• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位对急性缺血性脑卒中患者溶栓药物选择及其结局的影响。

Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Patients' Choice of Thrombolytic Agent and its Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Neurol India. 2024 Sep 1;72(5):1003-1008. doi: 10.4103/neurol-india.ni_1187_21. Epub 2024 Oct 19.

DOI:10.4103/neurol-india.ni_1187_21
PMID:39428772
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Alteplase, a recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rtPA) is the only FDA-approved thrombolytic drug in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Tenecteplase is a modified rtPA, which is cheaper. We aimed to study influence of socioeconomic status (SES) in patients' preference of thrombolytic agent and its outcome.

METHODS

This prospective observational study conducted in PGIMER, a tertiary care center in India, recruited AIS patients thrombolyzed between July 2017 and September 2018. We studied variables including SES, thrombolytic agent chosen, and outcomes like National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at 24-h and at discharge; and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) after 3 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients received tenecteplase and 39 patients received alteplase. Seven patients belonged to upper class, all of whom (100%) chose alteplase. Thirty patients belonged to upper middle class, of whom 25 (83.3%) and five (16.7%) patients chose alteplase and tenecteplase, respectively. Twenty-five patients belonged to lower middle class in which seven (28%) and 15 (72%) chose alteplase and Tenecteplase, respectively. Twenty patients were in upper lower class, of whom 4 (20%) and 16 (80%) chose alteplase and Tenecteplase, respectively. The difference in distribution of SES in tenecteplase and alteplase groups was significant (P = 0.000). Median 3 month-mRS scores were 3 and 3.5 in alteplase and tenecteplase groups, respectively (P = 0.608). There were no significant differences in NIHSS score improvement at 24 h postthrombolysis (P = 0.537) or at discharge (P = 0.429) among different SES categories. No correlation between SES and 3 month-mRS score was found (Spearman's ρ = 0.101, P = 0.398).

CONCLUSIONS

Majority of patients in upper and lower SES chose alteplase and Tenecteplase, respectively. However, there were no significant differences in outcomes among various SES categories.

摘要

背景与目的

阿替普酶,一种重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rtPA),是美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准用于急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)的唯一溶栓药物。替奈普酶是一种改良的 rtPA,价格更便宜。我们旨在研究社会经济地位(SES)对患者对溶栓药物的选择及其结果的影响。

方法

这项前瞻性观察研究在印度 PGIMER 进行,该中心为三级医疗中心,纳入了 2017 年 7 月至 2018 年 9 月期间接受溶栓治疗的 AIS 患者。我们研究了包括 SES、选择的溶栓药物以及 NIHSS 评分(24 小时和出院时)和 3 个月后的改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)等结果在内的变量。

结果

39 例患者接受替奈普酶治疗,39 例患者接受阿替普酶治疗。7 例患者属于上层阶级,他们都(100%)选择了阿替普酶。30 例患者属于上层中产阶级,其中 25 例(83.3%)和 5 例(16.7%)患者分别选择了阿替普酶和替奈普酶。25 例患者属于中下层阶级,其中 7 例(28%)和 15 例(72%)分别选择了阿替普酶和替奈普酶。20 例患者属于上层下层阶级,其中 4 例(20%)和 16 例(80%)分别选择了阿替普酶和替奈普酶。替奈普酶和阿替普酶组的 SES 分布差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。阿替普酶和替奈普酶组的中位 3 个月 mRS 评分分别为 3 和 3.5(P=0.608)。不同 SES 类别之间溶栓后 24 小时 NIHSS 评分改善(P=0.537)或出院时(P=0.429)无显著差异。SES 与 3 个月 mRS 评分之间无相关性(Spearman ρ=0.101,P=0.398)。

结论

SES 较高和较低的患者分别更倾向于选择阿替普酶和替奈普酶。然而,不同 SES 类别之间的结局没有显著差异。

相似文献

1
Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Patients' Choice of Thrombolytic Agent and its Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke.社会经济地位对急性缺血性脑卒中患者溶栓药物选择及其结局的影响。
Neurol India. 2024 Sep 1;72(5):1003-1008. doi: 10.4103/neurol-india.ni_1187_21. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
2
Transition from alteplase to tenecteplase for treatment of acute ischemic stroke in a rural stroke network of the Midwest: Planning, execution, safety, and outcomes.从中西部农村卒中网络中的阿替普酶转换为替奈普酶治疗急性缺血性卒中:规划、实施、安全性和结局。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Dec;247:108633. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108633. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
3
Short-Term Safety and Effectiveness for Tenecteplase and Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke.替奈普酶和阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性卒中的短期安全性和有效性
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250548. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0548.
4
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for stroke thrombolysis evaluation (TASTE): A multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled phase III non-inferiority trial protocol.替奈普酶与阿替普酶用于卒中溶栓评估(TASTE):一项多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点、对照 III 期非劣效性试验方案。
Int J Stroke. 2023 Jul;18(6):751-756. doi: 10.1177/17474930231154390. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
5
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute stroke within 4·5 h of onset (ATTEST-2): a randomised, parallel group, open-label trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗发病 4·5 h 内急性脑卒中的比较(ATTEST-2):一项随机、平行分组、开放标签试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2024 Nov;23(11):1087-1096. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00377-6.
6
Routine Use of Tenecteplase for Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke.常规使用替奈普酶进行急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓治疗。
Stroke. 2021 Mar;52(3):1087-1090. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030859. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
7
Intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute ischemic stroke tandem occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current available literature.替奈普酶与阿替普酶用于急性缺血性卒中串联闭塞静脉溶栓的比较:现有文献的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 Mar;58(3):411-419. doi: 10.1007/s11239-025-03084-4. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
8
Clinical outcomes and safety profile of Tenecteplase in wake-up stroke.替奈普酶治疗唤醒型脑卒中的临床转归和安全性。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2020 Nov;142(5):475-479. doi: 10.1111/ane.13296. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
9
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for thrombolysis in patients selected by use of perfusion imaging within 4·5 h of onset of ischaemic stroke (TASTE): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 non-inferiority trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶用于缺血性脑卒中发病 4.5 h 内采用灌注成像选择的患者溶栓治疗(TASTE):一项多中心、随机、对照、3 期非劣效性试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2024 Aug;23(8):775-786. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00206-0. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
10
Tenecteplase vs Alteplase for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ORIGINAL Randomized Clinical Trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性卒中患者:ORIGINAL随机临床试验
JAMA. 2024 Nov 5;332(17):1437-1445. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.14721.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical factors influencing intravenous thrombolysis in patients with cerebral infarction: a retrospective cohort study comparing private car and ambulance transport in Jiaxing, China.影响脑梗死患者静脉溶栓的临床因素:一项在中国嘉兴比较私家车和救护车转运的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 5;15(3):e087326. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087326.