• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Single Best Answer Questions as a Teaching Tool in Medical Education: An International Mixed-Method Comparative Evaluation.单项最佳答案问题作为医学教育中的一种教学工具:一项国际混合方法比较评估
Cureus. 2024 Sep 19;16(9):e69745. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69745. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Comparing single-best-answer and very-short-answer questions for the assessment of applied medical knowledge in 20 UK medical schools: Cross-sectional study.比较 20 所英国医学院应用医学知识评估中的单项最佳答案题和极简短答案题:横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 26;9(9):e032550. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032550.
3
Assessing the effectiveness of flipped classroom teaching-learning method among undergraduate medical students at gondar university, college of medicine and health sciences: an interventional study.评估翻转课堂教学法在贡德尔大学医学院本科生中的有效性:一项干预研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 7;24(1):1108. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06105-7.
4
Use of prelecture assignment to enhance learning in pharmacology lectures for the 2 year medical students.利用课前作业提高两年制医学生药理学课程的学习效果。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;48(Suppl 1):S65-S68. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.193326.
5
Enhancing medical students` confidence and performance in integrated structured clinical examinations (ISCE) through a novel near-peer, mixed model approach during the COVID-19 pandemic.通过在 COVID-19 大流行期间采用新型近邻、混合模式方法,增强医学生在综合结构化临床考试(ISCE)中的信心和表现。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Feb 23;23(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03970-y.
6
A model for the use of blended learning in large group teaching sessions.混合式学习在大班教学中的应用模式。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 9;17(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1057-2.
7
Do questions help? The impact of audience response systems on medical student learning: a randomised controlled trial.提问有帮助吗?观众反应系统对医学生学习的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Postgrad Med J. 2015 Jul;91(1077):361-7. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132987. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
8
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Effectiveness of buzz session teaching and perception among medical students: an academic interventional study.小班教学有效性及医学生感知的调查:一项学术干预研究。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2024 Sep 1;48(3):609-615. doi: 10.1152/advan.00169.2023. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
10
Comparison of lecture and team-based learning in medical ethics education.讲座法与小组为基础的学习在医学伦理学教育中的比较。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 May;26(3):903-913. doi: 10.1177/0969733017731916. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Online learning resources and social media platforms used by medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic.医学生在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用的在线学习资源和社交媒体平台。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Dec 19;23(1):969. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04906-w.
2
Enhancing medical students` confidence and performance in integrated structured clinical examinations (ISCE) through a novel near-peer, mixed model approach during the COVID-19 pandemic.通过在 COVID-19 大流行期间采用新型近邻、混合模式方法,增强医学生在综合结构化临床考试(ISCE)中的信心和表现。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Feb 23;23(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03970-y.
3
A systematic review of health sciences students' online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间健康科学专业学生在线学习的系统评价
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 3;22(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03579-1.
4
Factors that affect student engagement in online learning in health professions education.影响健康职业教育中学生在线学习参与度的因素。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Mar;110:105261. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105261. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
5
Student engagement in the online classroom: comparing preclinical medical student question-asking behaviors in a videoconference versus in-person learning environment.医学生在网络课堂中的参与度:比较临床前医学生在视频会议和面对面学习环境中的提问行为
FASEB Bioadv. 2020 Dec 11;3(2):110-117. doi: 10.1096/fba.2020-00089. eCollection 2021 Feb.
6
Effective Medical Lecturing: Practice Becomes Theory: A Narrative Review.有效的医学授课:实践转化为理论:一篇叙述性综述
Med Sci Educ. 2021 Jan 12;31(2):935-943. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01172-z. eCollection 2021 Apr.
7
Developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 63.应对 COVID-19 大流行的医学教育发展:快速 BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 63 号。
Med Teach. 2020 Nov;42(11):1202-1215. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1807484. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
8
Medical education during pandemics: a UK perspective.疫情期间的医学教育:英国视角
BMC Med. 2020 Apr 9;18(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01577-y.
9
Comparing single-best-answer and very-short-answer questions for the assessment of applied medical knowledge in 20 UK medical schools: Cross-sectional study.比较 20 所英国医学院应用医学知识评估中的单项最佳答案题和极简短答案题:横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 26;9(9):e032550. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032550.
10
Attention span during lectures: 8 seconds, 10 minutes, or more?讲座期间的注意力持续时间:8秒、10分钟还是更长?
Adv Physiol Educ. 2016 Dec 1;40(4):509-513. doi: 10.1152/advan.00109.2016.

单项最佳答案问题作为医学教育中的一种教学工具:一项国际混合方法比较评估

Single Best Answer Questions as a Teaching Tool in Medical Education: An International Mixed-Method Comparative Evaluation.

作者信息

Zegugu Moemen, Chatoo Saif Abbas, Choudhry Anam, Metezai Huria, Usman Danyal, Kamal Mohammad, El Badawey Abdullah

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Swansea University Health Board, Swansea, GBR.

Internal Medicine, Royal Free London NHS Trust, London, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Sep 19;16(9):e69745. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69745. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.69745
PMID:39429428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11490296/
Abstract

Introduction Single Best Answer questions are an established assessment format in medical education, however, their use as a teaching tool is underexplored in the literature. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and impact of implementing Single Best Answer (SBA) questions into lecture teaching, compared to standard lectures. Methods This evaluation utilised a mixed-method retrospective approach, combining quantitative and qualitative analysis of routine teaching feedback. Over a 2-year period, 10 standard teaching sessions were initially conducted, followed by the development of 43 SBA teaching sessions aimed at improving teaching delivery. Students completed anonymised questionnaires voluntarily after each teaching session (n=3,814 in teaching with SBAs; n=868 in teaching without SBAs). Quantitative data was compared using Welch's t-test. Statistical analysis was completed using the SPSS version 26.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA), with  < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results The mean perceived confidence increase in topics before and after teaching was significantly higher with the SBA lecture compared to the standard lecture teaching group (1.32 ± 0.14, 1.07 ± 0.12 respectively; < 0.001). Engagement levels were significantly higher in the SBA lecture compared to the standard lecture group (4.55 ± 0.12, 4.21 ± 0.15 respectively; < 0.001). Qualitative data supported these results. Conclusion Single Best Answer question use significantly improved student perceived learning outcomes and engagement, indicating its higher efficacy as a teaching tool in our educational programme. This evaluation highlights the potential use of SBA questions to enhance learning in medical education, further studies and testing methods are required to support its wider generalisability.

摘要

引言 最佳单项选择题是医学教育中一种既定的评估形式,然而,其作为一种教学工具在文献中的应用尚未得到充分探索。我们旨在评估与标准讲座相比,在讲座教学中实施最佳单项选择题(SBA)的有效性和影响。方法 本评估采用混合方法回顾性研究,结合对常规教学反馈的定量和定性分析。在两年时间里,最初进行了10次标准教学课程,随后开发了43次旨在改善教学效果的SBA教学课程。每次教学课程后,学生自愿填写匿名问卷(SBA教学中有3814份;无SBA教学中有868份)。使用韦尔奇t检验比较定量数据。使用SPSS 26.0软件(美国纽约州阿蒙克市IBM公司)完成统计分析,P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果 与标准讲座教学组相比,SBA讲座教学前后学生对各主题的感知信心提升均值显著更高(分别为1.32±0.14和1.07±0.12;P<0.001)。与标准讲座组相比,SBA讲座的参与度显著更高(分别为4.55±0.12和4.21±0.15;P<0.001)。定性数据支持了这些结果。结论 使用最佳单项选择题显著提高了学生感知的学习成果和参与度,表明其作为我们教育项目中的一种教学工具具有更高的效能。本评估突出了SBA问题在医学教育中促进学习的潜在用途,需要进一步的研究和测试方法来支持其更广泛的通用性。