Student Research Committee, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Nov;60(10):6543-6555. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16572. Epub 2024 Oct 20.
Inconsistent results are observed in the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with different montages on motor learning. This study aimed to compare the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) over primary motor cortex (M1) at different intensities on motor learning in healthy young adults. The participants were randomly divided into: (1) 1 mA M1 c-tDCS, (2) 1 mA M1 anodal tDCS (a-tDCS), (3) 2 mA M1 c-tDCS, (4) 2 mA M1 a-tDCS and (5) M1 sham tDCS groups. The groups received 20-min stimulation with serial reaction time task (SRTT) incidentally, while the tDCS was turned off after 30 s in the sham tDCS group. Response time (RT) and error rate (ER) during SRTT were assessed prior, during and 72 h after the intervention. The results of the paired t-test indicated that online learning occurred in all groups (p < 0.05), except in M1 c-tDCS (1 mA) (p > 0.05). One-way ANOVA analysis also indicated that there were differences in offline learning (RT (F(DF) = 5.19(4); p < 0.001; and ER (F(DF) = 9(4), p < 0.0001) among groups, with more offline learning in 1 mA M1 a-tDCS, 2 mA M1 c-tDCS and 2 mA M1 a-tDCS groups (p < 0.05). On the other hand, the 1 mA M1 c-tDCS group did not indicate any consolidation effect or even a trend toward negative offline learning. M1 a-tDCS with different intensities and also 2 mA M1 c-tDCS may be helpful for the enhancement of motor learning in young healthy adults. This study enhances our understanding of tDCS intensity and polarity effects on motor learning, with potential for optimizing therapeutic protocols.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)不同模式对运动学习的影响存在不一致的结果。本研究旨在比较健康年轻成年人初级运动皮层(M1)不同强度的阳极和阴极 tDCS(c-tDCS)对运动学习的影响。参与者随机分为:(1)1 mA M1 c-tDCS,(2)1 mA M1 阳极 tDCS(a-tDCS),(3)2 mA M1 c-tDCS,(4)2 mA M1 a-tDCS 和(5)M1 假刺激 tDCS 组。这些组在进行序列反应时间任务(SRTT)时意外地接受了 20 分钟的刺激,而在假刺激 tDCS 组中,tDCS 在 30 秒后关闭。在干预之前、期间和 72 小时后评估 SRTT 期间的反应时间(RT)和错误率(ER)。配对 t 检验的结果表明,除了 M1 c-tDCS(1 mA)组(p > 0.05)外,所有组均发生在线学习(p < 0.05)。单因素方差分析还表明,离线学习存在差异(RT(F(DF)= 5.19(4);p < 0.001;和 ER(F(DF)= 9(4),p < 0.0001),其中 1 mA M1 a-tDCS、2 mA M1 c-tDCS 和 2 mA M1 a-tDCS 组的离线学习更多(p < 0.05)。另一方面,1 mA M1 c-tDCS 组没有表现出任何巩固效应,甚至表现出负的离线学习趋势。不同强度的 M1 a-tDCS 以及 2 mA M1 c-tDCS 可能有助于增强年轻健康成年人的运动学习。本研究增强了我们对 tDCS 强度和极性对运动学习影响的理解,为优化治疗方案提供了可能。