• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同口服抗凝药物预防老年心房颤动患者卒中的疗效和安全性:网状荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of different oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in older patients with atrial fibrillation: A network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan Province, China.

Department of Intensive Care Unit, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan Province, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 18;103(42):e39937. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039937.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000039937
PMID:39432641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11495788/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various oral anticoagulants have been used for stroke prevention in older patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the optimal anticoagulants for stroke prevention has not yet been developed. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to determine the optimal instructions.

METHODS

We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library without restriction for publication date or language at January 2024. Any RCTs that compared the effectiveness of a direct oral anticoagulant and a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for stroke prevention in older patients with AF were included in this network meta-analysis. The Bayesian network meta-analysis used a random effects model and surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis to rank results. All analyses were done using R software with gemtc package, with statistical significance set at P < .05.

RESULTS

We included 7 RCTs (79,003 patients) comparing 8 different instructions including Apixaban 5 mg, Dabigatran 110 mg, Dabigatran 150 mg, Edoxaban 30 mg, Edoxaban 60 mg, Rivaroxaban 15 mg, Rivaroxaban 20 mg, and VKA. Apixaban 5 mg, Dabigatran 110 mg, and Dabigatran 150 mg was more effective than the VKA for reducing stroke or systemic embolism risks, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). Apixaban 5 mg, Dabigatran 110 mg, Dabigatran 150 mg, Edoxaban 30 mg, and Edoxaban 60 mg was associated with a reduction of the intracranial hemorrhage rate than the VKA (P < .05). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve shows that Dabigatran 110 mg ranked first for reducing stroke or systemic embolism risks. Edoxaban 60 mg ranked first for major bleeding. Dabigatran 110 mg ranked first for intracranial hemorrhage. Apixaban 5 mg ranked first for all bleeding events.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct oral anticoagulants were found to have lower rates of thromboembolic events compared to VKAs in older patients with AF. Apixaban 5 mg, Dabigatran 110 mg, Dabigatran 150 mg, Edoxaban 30 mg, and Edoxaban 60 mg were also associated with a reduction of intracranial hemorrhage than VKA.

摘要

背景

各种口服抗凝剂已被用于预防老年房颤(AF)患者的中风。然而,预防中风的最佳抗凝剂尚未开发出来。我们进行了系统评价和网络荟萃分析,以确定最佳的抗凝剂。

方法

我们从 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆中搜索了无发表日期或语言限制的随机对照试验(RCT),直到 2024 年 1 月。本网络荟萃分析纳入了比较直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)预防老年 AF 患者中风效果的任何 RCT。贝叶斯网络荟萃分析采用随机效应模型和累积排序曲线下面积分析来对结果进行排名。所有分析均使用 R 软件和 gemtc 包进行,统计显著性设为 P<0.05。

结果

我们纳入了 7 项 RCT(79003 名患者),比较了 8 种不同的治疗方案,包括阿哌沙班 5mg、达比加群 110mg、达比加群 150mg、依度沙班 30mg、依度沙班 60mg、利伐沙班 15mg、利伐沙班 20mg 和 VKA。阿哌沙班 5mg、达比加群 110mg 和达比加群 150mg 比 VKA 更能有效降低中风或全身性栓塞风险,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。阿哌沙班 5mg、达比加群 110mg、达比加群 150mg、依度沙班 30mg 和依度沙班 60mg 与颅内出血发生率降低相关,与 VKA 相比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。累积排序曲线下面积显示,达比加群 110mg 对降低中风或全身性栓塞风险排名第一。依度沙班 60mg 对大出血的排名第一。达比加群 110mg 对颅内出血的排名第一。阿哌沙班 5mg 对所有出血事件的排名第一。

结论

与 VKA 相比,直接口服抗凝剂在老年 AF 患者中可降低血栓栓塞事件的发生率。阿哌沙班 5mg、达比加群 110mg、达比加群 150mg、依度沙班 30mg 和依度沙班 60mg 与颅内出血发生率降低相关,与 VKA 相比,差异具有统计学意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f8/11495788/a931b098a29d/medi-103-e39937-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f8/11495788/4c91d506eb5c/medi-103-e39937-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f8/11495788/c343d4b0d6c6/medi-103-e39937-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f8/11495788/6ec3cbdf9539/medi-103-e39937-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f8/11495788/26f855f39877/medi-103-e39937-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f8/11495788/8bea5344e5ac/medi-103-e39937-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f8/11495788/305c505ebcfc/medi-103-e39937-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f8/11495788/a931b098a29d/medi-103-e39937-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f8/11495788/4c91d506eb5c/medi-103-e39937-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f8/11495788/c343d4b0d6c6/medi-103-e39937-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f8/11495788/6ec3cbdf9539/medi-103-e39937-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f8/11495788/26f855f39877/medi-103-e39937-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f8/11495788/8bea5344e5ac/medi-103-e39937-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f8/11495788/305c505ebcfc/medi-103-e39937-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f8/11495788/a931b098a29d/medi-103-e39937-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of different oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in older patients with atrial fibrillation: A network meta-analysis.不同口服抗凝药物预防老年心房颤动患者卒中的疗效和安全性:网状荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 18;103(42):e39937. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039937.
2
Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for preventing stroke and systemic embolic events among atrial fibrillation patients with chronic kidney disease.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在预防慢性肾脏病房颤患者中风和全身性栓塞事件方面的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 6;11(11):CD011373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011373.pub2.
3
Severe Bleeding Risk of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Stroke Prevention and Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂在预防和治疗房颤患者中风方面的严重出血风险:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Apr;37(2):363-377. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07232-9. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
4
Effectiveness and Safety of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂用于心房颤动和静脉血栓栓塞的有效性和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Ther. 2017 Jul;39(7):1456-1478.e36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.05.358. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
5
Oral anticoagulants for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and cost effectiveness analysis.口服抗凝药预防心房颤动患者卒中:系统评价、网状Meta分析及成本效益分析
BMJ. 2017 Nov 28;359:j5058. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5058.
6
Real-World Use of Apixaban for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.真实世界中阿哌沙班在房颤卒中预防中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2018 Jan;49(1):98-106. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018395. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
7
The role of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: A PRISMA-compliant article.非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药在亚洲房颤患者中的作用:一篇遵循PRISMA规范的文章。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 2;99(27):e21025. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021025.
8
Non-major bleeding risk of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists for stroke prevention with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂预防房颤卒中的非大出血风险:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Aug;79(8):1013-1022. doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03520-5. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
9
Real-world evidence comparing oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.真实世界证据比较非瓣膜性心房颤动的口服抗凝药物:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Future Cardiol. 2022 May;18(5):393-405. doi: 10.2217/fca-2021-0120. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
10
Comparison of the Non-VKA Oral Anticoagulants Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban in the Extended Treatment and Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班在静脉血栓栓塞症长期治疗和预防中的比较:系统评价与网状Meta分析
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 3;11(8):e0160064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160064. eCollection 2016.