• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学竖井、社会认同与照护职责:呼吁卫生领导者改善照护转接

Medical silos, social identity, and duty of care: A call for health leaders to improve transitions of care.

作者信息

Bakewell Francis

机构信息

Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Healthc Manage Forum. 2025 Mar;38(2):148-151. doi: 10.1177/08404704241290689. Epub 2024 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1177/08404704241290689
PMID:39425269
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11849241/
Abstract

This article explores the concept of medical silos, particularly within hospital systems, and examines their deeper roots in social identity and the fiduciary duty of care of healthcare providers. While traditional perspectives focus on informational and communication barriers, this analysis highlights how professional identity and moral obligations contribute to the persistence of silos. Social identity theory reveals that strong in-group affiliations, formed during medical training and specialization, fosters collaboration within groups but also create divisions between them. Similarly, the fiduciary duty of care, central to ethical medical practice, may inadvertently reinforce silo boundaries in resource-limited environments. By emphasizing the role of centralized leadership, the article proposes that health system managers and leaders, with the broadest possible duty of care, must take action to dismantle these barriers. Recommendations include re-evaluating policies for patient transitions and fostering integrated care pathways to improve overall system flow, rather than simply balancing the agendas of stakeholders within their silos.

摘要

本文探讨了医疗孤岛的概念,尤其是在医院系统中的情况,并审视了其在社会认同以及医疗服务提供者的信托责任方面的更深层次根源。虽然传统观点聚焦于信息和沟通障碍,但本分析强调了专业认同和道德义务如何导致孤岛现象的持续存在。社会认同理论表明,在医学培训和专业化过程中形成的强烈的群体内归属感促进了群体内部的协作,但也造成了群体之间的分化。同样,作为道德医疗实践核心的信托责任,在资源有限的环境中可能会无意中强化孤岛界限。通过强调集中领导的作用,本文提出,负有尽可能广泛的照护责任的卫生系统管理者和领导者必须采取行动消除这些障碍。建议包括重新评估患者转诊政策,促进整合的照护路径以改善整个系统的流程,而不是仅仅平衡孤岛内利益相关者的议程。

相似文献

1
Medical silos, social identity, and duty of care: A call for health leaders to improve transitions of care.医学竖井、社会认同与照护职责:呼吁卫生领导者改善照护转接
Healthc Manage Forum. 2025 Mar;38(2):148-151. doi: 10.1177/08404704241290689. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
2
A Call to Bridge Across Silos during Care Transitions.呼吁在照护过渡期间跨越壁垒。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 May;44(5):270-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.10.006.
3
Managing intergroup silos to improve patient flow.管理群体间的隔阂,以改善患者流量。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2022;47(2):125-132. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000310.
4
Call of Duty - What are Physicians' Obligations During Crises?《使命召唤——危机期间医生的职责是什么?》
J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;63(4):592-596. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.07.017. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
5
The moral foundation of medical leadership: the professional virtues of the physician as fiduciary of the patient.医学领导力的道德基础:医生作为患者受托人的职业美德。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Apr;184(5):875-9; discussion 879-80. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.113854.
6
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.注册护士在养老院的管理和领导经验:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x.
7
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
8
Ethical dimensions of leadership in community health nursing.社区健康护理中领导力的伦理维度
J Community Health Nurs. 1989;6(2):103-12. doi: 10.1207/s15327655jchn0602_6.
9
Navigating Transitions in Oncology Care: From Emergency Department to Outpatient Clinic.肿瘤患者诊疗过渡期管理:从急诊科到门诊。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2024 Apr;40(2):151585. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151585. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Influences of specialty identity when implementing a new emergency department in Denmark: a qualitative study.丹麦实施新急诊部时的专业身份影响:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 1;24(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10604-0.
2
How to Use Lean Thinking for the Optimization of Clinical Pathways: A Systematic Review and a Proposed Framework to Analyze Pathways on a System Level.如何运用精益思维优化临床路径:一项系统综述及在系统层面分析路径的框架建议
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 7;11(18):2488. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182488.
3
Ethics of the fiduciary relationship between patient and physician: the case of informed consent.患者与医生之间信托关系的伦理:知情同意的案例
J Med Ethics. 2024 Dec 23;51(1):59-66. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108539.
4
Leadership & Professional Development: Specialty Silos in Medicine.领导力与专业发展:医学领域的专业孤岛
J Hosp Med. 2021 Jun;16(6):357. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3647.
5
Physicians' professional autonomy and their organizational identification with their hospital.医生的专业自主权及其对医院的组织认同。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 12;18(1):775. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3582-z.
6
Medical Ethics; or a Code of Institutes and Precepts Adapted to the Professional Conduct of Physicians and Surgeons.《医学伦理学;或适用于内科医生和外科医生职业行为的准则与戒律》
Br Foreign Med Chir Rev. 1850 Apr;5(10):285-310.
7
Group processes in medical education: learning from social identity theory.医学教育中的群体过程:从社会认同理论中学习。
Med Educ. 2012 Feb;46(2):143-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04099.x.
8
Intergroup relationships and quality improvement in healthcare.医患群体关系与医疗质量提升。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Apr;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i62-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.046169.
9
From clinical ethics to organizational ethics: the second stage of the evolution of bioethics.从临床伦理到组织伦理:生物伦理学发展的第二阶段
Bioethics Forum. 1996 Summer;12(2):3-12.
10
Business ethics, stakeholder theory, and the ethics of healthcare organizations.商业伦理、利益相关者理论与医疗保健组织的伦理
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2000 Spring;9(2):169-81. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100902044.