Suppr超能文献

基于治疗前血浆 EBV DNA 选择 N3 期鼻咽癌诱导化疗周期。

Selection of induction chemotherapy cycles for stage N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on pre-treatment plasma EBV DNA.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Department of Oncology, Second Hospital of Sanming City, Sanming, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 18;14(1):24484. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75396-z.

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the selection of induction chemotherapy (IC) cycles for stage N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We employed propensity score matching (PSM) to categorize patients into 3-cycle and 4-cycle IC groups (IC = 3 and IC = 4). The log-rank and chi-squared tests were used respectively to evaluate the differences in survival and acute toxicities. Survival outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) were evaluated among the two groups. After PSM, each group comprised 99 patients. The IC = 4 group exhibited markedly improved survival outcomes compared with the IC = 3 group. Multivariate analysis revealed that pre-EBV DNA was an independent risk factor affecting PFS and DMFS. For high-risk patients with pre-EBV DNA ≥ 7800 copies/ml, the IC = 4 group demonstrated greater survival compared to the IC = 3 group. Among low-risk patients with pre-EBV DNA < 7800 copies/ml, both groups showed comparable survival outcomes. In terms of acute adverse reactions, the IC = 4 group experienced higher incidences, particularly with grade 2-4 alanine transaminase elevation and thrombocytopenia. For stage N3 NPC, pre-EBV DNA could be a powerful predictor for guiding the selection of IC cycles. The IC = 4 regimen is probably more beneficial to high-risk patients due to superior survival, while for low-risk patients, the IC = 3 regimen may be sufficient.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨 N3 期鼻咽癌(NPC)诱导化疗(IC)周期的选择。我们采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)将患者分为 3 周期和 4 周期 IC 组(IC=3 和 IC=4)。分别采用对数秩检验和卡方检验评估生存和急性毒性的差异。评估两组间的生存结局包括总生存(OS)、无进展生存(PFS)、无远处转移生存(DMFS)和无局部区域复发生存(LRRFS)。PSM 后,每组各有 99 例患者。IC=4 组的生存结局明显优于 IC=3 组。多变量分析显示 EBV DNA 是影响 PFS 和 DMFS 的独立危险因素。对于 EBV DNA≥7800 拷贝/ml 的高危患者,IC=4 组的生存优于 IC=3 组。对于 EBV DNA<7800 拷贝/ml 的低危患者,两组的生存结局相似。在急性不良反应方面,IC=4 组的发生率更高,特别是丙氨酸转氨酶升高和血小板减少的 2-4 级。对于 N3 期 NPC,EBV DNA 可能是指导 IC 周期选择的有力预测指标。对于高危患者,IC=4 方案可能更有益,因为生存获益更高,而对于低危患者,IC=3 方案可能已经足够。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f9f/11489564/eacb2ea4b0c6/41598_2024_75396_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验