• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较新辅助单药治疗与双 HER2 阻断治疗用于 HER2 阳性乳腺癌保乳手术转化:一项荟萃分析。

Comparison of neoadjuvant single-agent treatment and dual-HER2 blockade for breast-conserving surgery conversion in HER2-positive breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 530021, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):1293. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13052-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-024-13052-5
PMID:39425072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11490152/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant targeted therapy has shown that improve pathologic complete response and facilitate breast-conserving surgery, but the difference between single-agent treatment or dual-HER2 blockade to the conversion of breast-conserving surgery has not been well described.

METHODS

Via the systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases, 5 eligible studies used to perform this meta-analysis, which was carried out using RevMan version 5.4.

RESULTS

A total of 1306 patients from five randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis, revealing a significant increase in the conversion rate to breast-conserving surgery with neoadjuvant targeted therapy (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.57; p = 0.0003). The odds ratio (OR) for single-agent treatment compared to dual-HER2 blockade was 1.04 (95% CI 0.73-1.48; p = 0.82). For pathological complete response (pCR), the OR for single-HER2 blockade versus dual-HER2 blockade was 0.43 (95% CI 0.34-0.55; p = 0.01), and for clinical response, it was 0.81 (95% CI 0.59-1.10; p = 0.17). The OR for serious adverse events between single-HER2 and dual-HER2 blockade was 0.72 (95% CI 0.55-0.95; p = 0.02). The risk ratio (RR) for pCR and the shift from mastectomy to BCS was 1.16 (95% CI 0.78-1.72; p = 0.47), while for clinical response and the shift from mastectomy to BCS, it was 2.40 (95% CI 1.44-4.01; p = 0.0008).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant targeted treatment obviously promote the actual implementation rate of breast-conserving surgery, nevertheless, there was no statistically significant increase in single-agent treatment versus dual-HER2 blockade.

摘要

背景

新辅助靶向治疗已显示可提高病理完全缓解率并促进保乳手术,但单药治疗与双 HER2 阻断对保乳手术转化率的差异尚未得到很好的描述。

方法

通过对 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库的系统文献检索,对 5 项符合条件的研究进行了荟萃分析,该分析使用 RevMan 版本 5.4 进行。

结果

共有 5 项随机对照试验的 1306 名患者纳入了分析,结果显示新辅助靶向治疗显著提高了保乳手术的转化率(OR 0.30,95%CI 0.15-0.57;p=0.0003)。与双 HER2 阻断相比,单药治疗的优势比(OR)为 1.04(95%CI 0.73-1.48;p=0.82)。对于病理完全缓解(pCR),单 HER2 阻断与双 HER2 阻断的 OR 为 0.43(95%CI 0.34-0.55;p=0.01),而对于临床反应,OR 为 0.81(95%CI 0.59-1.10;p=0.17)。单 HER2 与双 HER2 阻断之间严重不良事件的 OR 为 0.72(95%CI 0.55-0.95;p=0.02)。pCR 和从乳房切除术转为保乳术的风险比(RR)为 1.16(95%CI 0.78-1.72;p=0.47),而临床反应和从乳房切除术转为保乳术的 RR 为 2.40(95%CI 1.44-4.01;p=0.0008)。

结论

新辅助靶向治疗明显提高了保乳手术的实际实施率,但单药治疗与双 HER2 阻断相比,并没有统计学上的显著增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe86/11490152/9b6cdd2a2cbd/12885_2024_13052_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe86/11490152/898e68272c57/12885_2024_13052_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe86/11490152/29643800a054/12885_2024_13052_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe86/11490152/8a294fd57a91/12885_2024_13052_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe86/11490152/350470f5934f/12885_2024_13052_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe86/11490152/958fa287876e/12885_2024_13052_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe86/11490152/30faf9f08225/12885_2024_13052_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe86/11490152/9b6cdd2a2cbd/12885_2024_13052_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe86/11490152/898e68272c57/12885_2024_13052_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe86/11490152/29643800a054/12885_2024_13052_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe86/11490152/8a294fd57a91/12885_2024_13052_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe86/11490152/350470f5934f/12885_2024_13052_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe86/11490152/958fa287876e/12885_2024_13052_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe86/11490152/30faf9f08225/12885_2024_13052_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe86/11490152/9b6cdd2a2cbd/12885_2024_13052_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of neoadjuvant single-agent treatment and dual-HER2 blockade for breast-conserving surgery conversion in HER2-positive breast cancer: a meta-analysis.比较新辅助单药治疗与双 HER2 阻断治疗用于 HER2 阳性乳腺癌保乳手术转化:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):1293. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13052-5.
2
Dual HER2 Blockade in Neoadjuvant Treatment of HER2+ Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Review.新辅助治疗 HER2+乳腺癌的双 HER2 阻断:荟萃分析和综述。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1533033820960721. doi: 10.1177/1533033820960721.
3
Axillary response according to neoadjuvant single or dual human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade in clinically node-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer.临床淋巴结阳性、HER2 阳性乳腺癌中,新辅助单药或双药人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)阻断的腋窝反应。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Oct 15;149(8):1585-1592. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33726. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
4
Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab plus Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone to Treat Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.新辅助贝伐单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗治疗非转移性乳腺癌:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145442. eCollection 2015.
5
Dual Block with Lapatinib and Trastuzumab Versus Single-Agent Trastuzumab Combined with Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.曲妥珠单抗联合拉帕替尼与曲妥珠单抗单药联合化疗作为人表皮生长因子受体 2 阳性乳腺癌新辅助治疗的对比:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Sep 15;22(18):4594-603. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1881. Epub 2016 May 2.
6
Surgery following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer participating in the NeOAdjuvant Herceptin (NOAH) study.曲妥珠单抗辅助治疗局部晚期或炎性乳腺癌的 NeOAdjuvant Herceptin(NOAH)研究中,接受新辅助治疗后行手术治疗的 HER2 阳性患者。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;37(10):856-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
7
Imaging and Clinicopathologic Features Associated With Pathologic Complete Response in HER2-positive Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Dual HER2 Blockade.接受双重 HER2 阻断的新辅助化疗的 HER2 阳性乳腺癌的影像学和临床病理特征与病理完全缓解相关。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2020 Feb;20(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
8
Factors associated with surgical management following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with primary HER2-positive breast cancer: results from the NeoALTTO phase III trial.新辅助治疗后原发性 HER2 阳性乳腺癌患者行手术治疗的相关因素:NeoALTTO Ⅲ期临床试验结果。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Aug;24(8):1980-5. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt129. Epub 2013 Apr 7.
9
Trastuzumab combined to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.曲妥珠单抗联合新辅助化疗治疗人表皮生长因子受体 2 阳性乳腺癌的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Breast. 2011 Dec;20(6):485-90. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
10
Lapatinib as a component of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive operable breast cancer (NSABP protocol B-41): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.拉帕替尼作为曲妥珠单抗辅助治疗 HER2 阳性可手术乳腺癌的新辅助治疗(NSABP 协议 B-41):一项开放标签、随机、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Nov;14(12):1183-92. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70411-X. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Neoadjuvant pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with anthracycline- free chemotherapy regimen in patients with HER2 positive breast cancer-Real-world data from a single center in India.曲妥珠单抗联合帕妥珠单抗新辅助治疗联合无蒽环类化疗方案治疗人表皮生长因子受体 2 阳性乳腺癌的真实世界数据:来自印度单中心的研究结果。
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2021;29:100483. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100483. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
3
Dual HER2 blockade therapy increases the risk of developing cardiac toxicities in HER2-positive breast cancer: An up-to-date comprehensive meta-analysis.
Breast J. 2021 Jan;27(1):69-71. doi: 10.1111/tbj.14098. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
4
Real-world effectiveness of dual HER2 blockade with pertuzumab and trastuzumab for neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer (The NEOPETRA Study).曲妥珠单抗和帕妥珠单抗双 HER2 阻断用于人表皮生长因子受体 2 阳性早期乳腺癌新辅助治疗的真实世界疗效(NEOPETRA 研究)。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Nov;184(2):469-479. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05866-1. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
5
Conversion rate from mastectomy to breast conservation after neoadjuvant dual target therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer in the Asian population.在亚洲人群中,接受曲妥珠单抗和帕妥珠单抗新辅助双靶治疗的 HER2 阳性乳腺癌患者,改行保乳手术的转化率。
Breast Cancer. 2020 May;27(3):456-463. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-01037-3. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
Breast-conservation Therapy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Does Not Compromise 10-Year Breast Cancer-specific Mortality.新辅助化疗后保乳治疗不会影响10年乳腺癌特异性死亡率。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Dec;41(12):1246-1251. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000456.
7
Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant therapy and its impact in facilitating breast conservation in operable breast cancer.新辅助治疗及其在促进可手术乳腺癌保乳治疗中的作用的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2018 Apr;105(5):469-481. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10807.
8
De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017.降阶梯和升阶梯治疗早期乳腺癌:2017 年圣加仑国际早期乳腺癌专家共识会议关于早期乳腺癌的主要治疗。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1700-1712. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx308.
9
Does dual HER-2 blockade treatment increase the risk of severe toxicities of special interests in breast cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.双重HER-2阻断治疗是否会增加乳腺癌患者特殊关注的严重毒性风险:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 21;8(12):19923-19933. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15252.
10
Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-years for 32 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、区域和国家癌症发病率、死亡率、生命损失年数、失能生存年数以及 32 种癌症组别的伤残调整生命年数,1990 年至 2015 年:全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;3(4):524-548. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688.