Key Laboratory of Basic and Application Research of Beiyao (Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine), Ministry of Education, 24 Heping Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150040, China.
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510405, China.
J Ethnopharmacol. 2025 Jan 30;337(Pt 3):118951. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2024.118951. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
Cattle bile Arisaema (CBA) and Pig bile Arisaema (PBA) are both processed products fermented from Arisaema erubescens (Wall.) Schott and animal bile, which are recorded in China Pharmacopoeia. Traditionally, bile Arisaema was often used for clearing heat and eliminating phlegm, calming wind and calming panic. Modern pharmacological researches suggest that both two drugs exert an antipyretic effect, while there is lack of the systematical and comparative evidence on underlying mechanism.
To comprehensively clarify the differences and underlying mechanisms of antipyretic effect of the two drugs.
In this study, an accurate and reliable detection method based on ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC-TQ MS) for comparing the content difference of bile acids from the two drugs was successfully established and applied. Besides, a dry yeast-induced fever rat model was established, and rectal temperature and content of pyrogenic cytokines were conducted to evaluate the antipyretic effect of CBA and PBA. Serum and hypothalamus untargeted metabolomics analysis based on ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole-time of flight-mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS) technology were performed for elucidating the changes of metabolic profile.
The results indicated that CBA and PBA both exerted a significantly antipyretic effect, but CBA showed the characteristic of quicker onset and longer duration than that of PBA. The ELISA and western blotting analysis exhibited that the underlying antipyretic mechanism of the two drugs was closely associated with inhibiting inflammation through regulating TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway. Moreover, the metabolism pathway analysis revealed that lipid metabolism and amino acid metabolism were greatly disturbed, which showed a certain correlation with antipyretic effect of two drugs.
Collectively, our results delineate a potential mechanism of two different bile Arisaemas against febrile via regulating metabolic disorders and targeting inhibition of inflammation for the improvement of fever symptom of the body. Notably, our current study suggested that CBA might be a better choice for suppressing fever clinically.
牛胆汁天南星(CBA)和猪胆汁天南星(PBA)均为中国药典收载的发酵炮制品种,由天南星(Wall.)Schott 和动物胆汁加工而成。传统上,天南星常被用于清热化痰、息风定惊。现代药理学研究表明,两种药物均具有解热作用,但缺乏系统的、比较的作用机制证据。
全面阐明两种药物解热作用的差异及其作用机制。
本研究成功建立并应用一种基于超高效液相色谱-串联三重四极杆质谱(UPLC-TQ MS)的准确可靠检测方法,比较两种药物中胆汁酸的含量差异。此外,建立干酵母致热大鼠模型,检测直肠温度和发热细胞因子含量,评价 CBA 和 PBA 的解热作用。基于超高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱(UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS)技术的血清和下丘脑非靶向代谢组学分析,阐明代谢谱的变化。
结果表明,CBA 和 PBA 均具有显著的解热作用,但 CBA 的起效更快,作用持续时间更长。ELISA 和 Western blotting 分析表明,两种药物的解热作用机制与通过调节 TLR4/NF-κB 信号通路抑制炎症密切相关。此外,代谢途径分析表明,脂质代谢和氨基酸代谢受到严重干扰,与两种药物的解热作用具有一定的相关性。
综上所述,本研究结果通过调节代谢紊乱和靶向抑制炎症,描绘了两种不同天南星属植物治疗发热的潜在机制,可改善机体发热症状。值得注意的是,本研究提示 CBA 可能是临床上抑制发热的更好选择。