Zheng Xiaoqin, Mei Tingting, Xu Hui, Yin Heran, Jin Hua, Gou Chunyan, Wang Xiaojun, Ding Huiguo
Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Center, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Interventional Therapy Center of Liver Disease, Beijing YouAn Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 4;14:1482290. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1482290. eCollection 2024.
Diagnosing high-risk varices (HRV) is crucial for determining the prognosis and treatment strategy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although the Baveno VI consensus guidelines have been validated for assessing HRV in patients with liver cirrhosis, their applicability to those with HCC remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Baveno VI criteria in screening for HRV in patients with HCC.
We searched for English-language articles related to Baveno criteria and HCC across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases, covering publications from their inception until April 19, 2024. Our meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 14.0 and Meta-Disc 1.4 software. We assessed the quality of the included studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. We analyzed pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) using a random-effects model and constructed a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Based on established consensus, the favorable Baveno VI criteria were defined as a liver stiffness measurement (LSM) < 20 kPa and a platelet count (PLT) > 150×10/L to exclude HRV. This study is registered with PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42024533946.
We finally brought four studies, including 1277 patients with HCC, into this meta-analysis. The SEN, SPE, DOR, and AUC of favorable Baveno VI criteria in screening HRV in patients with HCC were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81-0.95), 0.33 (95% CI: 0.25-0.41), 4.44 (95% CI: 2.14-9.22), and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.55-0.64), respectively. The LR+ and LR- of the favorable Baveno VI criteria were 1.34 (95% CI: 1.19-1.50) and 0.30 (95% CI: 0.16-0.58), respectively. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses indicated that BCLC and Child-Pugh stages likely contribute to the heterogeneity in the SPE.
The favorable Baveno VI criteria may not effectively screen HRV in patients with HCC. However, the current evidence is insufficient, and further studies with larger sample sizes and detailed patient subgroups are needed.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024533946.
诊断高危静脉曲张(HRV)对于确定肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的预后和治疗策略至关重要。尽管巴韦诺VI共识指南已被验证可用于评估肝硬化患者的HRV,但其对HCC患者的适用性仍不确定。本研究旨在评估巴韦诺VI标准在筛查HCC患者HRV方面的有效性。
我们在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库中搜索了与巴韦诺标准和HCC相关的英文文章,涵盖从数据库建立至2024年4月19日的出版物。我们使用STATA 14.0和Meta-Disc 1.4软件进行荟萃分析。我们使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2(QUADAS-2)工具评估纳入研究的质量。我们使用随机效应模型分析合并敏感性(SEN)、特异性(SPE)、诊断比值比(DOR)、阳性似然比(LR+)和阴性似然比(LR-),并构建汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线。根据既定共识,将有利的巴韦诺VI标准定义为肝脏硬度测量值(LSM)<20 kPa且血小板计数(PLT)>150×10⁹/L以排除HRV。本研究已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42024533946。
我们最终将四项研究纳入本荟萃分析,包括1277例HCC患者。有利的巴韦诺VI标准在筛查HCC患者HRV时的SEN、SPE、DOR和AUC分别为0.90(95%CI:0.81-0.95)、0.33(95%CI:0.25-0.41)、4.44(95%CI:2.14-9.22)和0.59(95%CI:0.55-0.64)。有利的巴韦诺VI标准的LR+和LR-分别为1.34(95%CI:1.19-1.50)和0.30(95%CI:0.16-0.58)。亚组和荟萃回归分析表明,BCLC和Child-Pugh分期可能是SPE异质性的原因。
有利的巴韦诺VI标准可能无法有效筛查HCC患者的HRV。然而,目前证据不足,需要进一步开展更大样本量和详细患者亚组的研究。