Zegugu Moemen, Chatoo Saif Abbas, Choudhry Anam, Metezai Huria, Usman Danyal, Kamal Mohammad, El Badawey Abdullah
Internal Medicine, Swansea University Health Board, Swansea, GBR.
Internal Medicine, Royal Free London NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 19;16(9):e69745. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69745. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Introduction Single Best Answer questions are an established assessment format in medical education, however, their use as a teaching tool is underexplored in the literature. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and impact of implementing Single Best Answer (SBA) questions into lecture teaching, compared to standard lectures. Methods This evaluation utilised a mixed-method retrospective approach, combining quantitative and qualitative analysis of routine teaching feedback. Over a 2-year period, 10 standard teaching sessions were initially conducted, followed by the development of 43 SBA teaching sessions aimed at improving teaching delivery. Students completed anonymised questionnaires voluntarily after each teaching session (n=3,814 in teaching with SBAs; n=868 in teaching without SBAs). Quantitative data was compared using Welch's t-test. Statistical analysis was completed using the SPSS version 26.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA), with < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results The mean perceived confidence increase in topics before and after teaching was significantly higher with the SBA lecture compared to the standard lecture teaching group (1.32 ± 0.14, 1.07 ± 0.12 respectively; < 0.001). Engagement levels were significantly higher in the SBA lecture compared to the standard lecture group (4.55 ± 0.12, 4.21 ± 0.15 respectively; < 0.001). Qualitative data supported these results. Conclusion Single Best Answer question use significantly improved student perceived learning outcomes and engagement, indicating its higher efficacy as a teaching tool in our educational programme. This evaluation highlights the potential use of SBA questions to enhance learning in medical education, further studies and testing methods are required to support its wider generalisability.
引言 最佳单项选择题是医学教育中一种既定的评估形式,然而,其作为一种教学工具在文献中的应用尚未得到充分探索。我们旨在评估与标准讲座相比,在讲座教学中实施最佳单项选择题(SBA)的有效性和影响。方法 本评估采用混合方法回顾性研究,结合对常规教学反馈的定量和定性分析。在两年时间里,最初进行了10次标准教学课程,随后开发了43次旨在改善教学效果的SBA教学课程。每次教学课程后,学生自愿填写匿名问卷(SBA教学中有3814份;无SBA教学中有868份)。使用韦尔奇t检验比较定量数据。使用SPSS 26.0软件(美国纽约州阿蒙克市IBM公司)完成统计分析,P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果 与标准讲座教学组相比,SBA讲座教学前后学生对各主题的感知信心提升均值显著更高(分别为1.32±0.14和1.07±0.12;P<0.001)。与标准讲座组相比,SBA讲座的参与度显著更高(分别为4.55±0.12和4.21±0.15;P<0.001)。定性数据支持了这些结果。结论 使用最佳单项选择题显著提高了学生感知的学习成果和参与度,表明其作为我们教育项目中的一种教学工具具有更高的效能。本评估突出了SBA问题在医学教育中促进学习的潜在用途,需要进一步的研究和测试方法来支持其更广泛的通用性。