. adults: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 1999-2016.美国成年人尿酸与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比率和骨关节炎风险之间的关联:一项基于1999 - 2016年美国国家健康与营养检查调查的横断面研究
Lipids Health Dis. 2025 May 26;24(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12944-025-02618-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Raising awareness about physical activity's role in reducing cancer risk: qualitative interviews with immigrant women and community agency managers.提高对体育活动在降低癌症风险中作用的认识:对移民妇女和社区机构管理人员的定性访谈
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 31;24(1):2072. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19612-5.
2
Policies in Canada fail to address disparities in access to person-centred osteoarthritis care: a content analysis.加拿大的政策未能解决获得以患者为中心的骨关节炎护理方面的差距:内容分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10966-5.
3
Priority strategies to reduce socio-gendered inequities in access to person-centred osteoarthritis care: Delphi survey.减少以患者为中心的骨关节炎护理服务获取方面的社会性别不平等的优先策略:德尔菲调查
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 19;14(2):e080301. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080301.
4
Multi-level strategies to improve equitable timely person-centred osteoarthritis care for diverse women: qualitative interviews with women and healthcare professionals.多层面策略提高不同女性公平及时的以患者为中心的骨关节炎护理:对女性和医疗保健专业人员的定性访谈。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Oct 7;22(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02026-x.
5
Identifying strategies that support equitable person-centred osteoarthritis care for diverse women: content analysis of guidelines.确定支持不同女性获得公平的以患者为中心的骨关节炎护理的策略:指南的内容分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Sep 14;24(1):734. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06877-x.
6
Online resources for information on shoulder arthroplasty: an assessment of quality and readability.关于肩关节置换术信息的在线资源:质量与可读性评估
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Sep;26(3):238-244. doi: 10.5397/cise.2023.00290. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
7
On the advantages and disadvantages of virtual continuing medical education: a scoping review.虚拟继续医学教育的优缺点:范围综述。
Can Med Educ J. 2023 Jun 27;14(3):41-74. doi: 10.36834/cmej.75681. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Impacts of the Internet on Health Inequality and Healthcare Access: A Cross-Country Study.互联网对健康不平等和医疗保健可及性的影响:一项跨国研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;10:935608. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.935608. eCollection 2022.
9
Digital self-management interventions for osteoarthritis: a systematic scoping review of intervention characteristics, adherence and attrition.骨关节炎的数字自我管理干预措施:干预特征、依从性和损耗的系统综述
Arch Public Health. 2022 Mar 31;80(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00854-x.
10
Prevalence Trends of Site-Specific Osteoarthritis From 1990 to 2019: Findings From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.1990 年至 2019 年特定部位骨关节炎的流行趋势:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的结果。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022 Jul;74(7):1172-1183. doi: 10.1002/art.42089. Epub 2022 Jun 2.