Vijverberg Joanna R G, Rouppe van der Voort Marc B V, van der Nat Paul B, Mosselman Machteld J, Rigter Sander, Biesma Douwe H, van Merode Frits
Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 7;11(18):2488. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182488.
Lean Thinking and clinical pathways are commonly used concepts to improve healthcare. However, little is known on how to use Lean Thinking for the optimization of pathways or the quantification of both concepts. This study aims to create a framework to analyze pathways with Lean Thinking on a system level, by quantifying the seven wastes, flow and pull. A systematic literature review was performed. Inclusion criteria were the focus of the article on a well-defined group of patients and studied a pathway optimization with Lean Thinking. Data were extracted on measured outcomes, type of intervention and type of researched pathway. Thirty-six articles were included. No articles described the implementation of the Lean Thinking philosophy or studied the development of their people and partners ("4 P" model). Most articles used process optimization tools or problem-solving tools. The majority of the studies focused on process measures. The measures found in the review were used as input for our suggested framework to identify and quantify wastes, flow, and pull in a clinical pathway. The proposed framework can be used to create an overview of the improvement potential of a pathway or to analyze the level of improvement after an enhancement is introduced to a pathway. Further research is needed to study the use of the suggested quantifications.
精益思维和临床路径是改善医疗保健常用的概念。然而,对于如何运用精益思维来优化路径或对这两个概念进行量化,人们了解甚少。本研究旨在创建一个框架,通过对七种浪费、流程和拉动进行量化,在系统层面运用精益思维分析路径。进行了一项系统的文献综述。纳入标准为文章聚焦于明确界定的患者群体,并研究了运用精益思维进行的路径优化。提取了有关测量结果、干预类型和所研究路径类型的数据。纳入了36篇文章。没有文章描述精益思维理念的实施情况,也没有研究其人员和合作伙伴的发展情况(“4P”模型)。大多数文章使用了流程优化工具或问题解决工具。大多数研究聚焦于流程指标。综述中发现的指标被用作我们所建议框架的输入,以识别和量化临床路径中的浪费、流程和拉动。所提出的框架可用于创建路径改进潜力的概述,或在对路径引入改进措施后分析改进水平。需要进一步研究以探讨所建议量化方法的应用。