Figarella-Branger Domique, Colin Carole, Mokhtari Karima, Uro-Coste Emmanuelle, Idbaih Ahmed, Appay Romain, Tabouret Emeline, Touat Mehdi, Seyve Antoine, Carpentier Catherine, Dehais Caroline, Ducray François
APHM, CHU Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France.
Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, GlioME Team, Marseille, France.
Neuro Oncol. 2025 Mar 7;27(3):755-766. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae221.
In the POLA cohort, 3 pathological groups of CNS WHO grade 3 oligodendroglioma IDH-mutant and 1p/19q co-deleted have been described: group 1 (high mitotic count only), group 2 (microvascular proliferation MVP and no necrosis), and group 3 (MVP and necrosis).
494 patients from the POLA cohort, with a median follow-up of 96 months were included. To identify the impact of the pathological groups and contrast enhancement (CE) in group 1 on overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS), survival curves were obtained (Kaplan-Meier method) and compared (log-rank test). The prognostic value of clinical factors and CDKN2A homozygous deletion HD were also tested. Multivariate analysis was performed.
Survival analysis demonstrated that the pathological groups were associated with both progression-free survival (PFS P = .01) and overall survival (OS P = .001). In group 1, patients with CE (1CE+) had a poorer prognosis compared to those without (OS P = .028, PFS P = .006). Further stratification into group 1CE-, group 1CE+, group 2, and group 3 provided clearer prognostic distinctions (OS P = .002, PFS P < .0001). Other prognostic factors included age (OS P < .0001, PFS P = .002), extent of surgical resection (OS P = .001, PFS P = .003), KPS (OS P < .0001, PFS P = 0.002), postoperative treatment (OS P = .007, PFS P < .0001), and CDKN2A HD (OS and PFS P < .0001). The pathological groups remained of prognostic significance for PFS in multivariate analysis.
Necrosis and CDKN2A HD are adverse prognostic factors of WHO grade 3 oligodendrogliomas, IDH-mutant, and 1p/19q co-deleted. Besides, in group 1 patients, lack of CE is a factor of better prognosis.
在POLA队列中,已描述了3种WHO 3级少突胶质细胞瘤伴异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)突变和1p/19q共缺失的病理组:第1组(仅有高有丝分裂计数)、第2组(微血管增生且无坏死)和第3组(微血管增生且有坏死)。
纳入POLA队列中的494例患者,中位随访时间为96个月。为确定病理组和第1组中的对比增强(CE)对总生存期(OS)或无进展生存期(PFS)的影响,获取生存曲线(Kaplan-Meier法)并进行比较(对数秩检验)。还对临床因素和细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶2A(CDKN2A)纯合缺失(HD)的预后价值进行了检测。进行多因素分析。
生存分析表明,病理组与无进展生存期(PFS,P = 0.01)和总生存期(OS,P = 0.001)均相关。在第1组中,有CE的患者(1CE+)与无CE的患者相比预后更差(OS,P = 0.028;PFS,P = 0.006)。进一步分层为第1组CE-、第1组CE+、第2组和第3组可提供更清晰的预后区分(OS,P = 0.002;PFS,P < 0.0001)。其他预后因素包括年龄(OS,P < 0.0001;PFS,P = 0.002)、手术切除范围(OS,P = 0.001;PFS,P = 0.003)、Karnofsky功能状态评分(KPS)(OS,P < 0.0001;PFS,P = 0.002)、术后治疗(OS,P = 0.007;PFS,P < 0.0001)以及CDKN2A HD(OS和PFS,P < 0.0001)。在多因素分析中,病理组对PFS仍具有预后意义。
坏死和CDKN2A HD是WHO 3级少突胶质细胞瘤伴IDH突变和1p/19q共缺失的不良预后因素。此外,在第1组患者中,无CE是预后较好的一个因素。