Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Department of Oncology, Second Hospital of Sanming City, Sanming, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 18;14(1):24484. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75396-z.
This study aimed to explore the selection of induction chemotherapy (IC) cycles for stage N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We employed propensity score matching (PSM) to categorize patients into 3-cycle and 4-cycle IC groups (IC = 3 and IC = 4). The log-rank and chi-squared tests were used respectively to evaluate the differences in survival and acute toxicities. Survival outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) were evaluated among the two groups. After PSM, each group comprised 99 patients. The IC = 4 group exhibited markedly improved survival outcomes compared with the IC = 3 group. Multivariate analysis revealed that pre-EBV DNA was an independent risk factor affecting PFS and DMFS. For high-risk patients with pre-EBV DNA ≥ 7800 copies/ml, the IC = 4 group demonstrated greater survival compared to the IC = 3 group. Among low-risk patients with pre-EBV DNA < 7800 copies/ml, both groups showed comparable survival outcomes. In terms of acute adverse reactions, the IC = 4 group experienced higher incidences, particularly with grade 2-4 alanine transaminase elevation and thrombocytopenia. For stage N3 NPC, pre-EBV DNA could be a powerful predictor for guiding the selection of IC cycles. The IC = 4 regimen is probably more beneficial to high-risk patients due to superior survival, while for low-risk patients, the IC = 3 regimen may be sufficient.
本研究旨在探讨 N3 期鼻咽癌(NPC)诱导化疗(IC)周期的选择。我们采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)将患者分为 3 周期和 4 周期 IC 组(IC=3 和 IC=4)。分别采用对数秩检验和卡方检验评估生存和急性毒性的差异。评估两组间的生存结局包括总生存(OS)、无进展生存(PFS)、无远处转移生存(DMFS)和无局部区域复发生存(LRRFS)。PSM 后,每组各有 99 例患者。IC=4 组的生存结局明显优于 IC=3 组。多变量分析显示 EBV DNA 是影响 PFS 和 DMFS 的独立危险因素。对于 EBV DNA≥7800 拷贝/ml 的高危患者,IC=4 组的生存优于 IC=3 组。对于 EBV DNA<7800 拷贝/ml 的低危患者,两组的生存结局相似。在急性不良反应方面,IC=4 组的发生率更高,特别是丙氨酸转氨酶升高和血小板减少的 2-4 级。对于 N3 期 NPC,EBV DNA 可能是指导 IC 周期选择的有力预测指标。对于高危患者,IC=4 方案可能更有益,因为生存获益更高,而对于低危患者,IC=3 方案可能已经足够。