Suppr超能文献

胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)-文献的系统评价。

Cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) - A systematic review of the literature.

机构信息

NAO KazNMU named after S.D. Asfendiyarov, Almaty, Kazakhstan.

ICCR PERSONA, Almaty, Kazakhstan.

出版信息

Gynecol Endocrinol. 2024 Dec;40(1):2414783. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2024.2414783. Epub 2024 Oct 19.

Abstract

: Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) stimulates ovaries to block the premature surge of luteinizing hormone (LH) by using micronized progesterone or a progestin during the follicular phase instead of the conventional gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues or GnRH antagonists downregulating LH to obtain multi-follicle engagement. Current work aims to assess the influence of progestogen treatment on ovarian stimulation and the ability to control LH surge, its efficacy and suitability in retrieving oocytes, without affecting the embryo quality and its benefit among infertile women long-term outcomes on children compared to standard stimulation protocols. The literature review used the randomized control trials published in the Pubmed database from January 2015 to April 2021. To generate the citation list, the following keywords were used: 'progestin-primed ovarian stimulation', 'PPOS', 'micronized progesterone', 'medroxyprogesterone', and/or 'dydrogesterone'. The selected articles analyzed the cohort, intervention, and scheme of the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for in-vitro fertilization (IVF)/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) used in Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART). Overall we concluded that PPOS for IVF/ICSI in ART results in a higher number of obtained embryos, lower incidence of OHSS, equal duration of stimulation, number of retrieved oocytes, and number of MII oocytes. It is also suggested that long-term safety in children shows no significant difference between the study and control groups. Despite the outcomes of progestin stimulation cycles among all cohorts, we concluded that poor ovarian responders, patients with PCOS, women of advanced age and oocyte donors benefit the most from using PPOS.

摘要

孕激素预处理的卵巢刺激(PPOS)通过在卵泡期使用微粒化孕激素或孕激素代替传统的促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)类似物或 GnRH 拮抗剂来抑制黄体生成素(LH)的过早激增,从而刺激卵巢以获得多卵泡募集。目前的工作旨在评估孕激素治疗对卵巢刺激和控制 LH 激增的影响、其在获取卵子方面的疗效和适用性,而不影响胚胎质量,并与标准刺激方案相比,评估其对不孕妇女长期结局的益处。文献综述使用了 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 4 月期间在 Pubmed 数据库中发表的随机对照试验。为了生成引文列表,使用了以下关键词:“孕激素预处理的卵巢刺激”、“PPOS”、“微粒化孕激素”、“甲羟孕酮”和/或“地屈孕酮”。所选文章分析了孕激素预处理的卵巢刺激方案在体外受精(IVF)/胞浆内精子注射(ICSI)控制性卵巢刺激(COS)中的队列、干预和方案,用于辅助生殖技术(ART)。总的来说,我们得出结论,PPOS 用于 ART 中的 IVF/ICSI 可获得更多数量的胚胎,OHSS 的发生率较低,刺激持续时间、获卵数和 MII 卵数相等。还表明,在儿童中,研究组和对照组之间的长期安全性没有显著差异。尽管所有队列的孕激素刺激周期结果不同,但我们得出结论,卵巢反应不良者、多囊卵巢综合征患者、高龄妇女和卵母细胞供体最受益于使用 PPOS。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验