• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Nursing process performance measurement tool based on bloom's revised taxonomy: A validity and reliability analysis.

作者信息

Lee Ji Sun

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Daejeon University, Daejeon 300-716, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Nov;81:104165. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104165. Epub 2024 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104165
PMID:39426322
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to develop a measurement tool that could evaluate educational approaches by integrating the cognitive dimensions required at each stage of the nursing process and strengthening the connection between education and clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

The nursing process is a core component of nursing practice and supports nurses and nursing students in systematically performing the problem-solving process necessary for patient health management.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, methodological study.

METHODS

A nursing process performance measurement tool that could measure the cognitive dimensions required at each stage of the nursing process was developed based on Anderson's and Bloom's revised taxonomy. The data for this study were collected from July to August 2023 at four universities in South Korea. The reliability and validity of the measurement tool were evaluated through a survey conducted on 406 nursing students. Participants were third- and fourth-year nursing students with clinical practice experience, recruited through purposive sampling.

RESULTS

The developed tool was designed to systematically measure and evaluate each step of the nursing process. This tool consisted of 28 questions, each of which was divided into five assessment questions, six diagnosis questions, six planning questions, five implementation questions and six evaluation questions. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("not at all") to 5 ("very much"). The measurement score ranged from 28 to 140 points, with higher scores indicating better nursing process performance. The cumulative variance contribution rate of the tool was 68.1 % and the Cronbach's α value was 0.85 for all items.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a basis for evaluating educational approaches in nursing curricula by integrating the cognitive dimensions required at each stage of the nursing process. This approach can strengthen the connection between education and clinical practice and can be used not only as a tool to systematically evaluate the learning outcomes of nursing students but also as a standardized nursing process guide.

摘要

相似文献

1
Nursing process performance measurement tool based on bloom's revised taxonomy: A validity and reliability analysis.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Nov;81:104165. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104165. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
2
Development and psychometric evaluation of the hidden curriculum assessment scale in nursing education: A validity and reliability study.护理教育隐性课程评估量表的编制及心理测量学评价:一项效度和信度研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Jul;78:104012. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104012. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
3
Chinese version of the clinical learning environment comparison survey: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床学习环境比较调查中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Dec;71:121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.026. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
4
Developing an instrument to measure nurses' attitudes towards nursing students during clinical practice: A quantitative study.开发一种用于测量护士在临床实践中对护生态度的工具:一项定量研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Feb;145:106488. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106488. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
5
Development and validation of a new satisfaction scale for objective structured clinical assessments (S-OSCA): A multicenter cross-sectional study.开发和验证一种新的客观结构化临床评估(S-OSCA)满意度量表:一项多中心横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Oct;141:106308. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106308. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
6
The Enhancing of Nurses' and Midwives' Competence in Providing Spiritual Care through Innovative Education and Compassionate Care using the Spiritual Care Competency Self-Assessment Tool: Turkish Version.使用精神护理能力自我评估工具,通过创新教育和关怀护理提高护士和助产士提供精神护理的能力:土耳其语版本
J Relig Health. 2025 Apr;64(2):965-979. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02132-2. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
7
Assessment of the validity and reliability of the nurses' professional values scale-revised in Persian version among nursing students.评估波斯语版修订后的护士职业价值观量表在护理专业学生中的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 25;25(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06677-y.
8
Measuring cultural awareness of nursing students: a first step toward cultural competency.衡量护生的文化意识:迈向文化能力的第一步。
J Transcult Nurs. 2008 Jul;19(3):250-8. doi: 10.1177/1043659608317451. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
9
Factor Analytic Adaptation Study of the Groningen Reflection Ability Scale (GRAS) in Senior Nursing Students.格罗宁根反思能力量表(GRAS)在高级护理专业学生中的因素分析适应性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Jul;150:106690. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106690. Epub 2025 Mar 16.
10
An exploratory factor analysis for developing and validating a scale of Nursing Students Competence Instrument.一项用于开发和验证护理学生能力量表的探索性因素分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Mar;50:87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.007. Epub 2016 Dec 18.